Ad aware Question

H

Honeysweet

I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
would be the one to change to?

Thanks in Advance!


Tarcia
 
A

Alias

Honeysweet wrote:
> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
> would be the one to change to?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
>
> Tarcia
>
>


The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes
 
M

Mart

Not too sure Alias, but wasn't Ad-Aware 6 superseded by Ad-Aware SE Personal
(r1.0x) a year or two ago?

However, I notice that AA SE has also been recently pulled from the Lavasoft
site but is still available from :-
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/AdAware-SE-Personal.shtml

and still currently working here with regular updates (even on my XP box).

Mart


"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Honeysweet wrote:
>> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
>> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
>> would be the one to change to?
>>
>> Thanks in Advance!
>>
>>
>> Tarcia
>>
>>

>
> The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
> 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
 
A

Alias

Mart wrote:
> Not too sure Alias, but wasn't Ad-Aware 6 superseded by Ad-Aware SE Personal
> (r1.0x) a year or two ago?
>
> However, I notice that AA SE has also been recently pulled from the Lavasoft
> site but is still available from :-
> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/AdAware-SE-Personal.shtml
>
> and still currently working here with regular updates (even on my XP box).
>
> Mart


Yes, I believe you're correct.



--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes
 
D

Delboy

Not that it concerns OP, but AA 2007 is still not yet vista-proof according
to Lavasoft website.

--

Delboy

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

Douglas Adams
"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Honeysweet wrote:
>> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
>> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
>> would be the one to change to?
>>
>> Thanks in Advance!
>>
>>
>> Tarcia
>>
>>

>
> The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
> 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
 
H

Heirloom

Hey Del,
Did you ever get the PM I sent to you??
Heirloom, old and may be missing more
mail

"Delboy" <spamfree.delboy.hoy@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:ks2dnSdJB4z0eljbnZ2dnUVZ8sKlnZ2d@bt.com...
> Not that it concerns OP, but AA 2007 is still not yet vista-proof
> according to Lavasoft website.
>
> --
>
> Delboy
>
> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
> completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
>
> Douglas Adams
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
> news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Honeysweet wrote:
>>> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
>>> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
>>> would be the one to change to?
>>>
>>> Thanks in Advance!
>>>
>>>
>>> Tarcia
>>>
>>>

>>
>> The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
>> 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>> To email me, remove shoes

>
 
H

Honeysweet

I was wondering about the 2007 Version..good thing I didnt mess with it!
Thanks for the info..

--




Tarcia
Mom of the Munchkins Ana & Lia
"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Honeysweet wrote:
> > I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
> > Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
> > would be the one to change to?
> >
> > Thanks in Advance!
> >
> >
> > Tarcia
> >
> >

>
> The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
> 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
 
H

Honeysweet

Hmm, wonder why they pulled it?
Does that mean something's wrong with it?
My mom downloaded the AA SE (but she's running XP) and she claims there are
so many things
on it that she cant use because the options are 'grayed" out...
I assumed it was because she has a free copy and not a paid for copy..
So I thought it wasnt good to have....?

Tarcia


"Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:eSLJYPM4HHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not too sure Alias, but wasn't Ad-Aware 6 superseded by Ad-Aware SE

Personal
> (r1.0x) a year or two ago?
>
> However, I notice that AA SE has also been recently pulled from the

Lavasoft
> site but is still available from :-
>

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/AdAware-SE-Personal.shtml
>
> and still currently working here with regular updates (even on my XP box).
>
> Mart
>
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
> news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > Honeysweet wrote:
> >> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
> >> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
> >> would be the one to change to?
> >>
> >> Thanks in Advance!
> >>
> >>
> >> Tarcia
> >>
> >>

> >
> > The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
> > 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
> >
> > --
> > Alias
> > To email me, remove shoes

>
>
 
H

Honeysweet

Im actually glad you mentioned it since I do know some who are using Vista
now
and they wouldnt have known that..
Thanks for the heads up!

Tarcia

--




Tarcia
Mom of the Munchkins Ana & Lia
"Delboy" <spamfree.delboy.hoy@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:ks2dnSdJB4z0eljbnZ2dnUVZ8sKlnZ2d@bt.com...
> Not that it concerns OP, but AA 2007 is still not yet vista-proof

according
> to Lavasoft website.
>
> --
>
> Delboy
>
> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something

completely
> foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
>
> Douglas Adams
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
> news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > Honeysweet wrote:
> >> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
> >> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
> >> would be the one to change to?
> >>
> >> Thanks in Advance!
> >>
> >>
> >> Tarcia
> >>
> >>

> >
> > The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
> > 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
> >
> > --
> > Alias
> > To email me, remove shoes

>
 
D

Delboy

Yes H, replied about 1315 today. Been a bit busy!

--

Delboy

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

Douglas Adams
"Heirloom" <roland58XX@suddenlink.net> wrote in message
news:eQelxtT4HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hey Del,
> Did you ever get the PM I sent to you??
> Heirloom, old and may be missing more
> mail
>
> "Delboy" <spamfree.delboy.hoy@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:ks2dnSdJB4z0eljbnZ2dnUVZ8sKlnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Not that it concerns OP, but AA 2007 is still not yet vista-proof
>> according to Lavasoft website.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Delboy
>>
>> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
>> completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
>>
>> Douglas Adams
>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
>> news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Honeysweet wrote:
>>>> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of date.
>>>> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
>>>> would be the one to change to?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in Advance!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tarcia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
>>> 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>> To email me, remove shoes

>>

>
>
 
D

Delboy

Your welcome Honeysweet (like the tag). I'm using SE on my vista box.

--

Delboy

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

Douglas Adams
"Honeysweet" <HoneySweet1@Gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%230LHzYY4HHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Im actually glad you mentioned it since I do know some who are using Vista
> now
> and they wouldnt have known that..
> Thanks for the heads up!
>
> Tarcia
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Tarcia
> Mom of the Munchkins Ana & Lia
> "Delboy" <spamfree.delboy.hoy@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:ks2dnSdJB4z0eljbnZ2dnUVZ8sKlnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Not that it concerns OP, but AA 2007 is still not yet vista-proof

> according
>> to Lavasoft website.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Delboy
>>
>> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something

> completely
>> foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
>>
>> Douglas Adams
>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com.> wrote in message
>> news:OrCnExL4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> > Honeysweet wrote:
>> >> I am currently running Ad Aware 6, which Im sure is sorely out of
>> >> date.
>> >> Since Im on Windows ME, which of the new versions of Ad Aware
>> >> would be the one to change to?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in Advance!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Tarcia
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > The new version, 2007, only works with XP and Vista, maybe with Windows
>> > 2000. Stick with the old version for Me and update it regularly.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alias
>> > To email me, remove shoes

>>

>
>
 
Back
Top Bottom