hijackthis.exe...

R

RJK

hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few hours
ago,
submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
....I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
....it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be adding
something "not nice" to it !
....3 false positives maybe :-

eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)

views please ?

regards, Richard
 
M

MAP

RJK wrote:
> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
> hours ago,
> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
> adding something "not nice" to it !
> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>
> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>
> views please ?
>
> regards, Richard

Version 1.99 also has a false positive
eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm


I would'nt worry about it.
--
Mike Pawlak
 
R

RJK

....that was my thought as well but, thought it my observation might generate
some usefeul observations !
....in http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30 "Hijackthis Logs" discussion
forum, Bill Castner
....decided to "distort" and "misinterpret" my question and get all sort of
"protective" of Jim Eshelman !
....quite sweet really, though not very useful !

regards, Richard


"MAP" <mikepawlak2REM@OVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23xX0AIjIIHA.3356@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> RJK wrote:
>> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
>> hours ago,
>> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
>> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
>> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
>> adding something "not nice" to it !
>> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>>
>> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
>> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>>
>> views please ?
>>
>> regards, Richard
>
> Version 1.99 also has a false positive
> eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>
>
> I would'nt worry about it.
> --
> Mike Pawlak
>
>
 
R

Robear Dyer

Richard, the thread in question is here: http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=29981

However, you'd now edited all of your posts to the thread in an
apparent effort to cover your mistakes. I'm glad to know that you
cannot do so here.

According to MVP & AumHa VSOP Bill Castner (who was actively
monitoring the thread), in one of your now-edited posts you admitted
that you'd submitted (1) an earlier version of HijackThis (e.g.,
v1.99.1) to VirusTotal and that (2) you had NOT downloaded it from
AumHa Downloads.

As another AumHa VSOP and an AumHa Forums Admin, I demand a public
apology from you, both here and in the forum thread, for besmirching
the reputation of MVP Jim Eshelman and his AumHa website/forums.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security & Shell/User) since 2002
AumHa VSOP and Admin

On Nov 8, 1:14 pm, "RJK" <notatos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ...that was my thought as well but, thought it my observation might generate
> some usefeul observations !
> ...in http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30"Hijackthis Logs" discussion
> forum, Bill Castner
> ...decided to "distort" and "misinterpret" my question and get all sort of
> "protective" of Jim Eshelman !
> ...quite sweet really, though not very useful !
>
> "MAP" <mikepawlak2...@OVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23xX0AIjIIHA.3356@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> > RJK wrote:
> >> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
> >> hours ago,
> >> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
> >> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
> >> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
> >> adding something "not nice" to it !
> >> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>
> >> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
> >> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
> >> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>
> >> views please ?
>
> >> regards, Richard
>
> > Version 1.99 also has a false positive
> > eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>
> > I would'nt worry about it.
 
R

RJK

No,

Obviously Bill Castner either cannot see straight, or chose to distort my
posts right from the start, with a hostile attitude from getgo. Quite why
eludes me.

I collected Hijackthis.exe v2.02 from aumha.org v2.0.2 (file version
2.0.0.2), and just for something to do really, submitted it to the CLS's at
VirusTotal.com, where three of them, didn't like it. This remains fact.
I then submitted an older version of HJT from my PC where only one CLS's
didn't like it. That also remains fact. All of that was accurately
conveyed in my posts, albeit a little jumbled up.
He obviously didn't want to make any constructive comment on that, (which I
thought would have been an interesting topic), but, immediately launched
into a torrent of vitriol ...something like. "...you've publicly accused
aumha of distributing infected software..."

It appears that he was simply unable read something as it was literally and
honestly intended whilst at the same time making wildly fictitious, and
almost abusive assumptions.

I deleted what I could from my posts, and will not go there again, it's
simply not worth wasting breath in there, or on him !

regards, Richard


"Robear Dyer" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194563107.653373.63110@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> Richard, the thread in question is here:
> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=29981
>
> However, you'd now edited all of your posts to the thread in an
> apparent effort to cover your mistakes. I'm glad to know that you
> cannot do so here.
>
> According to MVP & AumHa VSOP Bill Castner (who was actively
> monitoring the thread), in one of your now-edited posts you admitted
> that you'd submitted (1) an earlier version of HijackThis (e.g.,
> v1.99.1) to VirusTotal and that (2) you had NOT downloaded it from
> AumHa Downloads.
>
> As another AumHa VSOP and an AumHa Forums Admin, I demand a public
> apology from you, both here and in the forum thread, for besmirching
> the reputation of MVP Jim Eshelman and his AumHa website/forums.
> --
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security & Shell/User) since 2002
> AumHa VSOP and Admin
>
> On Nov 8, 1:14 pm, "RJK" <notatos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> ...that was my thought as well but, thought it my observation might
>> generate
>> some usefeul observations !
>> ...in http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30"Hijackthis Logs" discussion
>> forum, Bill Castner
>> ...decided to "distort" and "misinterpret" my question and get all sort
>> of
>> "protective" of Jim Eshelman !
>> ...quite sweet really, though not very useful !
>>
>> "MAP" <mikepawlak2...@OVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23xX0AIjIIHA.3356@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>
>> > RJK wrote:
>> >> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
>> >> hours ago,
>> >> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
>> >> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
>> >> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
>> >> adding something "not nice" to it !
>> >> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>>
>> >> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>> >> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
>> >> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>>
>> >> views please ?
>>
>> >> regards, Richard
>>
>> > Version 1.99 also has a false positive
>> > eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>>
>> > I would'nt worry about it.
>
 
R

RJK

I just reread your post.

I am sorry but, I will NOT apologize for something I haven't said or done !

regards, Richard


"Robear Dyer" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194563107.653373.63110@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> Richard, the thread in question is here:
> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=29981
>
> However, you'd now edited all of your posts to the thread in an
> apparent effort to cover your mistakes. I'm glad to know that you
> cannot do so here.
>
> According to MVP & AumHa VSOP Bill Castner (who was actively
> monitoring the thread), in one of your now-edited posts you admitted
> that you'd submitted (1) an earlier version of HijackThis (e.g.,
> v1.99.1) to VirusTotal and that (2) you had NOT downloaded it from
> AumHa Downloads.
>
> As another AumHa VSOP and an AumHa Forums Admin, I demand a public
> apology from you, both here and in the forum thread, for besmirching
> the reputation of MVP Jim Eshelman and his AumHa website/forums.
> --
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security & Shell/User) since 2002
> AumHa VSOP and Admin
>
> On Nov 8, 1:14 pm, "RJK" <notatos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> ...that was my thought as well but, thought it my observation might
>> generate
>> some usefeul observations !
>> ...in http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30"Hijackthis Logs" discussion
>> forum, Bill Castner
>> ...decided to "distort" and "misinterpret" my question and get all sort
>> of
>> "protective" of Jim Eshelman !
>> ...quite sweet really, though not very useful !
>>
>> "MAP" <mikepawlak2...@OVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23xX0AIjIIHA.3356@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>
>> > RJK wrote:
>> >> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
>> >> hours ago,
>> >> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
>> >> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
>> >> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
>> >> adding something "not nice" to it !
>> >> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>>
>> >> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>> >> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
>> >> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>>
>> >> views please ?
>>
>> >> regards, Richard
>>
>> > Version 1.99 also has a false positive
>> > eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>>
>> > I would'nt worry about it.
>
 
B

BoaterDave

Hi Richard - *please* go back ............. and read my most recent post(s).

PM me from there if you wish.

Dave

************************************************
"RJK" <notatospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OB4qeEmIIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> No,
>
> Obviously Bill Castner either cannot see straight, or chose to distort my
> posts right from the start, with a hostile attitude from getgo. Quite why
> eludes me.
>
> I collected Hijackthis.exe v2.02 from aumha.org v2.0.2 (file version
> 2.0.0.2), and just for something to do really, submitted it to the CLS's
> at VirusTotal.com, where three of them, didn't like it. This remains
> fact. I then submitted an older version of HJT from my PC where only one
> CLS's didn't like it. That also remains fact. All of that was accurately
> conveyed in my posts, albeit a little jumbled up.
> He obviously didn't want to make any constructive comment on that, (which
> I thought would have been an interesting topic), but, immediately launched
> into a torrent of vitriol ...something like. "...you've publicly accused
> aumha of distributing infected software..."
>
> It appears that he was simply unable read something as it was literally
> and honestly intended whilst at the same time making wildly fictitious,
> and almost abusive assumptions.
>
> I deleted what I could from my posts, and will not go there again, it's
> simply not worth wasting breath in there, or on him !
>
> regards, Richard
>
>
> "Robear Dyer" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1194563107.653373.63110@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>> Richard, the thread in question is here:
>> http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=29981
>>
>> However, you'd now edited all of your posts to the thread in an
>> apparent effort to cover your mistakes. I'm glad to know that you
>> cannot do so here.
>>
>> According to MVP & AumHa VSOP Bill Castner (who was actively
>> monitoring the thread), in one of your now-edited posts you admitted
>> that you'd submitted (1) an earlier version of HijackThis (e.g.,
>> v1.99.1) to VirusTotal and that (2) you had NOT downloaded it from
>> AumHa Downloads.
>>
>> As another AumHa VSOP and an AumHa Forums Admin, I demand a public
>> apology from you, both here and in the forum thread, for besmirching
>> the reputation of MVP Jim Eshelman and his AumHa website/forums.
>> --
>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security & Shell/User) since 2002
>> AumHa VSOP and Admin
>>
>> On Nov 8, 1:14 pm, "RJK" <notatos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...that was my thought as well but, thought it my observation might
>>> generate
>>> some usefeul observations !
>>> ...in http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30"Hijackthis Logs" discussion
>>> forum, Bill Castner
>>> ...decided to "distort" and "misinterpret" my question and get all sort
>>> of
>>> "protective" of Jim Eshelman !
>>> ...quite sweet really, though not very useful !
>>>
>>> "MAP" <mikepawlak2...@OVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:%23xX0AIjIIHA.3356@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>> > RJK wrote:
>>> >> hijackthis.exe file version 2.0.0.2 collected from aumha.org a few
>>> >> hours ago,
>>> >> submitted it to Virustotal :) ...call me suspicious ?
>>> >> ...I wouldn't dare cast aspersions on Jim Eshelman !
>>> >> ...it crossed my mind that Trend (who bought "hijackthis"could be
>>> >> adding something "not nice" to it !
>>> >> ...3 false positives maybe :-
>>>
>>> >> eSafe7.0.15.02007.10.28 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>>> >> Panda9.0.0.42007.11.06 Suspicious file
>>> >> Webwasher-Gateway6.0.12007.11.08Win32.ModifiedUPX.gen!90 (suspicious)
>>>
>>> >> views please ?
>>>
>>> >> regards, Richard
>>>
>>> > Version 1.99 also has a false positive
>>> > eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.11.08 suspicious Trojan/Worm
>>>
>>> > I would'nt worry about it.
>>
>
>
>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom