Which xbuntu should I pick? You mean there are choices? LOL!

[Heywood Jablowme]

http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu







Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the difference?

Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same Linux distro using

the same base, the same software repositories, and the same release cycle.

They just have different artwork, different user interfaces (in most cases),

and different default programs installed.



So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of some

idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included in one

stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu are piles

of SHIT!



Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

 

[Heywood Jablowme]

"Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>

>

>

> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the difference?

> Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same Linux distro using

> the same base, the same software repositories, and the same release cycle.

> They just have different artwork, different user interfaces (in most

> cases), and different default programs installed.

>



Different default programs installed? How do I know which default programs

I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I boot, switch to

see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu is free so this

shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.



No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu really

sucks.







> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included in

> one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu are

> piles of SHIT!

>

> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>

>

>

 

[ray]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:



> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>

>>

>>

>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>> installed.

>>

>>

> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu is

> free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.



You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ would

know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily install

the programs he wanted that were not included by default.



BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

(I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

which interface you want at login time - not boot time.





>

> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

> really sucks.



FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

though, sometimes move to a different distribution.





>

>

>

>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

>> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included

>> in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or

>> Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>

>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>

>>

>>

 

[ray]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:



> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>

>

>

> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different user

> interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs installed.

>

> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included

> in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu

> are piles of SHIT!

>

> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.



I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

 

[Ken Blake]

On 21 Apr 2010 21:32:24 GMT, ray wrote:





> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

> beginning, home, business, ultimate







To clarify things here, those are not the choices (only one of them,

Ultimate, is). Here's the complete list:



Starter

Home Basic

Home Premium

Professional

Ultimate

Enterprise.



And to customers in the USA buying a copy, the only available choices

on the list are Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate.

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003

 

[Frank]

On 4/21/2010 2:22 PM, ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>> installed.

>>>

>>>

>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

>> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

>> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu is

>> free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>

> You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ would

> know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily install

> the programs he wanted that were not included by default.

>

> BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

> (I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

> which interface you want at login time - not boot time.

>

>

>>

>> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

>> really sucks.

>

> FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

> though, sometimes move to a different distribution.

>

>

Of course, you're referring to yourself.

Figures!

>>

>>

>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

>>> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included

>>> in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or

>>> Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>

>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>

 

[Heywood Jablowme]

"ray" wrote in message

news:8398kdFhp0U59@mid.individual.net...

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>> installed.

>>>

>>>

>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

>> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

>> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu is

>> free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>

> You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ would

> know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily install

> the programs he wanted that were not included by default.

>



So Mr. Brilliant, which one would you install? Without researching all

those INFERIOR versions, how do you know which DEFAULT programs are

included? Isn't the install just a click? Aren't the "default" programs

installed by default? Come on now Mr. Brains, which is it? You only wish

your IQ could reach room temperature! LOL!











> BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

> (I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

> which interface you want at login time - not boot time.

>

>

>>

>> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

>> really sucks.

>

> FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

> though, sometimes move to a different distribution.

>

I knew you would say something stupid like that. Of course you won't admit

it. I am sure you don't know most of the inhabitants on the planet do you?

I'll bet you don't know 99.999% of the people in Los Angeles or Ventura

County, California. You sure are an idiot.

No wonder, you use Ubuntu!!!!

 

[Heywood Jablowme]

"ray" wrote in message

news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>

>>

>>

>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different user

>> interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs installed.

>>

>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

>> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all included

>> in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu

>> are piles of SHIT!

>>

>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>

> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?



Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default programs.

You don't have to research with cryptic program gets installed. Do I use

GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!

 

[DanS]

ray wrote in

news:8398kdFhp0U59@mid.individual.net:



> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu?

>>> What's the difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and

>>> Edubuntu are all the same Linux distro using the same

>>> base, the same software repositories, and the same

>>> release cycle. They just have different artwork,

>>> different user interfaces (in most cases), and different

>>> default programs installed.

>>>

>>>

>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which

>> default programs I need? Maybe I should install all

>> versions and each time I boot, switch to see which default

>> programs I need. You know, Ubuntu is free so this

>> shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>

> You could certainly do that, but a person with room

> temperature IQ would know what 'default' means and how to

> simply, quickly and easily install the programs he wanted

> that were not included by default.



The problem is, the nymshifter has a room temp IQ....in

celcius.

 

[ray]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:14:23 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:



> "ray" wrote in message

> news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>

>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>> installed.

>>>

>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

>>> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all

>>> included in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu,

>>> or Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>

>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>

>> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

>> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

>

> Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default

> programs. You don't have to research with cryptic program gets

> installed. Do I use GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!



Gee and I thought the different versions had different capabilities -

read different applications. How silly of me.

 

[ray]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:13:19 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:



> "ray" wrote in message

> news:8398kdFhp0U59@mid.individual.net...

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>

>>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>>> installed.

>>>>

>>>>

>>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

>>> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

>>> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu

>>> is free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>>

>> You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ

>> would know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily

>> install the programs he wanted that were not included by default.

>>

>>

> So Mr. Brilliant, which one would you install? Without researching all

> those INFERIOR versions, how do you know which DEFAULT programs are

> included? Isn't the install just a click? Aren't the "default"

> programs installed by default? Come on now Mr. Brains, which is it?

> You only wish your IQ could reach room temperature! LOL!

>

>

>



I would not necessarily choose any version of ubuntu - it would depend on

what I was trying to accomplish on what platform. One recent install I

did was the wife's netbook - I did a Debian net install.



I guess you still don't understand the concept of 'default', so I won't

try to explain it again.



>

>

>> BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

>> (I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

>> which interface you want at login time - not boot time.

>>

>>

>>

>>> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

>>> really sucks.

>>

>> FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

>> though, sometimes move to a different distribution.

>>

> I knew you would say something stupid like that. Of course you won't

> admit it. I am sure you don't know most of the inhabitants on the

> planet do you? I'll bet you don't know 99.999% of the people in Los

> Angeles or Ventura County, California. You sure are an idiot. No

> wonder, you use Ubuntu!!!!



I did not claim no one ever switched back did I? I see you have the same

reading comprehension problems as frankie and billie. Try READING what I

said - or find a third grader to help you understand it.

 

[Frank]

On 4/21/2010 5:08 PM, ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:13:19 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "ray" wrote in message

>> news:8398kdFhp0U59@mid.individual.net...

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>>>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>>>> installed.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

>>>> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

>>>> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu

>>>> is free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>>>

>>> You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ

>>> would know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily

>>> install the programs he wanted that were not included by default.

>>>

>>>

>> So Mr. Brilliant, which one would you install? Without researching all

>> those INFERIOR versions, how do you know which DEFAULT programs are

>> included? Isn't the install just a click? Aren't the "default"

>> programs installed by default? Come on now Mr. Brains, which is it?

>> You only wish your IQ could reach room temperature! LOL!

>>

>>

>>

>

> I would not necessarily choose any version of ubuntu - it would depend on

> what I was trying to accomplish on what platform. One recent install I

> did was the wife's netbook - I did a Debian net install.

>

> I guess you still don't understand the concept of 'default', so I won't

> try to explain it again.

>

>>

>>

>>> BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

>>> (I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

>>> which interface you want at login time - not boot time.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

>>>> really sucks.

>>>

>>> FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

>>> though, sometimes move to a different distribution.

>>>

>> I knew you would say something stupid like that. Of course you won't

>> admit it. I am sure you don't know most of the inhabitants on the

>> planet do you? I'll bet you don't know 99.999% of the people in Los

>> Angeles or Ventura County, California. You sure are an idiot. No

>> wonder, you use Ubuntu!!!!

>

> I did not claim no one ever switched back did I?



Why are you here? To make a fool out of yourself? To prove you can lie

and then lie about lying?



I see you have the same

> reading comprehension problems as frankie and billie.



Sorry asshole, but we all can clearly understand that you hate MS, don't

use their products and are here simply to be a lying lintud FUD

spreading troll along with your friend, alias the pimp.



Try READING what I

> said - or find a third grader to help you understand it.



Try explaining WTF you're doing in here. You have no legitimate reason

for posting your linux shit in this W 7 ng.

 

[Frank]

On 4/21/2010 5:05 PM, ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:14:23 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "ray" wrote in message

>> news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>>> installed.

>>>>

>>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because of

>>>> some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all

>>>> included in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu,

>>>> or Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>>

>>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>>

>>> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

>>> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

>>

>> Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default

>> programs. You don't have to research with cryptic program gets

>> installed. Do I use GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!

>

> Gee and I thought the different versions had different capabilities -

> read different applications. How silly of me.



Yeah, you are that stupid!

 

[ray]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:17:52 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/21/2010 5:05 PM, ray wrote:

>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:14:23 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>

>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>> news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories,

>>>>> and the same release cycle. They just have different artwork,

>>>>> different user interfaces (in most cases), and different default

>>>>> programs installed.

>>>>>

>>>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because

>>>>> of some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all

>>>>> included in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu,

>>>>> Xubuntu, or Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>>>

>>>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>>>

>>>> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

>>>> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

>>>

>>> Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default

>>> programs. You don't have to research with cryptic program gets

>>> installed. Do I use GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!

>>

>> Gee and I thought the different versions had different capabilities -

>> read different applications. How silly of me.

>

> Yeah, you are that stupid!



So you're trying to tell me that the 'starter' version has all the

capabilities of 'ultimate'? Then why pay more? And you call ME stupid!

 

[Frank]

On 4/21/2010 5:40 PM, ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:17:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/21/2010 5:05 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:14:23 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories,

>>>>>> and the same release cycle. They just have different artwork,

>>>>>> different user interfaces (in most cases), and different default

>>>>>> programs installed.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because

>>>>>> of some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all

>>>>>> included in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu,

>>>>>> Xubuntu, or Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>>>>

>>>>> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

>>>>> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

>>>>

>>>> Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default

>>>> programs. You don't have to research with cryptic program gets

>>>> installed. Do I use GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!

>>>

>>> Gee and I thought the different versions had different capabilities -

>>> read different applications. How silly of me.

>>

>> Yeah, you are that stupid!

>

> So you're trying to tell me that the 'starter' version has all the

> capabilities of 'ultimate'? Then why pay more? And you call ME stupid!



No you dumb ass. I'm laughing at the ironic fact that you don't even

know the MS line up!

Oops!...LOL!

 

[Alias]

ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:13:19 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>

>> "ray" wrote in message

>> news:8398kdFhp0U59@mid.individual.net...

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:25 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>> "Heywood Jablowme" wrote in message

>>>> news:4bcf6217@news.x-privat.org...

>>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories, and

>>>>> the same release cycle. They just have different artwork, different

>>>>> user interfaces (in most cases), and different default programs

>>>>> installed.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>> Different default programs installed? How do I know which default

>>>> programs I need? Maybe I should install all versions and each time I

>>>> boot, switch to see which default programs I need. You know, Ubuntu

>>>> is free so this shouldn't take but 36 hours or so.

>>>

>>> You could certainly do that, but a person with room temperature IQ

>>> would know what 'default' means and how to simply, quickly and easily

>>> install the programs he wanted that were not included by default.

>>>

>>>

>> So Mr. Brilliant, which one would you install? Without researching all

>> those INFERIOR versions, how do you know which DEFAULT programs are

>> included? Isn't the install just a click? Aren't the "default"

>> programs installed by default? Come on now Mr. Brains, which is it?

>> You only wish your IQ could reach room temperature! LOL!

>>

>>

>>

>

> I would not necessarily choose any version of ubuntu - it would depend on

> what I was trying to accomplish on what platform. One recent install I

> did was the wife's netbook - I did a Debian net install.

>

> I guess you still don't understand the concept of 'default', so I won't

> try to explain it again.

>

>>

>>

>>> BTW - you can also easily install the packages that make those variants

>>> (I don't consider them to be distinct distributions) so you can choose

>>> which interface you want at login time - not boot time.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> No wonder why so many people ditch Ubuntu once they try it. Ubuntu

>>>> really sucks.

>>>

>>> FWIW - I've never known anyone to try Linux and go back to MS. They do,

>>> though, sometimes move to a different distribution.

>>>

>> I knew you would say something stupid like that. Of course you won't

>> admit it. I am sure you don't know most of the inhabitants on the

>> planet do you? I'll bet you don't know 99.999% of the people in Los

>> Angeles or Ventura County, California. You sure are an idiot. No

>> wonder, you use Ubuntu!!!!

>

> I did not claim no one ever switched back did I? I see you have the same

> reading comprehension problems as frankie and billie. Try READING what I

> said - or find a third grader to help you understand it.



You are replying to the same person as Bill Yanaire, Spanky the Monkey, etc.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

ray wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:17:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/21/2010 5:05 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:14:23 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:839978Fhp0U60@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:45 -0700, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/whichbuntu

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Should I use Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, or Edubuntu? What's the

>>>>>> difference? Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all the same

>>>>>> Linux distro using the same base, the same software repositories,

>>>>>> and the same release cycle. They just have different artwork,

>>>>>> different user interfaces (in most cases), and different default

>>>>>> programs installed.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So you are telling me that I can install different versions because

>>>>>> of some idiotic artwork and user interfaces? Why aren't they all

>>>>>> included in one stinking OS? No wonder why Ubuntu, Kubuntu,

>>>>>> Xubuntu, or Edubuntu are piles of SHIT!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Very confusing to the new user. Oops.

>>>>>

>>>>> I can see how that would be nearly as confusing as selecting a win7:

>>>>> beginning, home, business, ultimate 32bit or 64bit upgrade or full?

>>>>

>>>> Hey dipshit - With Windows 7 any version, you get the same default

>>>> programs. You don't have to research with cryptic program gets

>>>> installed. Do I use GIMP or not use GIMP! LOL!

>>>

>>> Gee and I thought the different versions had different capabilities -

>>> read different applications. How silly of me.

>>

>> Yeah, you are that stupid!

>

> So you're trying to tell me that the 'starter' version has all the

> capabilities of 'ultimate'? Then why pay more? And you call ME stupid!



No, of course Ultimate has more capabilities than Starter. They're just

pulling your chain with lies made up to suit the "argument".



--

Alias

 

[Lucid?]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:52:19 +0200, Alias

wrote:





>

>You are replying to the same person as Bill Yanaire, Spanky the Monkey, etc.





Or maybe Gary "++flatfish++" Stewart?