Ubuntu Linux has over 12 million users

B

Bill Yanaire

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

> --

> Alias




You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

article:



"Based on the same methodology that we came up with for the 2008 number, our

present belief is that it's somewhere north of 12 million users at the

moment," said Chris Kenyon, vice president for OEM at Canonical



They BELIEVE there numbers are over 12 million but they just don't know.

They are guessing. There is no way to know. You sure are stupid. Maybe 12

million have downloaded that piece of SHIT Ubuntu/Linux/other distros, but

the majority of them delete that shit off their computers. You are just too

stupid to realize that FACT.



Keep digging asshole.
 
A

Alias

Bill Yanaire wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>

>> --

>> Alias


>

> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

> article:




No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.



>

> "Based on the same methodology that we came up with for the 2008 number,

> our present belief is that it's somewhere north of 12 million users at

> the moment," said Chris Kenyon, vice president for OEM at Canonical

>

> They BELIEVE there numbers are over 12 million but they just don't know.

> They are guessing. There is no way to know. You sure are stupid. Maybe

> 12 million have downloaded that piece of SHIT Ubuntu/Linux/other

> distros, but the majority of them delete that shit off their computers.

> You are just too stupid to realize that FACT.

>

> Keep digging asshole.

>

>






--

Alias
 
J

John B. Slocomb

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users




The following was reported some two years ago:



"...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "



Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
J

John B. Slocomb

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>> article:


>

>No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>




Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

Headline.



Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....



You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

you Mr. Nobody?



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
A

Alias

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>>> article:


>>

>> No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>>


>

> Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

> Headline.




False.



>

> Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

> they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....




So what?



>

> You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

> you Mr. Nobody?

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)




This is a NEWS group. I posted some news. Get the fuck over it.



--

Alias
 
A

Alias

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users


>

> The following was reported some two years ago:

>

> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>

> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)




When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?



--

Alias
 
J

John B. Slocomb

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:26:47 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>>>> article:

>>>

>>> No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>>>


>>

>> Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

>> Headline.


>

>False.

>

>>

>> Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

>> they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....


>

>So what?

>

>>

>> You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

>> you Mr. Nobody?

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

>This is a NEWS group. I posted some news. Get the fuck over it.






Sorry old sock. You didn't post "news", you posted a lie.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
J

John B. Slocomb

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users


>>

>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>

>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>

>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

>When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?






What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.



Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

how you could know much about them.



Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
A

Alias

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:26:47 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>>>>> article:

>>>>

>>>> No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

>>> Headline.


>>

>> False.

>>

>>>

>>> Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

>>> they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....


>>

>> So what?

>>

>>>

>>> You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

>>> you Mr. Nobody?

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>>

>> This is a NEWS group. I posted some news. Get the fuck over it.


>

>

> Sorry old sock. You didn't post "news", you posted a lie.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)




You wish.



--

Alias
 
A

Alias

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>

>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>

>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>

>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>>

>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?


>

>

> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.




How clueless can you get?



>

> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

> how you could know much about them.




I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.



>

> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)




I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments which

is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.



--

Alias
 
J

John B. Slocomb

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:32 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>

>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>

>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>

>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?


>>

>>

>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.


>

>How clueless can you get?

>

>>

>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>> how you could know much about them.


>

>I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.






Apparently a short memory as you just got done telling me that you had

used Ubuntu for what? Two years and had no experience with other

operating systems.



Now you date way back to 1984.



Obviously not an expert even in your own history.

>>

>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

>I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments which

>is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.


John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
A

Alias

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:32 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>

>>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>>

>>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>>

>>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?

>>>

>>>

>>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.


>>

>> How clueless can you get?

>>

>>>

>>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>>> how you could know much about them.


>>

>> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.


>

>

> Apparently a short memory as you just got done telling me that you had

> used Ubuntu for what? Two years and had no experience with other

> operating systems.




I didn't post that. That came from your desperate imagination. I did

post that I've only used Ubuntu for three and a half years so you got

that part right.



>

> Now you date way back to 1984.

>

> Obviously not an expert even in your own history.




You obviously have a reading comprehension problem.



>>>

>>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>>

>> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments which

>> is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.


> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)






--

Alias
 
H

Heywood Jablowme

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqmjta$6er$2@news.eternal-september.org...

> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>>>> article:

>>>

>>> No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>>>


>>

>> Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

>> Headline.


>

> False.

>

>>

>> Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

>> they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....


>

> So what?

>

>>

>> You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

>> you Mr. Nobody?

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

> This is a NEWS group. I posted some news. Get the fuck over it.

>

> --

> Alias




CORRECTION: This is a NEWS group. Alias posted some bullshit.
 
H

Heywood Jablowme

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqmnr2$upn$2@news.eternal-september.org...

> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:26:47 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:51:09 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:hqk81p$6ff$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You say Linux "HAS" over 12 million users. This is a quote from the

>>>>>> article:

>>>>>

>>>>> No, *I* didn't say that. I copied the title of the article, dumb fuck.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well, at last the group idiot has confessed. He only reads the

>>>> Headline.

>>>

>>> False.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Never mind the body of the story, where the guy quoted admits that

>>>> they really don't know how many copies of the system are running....

>>>

>>> So what?

>>>

>>>>

>>>> You certainly go out of your way to prove that you are a fool, don't

>>>> you Mr. Nobody?

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> This is a NEWS group. I posted some news. Get the fuck over it.


>>

>>

>> Sorry old sock. You didn't post "news", you posted a lie.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

> You wish.

>


No - You posted a lie you IDIOT. You probably don't understand what you

posted so I suggest printing this out and taking it to someone who can

explain it to you. Please allow 8-10 hours for the explanation to sink in

to your thick skull.
 
H

Heywood Jablowme

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqmnu5$upn$3@news.eternal-september.org...

> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>

>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>

>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>

>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?


>>

>>

>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.


>

> How clueless can you get?

>

>>

>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>> how you could know much about them.


>

> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.




That long? You still don't have any clue do you? Oops.



>

>>

>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>

> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments which

> is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.

>


You did make a comment when you posted you RETARD. Are you saying that the

subject line is not part of your comment? Oh you use Ubuntu so you are 100%

clueless! LOL!
 
A

Alias

Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hqmnu5$upn$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>>

>>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that for

>>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>>

>>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?

>>>

>>>

>>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.


>>

>> How clueless can you get?

>>

>>>

>>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>>> how you could know much about them.


>>

>> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.


>

> That long? You still don't have any clue do you? Oops.

>

>>

>>>

>>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


>>

>> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments

>> which is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.

>>


> You did make a comment when you posted you RETARD. Are you saying that

> the subject line is not part of your comment? Oh you use Ubuntu so you

> are 100% clueless! LOL!

>

>

>




The Subject line was the title of the Article. Too bad you're too

fucking stupid and couldn't figure that out but don't blame your

stupidity on me.



--

Alias
 
H

Heywood Jablowme

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqn7ef$62k$3@news.eternal-september.org...

> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hqmnu5$upn$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse that

>>>>>> for

>>>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the fact

>>>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>>>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.

>>>

>>> How clueless can you get?

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>>>> how you could know much about them.

>>>

>>> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.


>>

>> That long? You still don't have any clue do you? Oops.

>>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments

>>> which is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.

>>>


>> You did make a comment when you posted you RETARD. Are you saying that

>> the subject line is not part of your comment? Oh you use Ubuntu so you

>> are 100% clueless! LOL!

>>

>>

>>


>

> The Subject line was the title of the Article. Too bad you're too fucking

> stupid and couldn't figure that out but don't blame your stupidity on me.

>

> --

> Alias




You wrote the subject as if it were gospel even if you copied it. Damn you

are extra stupid today. I suggest that you slow down on the drug use.
 
A

Alias

Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hqn7ef$62k$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hqmnu5$upn$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months will

>>>>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse

>>>>>>> that for

>>>>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is at

>>>>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the

>>>>>> fact

>>>>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>>>>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.

>>>>

>>>> How clueless can you get?

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to understand

>>>>> how you could know much about them.

>>>>

>>>> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.

>>>

>>> That long? You still don't have any clue do you? Oops.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments

>>>> which is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.

>>>>

>>> You did make a comment when you posted you RETARD. Are you saying that

>>> the subject line is not part of your comment? Oh you use Ubuntu so you

>>> are 100% clueless! LOL!

>>>

>>>

>>>


>>

>> The Subject line was the title of the Article. Too bad you're too

>> fucking stupid and couldn't figure that out but don't blame your

>> stupidity on me.

>>

>> --

>> Alias


>

> You wrote the subject as if it were gospel even if you copied it. Damn

> you are extra stupid today. I suggest that you slow down on the drug use.

>

>

>




I put the title of the article on ALL the articles I posted. Too bad

you're too stupid to have figured that out and, instead, lamely tried to

discredit me for what someone else wrote.



--

Alias
 
H

Heywood Jablowme

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hqnabv$8to$3@news.eternal-september.org...

> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hqn7ef$62k$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:hqmnu5$upn$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:54 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:52:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1600299/ubuntu-linux-million-users

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> The following was reported some two years ago:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "...the install base of windows computers this coming 12 months

>>>>>>>> will

>>>>>>>> reach 1 billion. If you stop and just think about that, parse

>>>>>>>> that for

>>>>>>>> a second, by the end of our fiscal year '08, there will be more PCs

>>>>>>>> running windows in the world than there are automobiles, which is

>>>>>>>> at

>>>>>>>> least to me kind of a mind-numbing concept. "

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Makes your figures a bit pathetic, doesn't it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> When you consider the sleazy way Microsoft got those numbers, the

>>>>>>> fact

>>>>>>> that you support them is a bit pathetic, isn't it?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> What "sleazy" way was that? Ah, the big, bad Microsoft. I remember

>>>>>> them when they were a little one horse outfit in New Mexico.

>>>>>

>>>>> How clueless can you get?

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Given your very limited exposure to computers it is hard to

>>>>>> understand

>>>>>> how you could know much about them.

>>>>>

>>>>> I've been using computers since 1984. Oops.

>>>>

>>>> That long? You still don't have any clue do you? Oops.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Oh yes, your "news", right? Read the headline and you know it all.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> I made no comment when I posted that. You are assuming my comments

>>>>> which is pretty pathetic and a very amateurish way of debating.

>>>>>

>>>> You did make a comment when you posted you RETARD. Are you saying that

>>>> the subject line is not part of your comment? Oh you use Ubuntu so you

>>>> are 100% clueless! LOL!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> The Subject line was the title of the Article. Too bad you're too

>>> fucking stupid and couldn't figure that out but don't blame your

>>> stupidity on me.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> You wrote the subject as if it were gospel even if you copied it. Damn

>> you are extra stupid today. I suggest that you slow down on the drug use.

>>

>>

>>


>

> I put the title of the article on ALL the articles I posted. Too bad

> you're too stupid to have figured that out and, instead, lamely tried to

> discredit me for what someone else wrote.

>

> --

> Alias




Well then, I suggest that you do not post lies and do not copy the title of

articles that post lies. That would resolve the issue now wouldn't it?
 
Back
Top Bottom