And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like the
version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman catches my
statements, lol).
Heather
"Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
> Joan
>
>
> Alias wrote:
>> Get it at www.java.com
>>
>> Alias
>
>
Heather wrote:
> And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like the
> version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman catches my
> statements, lol).
>
> Heather
>
> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
>> Joan
>>
>>
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Get it at www.java.com
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>
>
For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
I already have that version installed and will keep it, accordingly.
Harry.
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OKGjbYjxHHA.4392@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Heather,
>
> If you're going to stay with JRE 1.5.0, it's probably best to use
> 1.5.0_12. IIRC there were a number of security vulnerabilites fixed in
> this release.
>
> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> Cheers,
> Tom (not David Lipman ))
>
>
> Heather wrote:
> > And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like the
> > version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman catches my
> > statements, lol).
> >
> > Heather
> >
> > "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> > news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >> I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
> >> Joan
> >>
> >>
> >> Alias wrote:
> >>> Get it at www.java.com
> >>>
> >>> Alias
> >>
> >
> >
webster72n wrote:
> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
Who are "they"?
> I already have that version installed and will keep it, accordingly.
>
> Harry.
I have an AMD processor (XP 2200, XP 3000+ and AMD2 4600) on three
computers and all three have the latest Java RE 6, Update 2 with no
problems whatsoever. Two are running XP Pro in English and the dual core
is running XP Home in Spanish.
Alias
>
>
> "TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:OKGjbYjxHHA.4392@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Hi, Heather,
>>
>> If you're going to stay with JRE 1.5.0, it's probably best to use
>> 1.5.0_12. IIRC there were a number of security vulnerabilites fixed in
>> this release.
>>
>> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom (not David Lipman ))
>>
>>
>> Heather wrote:
>>> And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like the
>>> version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman catches my
>>> statements, lol).
>>>
>>> Heather
>>>
>>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
>>>> Joan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> Get it at www.java.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>
>
>
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> webster72n wrote:
> > For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>
> Who are "they"?
"They" are: www.java.com.
Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>
> > I already have that version installed and will keep it, accordingly.
> >
> > Harry.
>
> I have an AMD processor (XP 2200, XP 3000+ and AMD2 4600) on three
> computers and all three have the latest Java RE 6, Update 2 with no
> problems whatsoever. Two are running XP Pro in English and the dual core
> is running XP Home in Spanish.
>
> Alias
> >
> >
> > "TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:OKGjbYjxHHA.4392@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi, Heather,
> >>
> >> If you're going to stay with JRE 1.5.0, it's probably best to use
> >> 1.5.0_12. IIRC there were a number of security vulnerabilites fixed in
> >> this release.
> >>
> >> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
> >> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom (not David Lipman ))
> >>
> >>
> >> Heather wrote:
> >>> And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like the
> >>> version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman catches my
> >>> statements, lol).
> >>>
> >>> Heather
> >>>
> >>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >>>> I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
> >>>> Joan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Alias wrote:
> >>>>> Get it at www.java.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alias
> >>>
> >
> >
Thanks, my dear......what would I do without you re Java and Firefox,
lol. I have now downloaded it and will install it later.
Hope all is well with you. Just got back from (horrors!!) Europe.
Portugal to be exact. Didn't meet up with any loudmouths like Norman M.
though......unfortunately it is his type that travels usually and gives
the nice guys like you a bad name. 8-((
Cheers....Heather
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OKGjbYjxHHA.4392@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Heather,
>
> If you're going to stay with JRE 1.5.0, it's probably best to use
> 1.5.0_12. IIRC there were a number of security vulnerabilites fixed
> in this release.
>
> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> Cheers,
> Tom (not David Lipman ))
>
>
> Heather wrote:
>> And I will stick with version 5.....11. Does the job. Don't like
>> the version 6 ones. (looking over my shoulder to see if Lipman
>> catches my statements, lol).
>>
>> Heather
>>
>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>> news:uqHMT0gxHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> I can give that a miss, I don't have Sun Java on here <g>
>>> Joan
>>>
>>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Get it at www.java.com
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>
"webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eQGVnLkxHHA.3328@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> webster72n wrote:
>> > For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>>
>> Who are "they"?
>
> "They" are: www.java.com.
> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
Damned if I can find these people.......the "theys" he refers to. I
checked under Download and Installation and no Theys there.
webster72n wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> webster72n wrote:
>>> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>> Who are "they"?
>
> "They" are: www.java.com.
> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>
Harry,
I don't know what you're referring to on the page. Perhaps you could
"summarize that." Why would Sun recommend a version with security
vulnerabilities for AMD processor based systems? It doesn't make sense.
From the page you referenced:
"Intel and 100% compatible processors are supported."
Better tread carefully here, after all Harry is a known expert
with Java, he does have 3386 versions of it in Add/Remove programs.
George Gee
"Heather" <figgyd@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:%23SdUlOlxHHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eQGVnLkxHHA.3328@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> webster72n wrote:
>>> > For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>>>
>>> Who are "they"?
>>
>> "They" are: www.java.com.
>> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
>> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>
> Damned if I can find these people.......the "theys" he refers to. I
> checked under Download and Installation and no Theys there.
>
> You into the cooking sherry again, Harry??
>
I'm well, thank you. I had seen a couple of your posts that you were
traveling in Portugal. Was it not a good trip? Or are you referring to
some of the recent goings on in London and Glasgow?
I had something of the wanderlust this morning and was looking at photos
of Venice. I've been there twice, and for some reason I found myself
very much drawn to it today. Maybe I had a role in the Inquisition in a
past life. )
I hope you're well.
Cheers,
Tom
Heather wrote:
> Thanks, my dear......what would I do without you re Java and Firefox,
> lol. I have now downloaded it and will install it later.
>
> Hope all is well with you. Just got back from (horrors!!) Europe.
> Portugal to be exact. Didn't meet up with any loudmouths like Norman M.
> though......unfortunately it is his type that travels usually and gives
> the nice guys like you a bad name. 8-((
>
> Cheers....Heather
>
> "TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:OKGjbYjxHHA.4392@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Hi, Heather,
>>
>> If you're going to stay with JRE 1.5.0, it's probably best to use
>> 1.5.0_12. IIRC there were a number of security vulnerabilites fixed
>> in this release.
>>
>> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom (not David Lipman ))
You said, referring to Harry......."It doesn't make sense". I rest my
case, counsellor. (G)
I gave him an easy out with the 'cooking sherry'.
Figgs
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ORsc7VlxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> webster72n wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> webster72n wrote:
>>>> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>>> Who are "they"?
>>
>> "They" are: www.java.com.
>> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
>> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>>
>
> Harry,
>
> I don't know what you're referring to on the page. Perhaps you could
> "summarize that." Why would Sun recommend a version with security
> vulnerabilities for AMD processor based systems? It doesn't make
> sense.
>
> From the page you referenced:
>
> "Intel and 100% compatible processors are supported."
>
> Tom
And Hi Stranger.....you will have to drop in more often. Even as your
alter ego. Harry something or other. LOL.
Heather
"George Gee" <georgegee@nomaps.com> wrote in message
news:ua8qoblxHHA.4916@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Heather
>
> Better tread carefully here, after all Harry is a known expert
> with Java, he does have 3386 versions of it in Add/Remove programs.
>
> George Gee
>
>
> "Heather" <figgyd@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:%23SdUlOlxHHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eQGVnLkxHHA.3328@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> webster72n wrote:
>>>> > For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11,
>>>> > TomV.
>>>>
>>>> Who are "they"?
>>>
>>> "They" are: www.java.com.
>>> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
>>> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>>
>> Damned if I can find these people.......the "theys" he refers to. I
>> checked under Download and Installation and no Theys there.
>>
>> You into the cooking sherry again, Harry??
>>
>
>
Uner "Download and Install", after clicking on the "Download" button, you'll
find a note saying "for AMD based Windows systems use version
'jre-1.5.0_11-amd64.exe'. My system happens to be AMD-based.
That should clear it up for you, Tom.
As for Heather and George,
I wonder who is drinking what and in how many "versions"?
Harry.
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ORsc7VlxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> webster72n wrote:
> > "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
> > news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >> webster72n wrote:
> >>> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
> >> Who are "they"?
> >
> > "They" are: www.java.com.
> > Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
> > Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
> >
>
> Harry,
>
> I don't know what you're referring to on the page. Perhaps you could
> "summarize that." Why would Sun recommend a version with security
> vulnerabilities for AMD processor based systems? It doesn't make sense.
>
> From the page you referenced:
>
> "Intel and 100% compatible processors are supported."
>
> Tom
That's for a 64 bit Windows system with an AMD processor. If your OS is
Windows ME, it's not 64 bit. And update 12
(jre-1_5_0_12-windows-amd64.exe) is available for 64 bit systems as well.
webster72n wrote:
> Tom:
>
> Uner "Download and Install", after clicking on the "Download" button, you'll
> find a note saying "for AMD based Windows systems use version
> 'jre-1.5.0_11-amd64.exe'. My system happens to be AMD-based.
> That should clear it up for you, Tom.
> As for Heather and George,
> I wonder who is drinking what and in how many "versions"?
>
> Harry.
>
>
> "TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:ORsc7VlxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> webster72n wrote:
>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> webster72n wrote:
>>>>> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>>>> Who are "they"?
>>> "They" are: www.java.com.
>>> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
>>> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>>>
>> Harry,
>>
>> I don't know what you're referring to on the page. Perhaps you could
>> "summarize that." Why would Sun recommend a version with security
>> vulnerabilities for AMD processor based systems? It doesn't make sense.
>>
>> From the page you referenced:
>>
>> "Intel and 100% compatible processors are supported."
>>
>> Tom
>
>
Unfortunately, the link I posted won't work. You can find it using the
download link I posted for Heather. Click "Download" for the JRE. It's
at the bottom of the page.
TomV wrote:
> Harry,
>
> That's for a 64 bit Windows system with an AMD processor. If your OS is
> Windows ME, it's not 64 bit. And update 12
> (jre-1_5_0_12-windows-amd64.exe) is available for 64 bit systems as well.
>
> Here's the link (it's at the bottom of the page):
>
> https://sdlc4a.sun.com/ECom/EComActionServletjsessionid=9C407621F522C7231084311AD6DC3A2D
>
>
> Tom
You mean Harry got it wrong?
Well, well, well, fancy that, tisk, tisk, tisk.
Can't find that blasted corkscrew! Only had it
half an hour ago ........
George Gee
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OSo9MzlxHHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Harry,
>
> That's for a 64 bit Windows system with an AMD processor. If your OS is
> Windows ME, it's not 64 bit. And update 12
> (jre-1_5_0_12-windows-amd64.exe) is available for 64 bit systems as well.
>
> Here's the link (it's at the bottom of the page):
>
> https://sdlc4a.sun.com/ECom/EComActionServletjsessionid=9C407621F522C7231084311AD6DC3A2D
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> webster72n wrote:
>> Tom:
>>
>> Uner "Download and Install", after clicking on the "Download" button,
>> you'll
>> find a note saying "for AMD based Windows systems use version
>> 'jre-1.5.0_11-amd64.exe'. My system happens to be AMD-based.
>> That should clear it up for you, Tom.
>> As for Heather and George,
>> I wonder who is drinking what and in how many "versions"?
>>
>> Harry.
>>
>>
>> "TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:ORsc7VlxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> webster72n wrote:
>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>> news:OZAHfBkxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> webster72n wrote:
>>>>>> For AMD based windows systems they recommend to use 1.5.0_11, TomV.
>>>>> Who are "they"?
>>>> "They" are: www.java.com.
>>>> Just look under :"instructions" for download and installation.
>>>> Thought you might summarize that, Alias.
>>>>
>>> Harry,
>>>
>>> I don't know what you're referring to on the page. Perhaps you could
>>> "summarize that." Why would Sun recommend a version with security
>>> vulnerabilities for AMD processor based systems? It doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>> From the page you referenced:
>>>
>>> "Intel and 100% compatible processors are supported."
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
It may help to explain the reason there are 3386 versions of it in
Add/Remove programs. )
George Gee wrote:
> You mean Harry got it wrong?
> Well, well, well, fancy that, tisk, tisk, tisk.
>
> Can't find that blasted corkscrew! Only had it
> half an hour ago ........
>
> George Gee
>
>
're you on the binge too, Tom?
As long as you're having fun...
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ePZOUGmxHHA.404@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> It may help to explain the reason there are 3386 versions of it in
> Add/Remove programs. )
>
> George Gee wrote:
> > You mean Harry got it wrong?
> > Well, well, well, fancy that, tisk, tisk, tisk.
> >
> > Can't find that blasted corkscrew! Only had it
> > half an hour ago ........
> >
> > George Gee
> >
> >
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.