ram

[housetrained]

what's it to be

Corsair dominator 2x2 GB

or

Kingston Hyperx 2x2 GB

any comments [clean only - no trolling]



--

John the West Ham fan



housetrained@hotmail.com

 

[Gordon]

"housetrained" wrote in message

news:4be3bac7$0$30356$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

> what's it to be

> Corsair dominator 2x2 GB

> or

> Kingston Hyperx 2x2 GB

> any comments [clean only - no trolling]

>



What does Crucial.com recommend? (I'd go with that....)

 

[Jackie]

Exactly what is the question, and how does this relate to Windows 7?





--

--------------------------------- --- -- -

Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Beta 17 (Release Candidate 4)

Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet

------------------- ----- ---- -- -

 

[ray]

On Fri, 07 May 2010 08:01:33 +0100, housetrained wrote:



> what's it to be

> Corsair dominator 2x2 GB

> or

> Kingston Hyperx 2x2 GB

> any comments [clean only - no trolling]



I go the least expensive - always worked in the past.

 

[housetrained]

PAMHA

--

John the West Ham fan



housetrained@hotmail.com

<





"Jackie" wrote in message

news:4be3c573$0$5689$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

> Exactly what is the question, and how does this relate to Windows 7?

>

>

> --

> --------------------------------- --- -- -

> Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Beta 17 (Release Candidate 4)

> Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet

> ------------------- ----- ---- -- -

>

 

[housetrained]

funnily [or not maybe] crucial go with PC2-6400 yet thought 8500 would be

better but perhaps my MB is best with 6400???





"Gordon" wrote in message

news:hs0e9f$csl$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>

> "housetrained" wrote in message

> news:4be3bac7$0$30356$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

>> what's it to be

>> Corsair dominator 2x2 GB

>> or

>> Kingston Hyperx 2x2 GB

>> any comments [clean only - no trolling]

>>

>

> What does Crucial.com recommend? (I'd go with that....)

>

>

 

[John]

housetrained wrote:

> funnily [or not maybe] crucial go with PC2-6400 yet thought 8500

> would be better but perhaps my MB is best with 6400???



Depends if your motherboard (which, very helpfully, you didn't identify for

us) can handle the 8500. If it can't, it'll run at the same speed as the

6400 anyway. If it can then go for the 8500.



>

> "Gordon" wrote in message

> news:hs0e9f$csl$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>

>> "housetrained" wrote in message

>> news:4be3bac7$0$30356$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

>>> what's it to be

>>> Corsair dominator 2x2 GB

>>> or

>>> Kingston Hyperx 2x2 GB

>>> any comments [clean only - no trolling]

>>>

>>

>> What does Crucial.com recommend? (I'd go with that....)

 

[Jackie]

What's more important are the timings. Both are good but you should go with highest speeds with

lowest timings. If you have memory installed already, there are more things to consider (like the

operating voltage on the modules). I have 4x HyperX modules. 1 GB each. A pair of PC9600 needing

2.3V and a pair of PC8500 needing 2.2V. The voltages may be slightly off but at least they are different.

Kingston is good so I manually set the speed to PC8500 (1066 MHz) and the voltage to 2.2V for both

pairs. With just the PC9600 pair, I managed to get CL3 timings which is very good. Can't get them that

low with an additional pair.





--

--------------------------------- --- -- -

Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Beta 17 (Release Candidate 4)

Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet

------------------- ----- ---- -- -