Spybot S&D updates, again??

[Heirloom]

I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though
other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,
check out the updates!
Heirloom, old and still need that nap

 

[Gary S. Terhune]

I've recently had a couple of posts to this group disappear. Server issue.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:%23KZ$WpavHHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though
>other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,
>check out the updates!
> Heirloom, old and still need that nap
>

 

[Mike M]

H,

Your earlier message posted 3 July 18:51 GMT is all present and correct
and buried in the pre-existing thread with the same subject "Spybot S&D
updates" which you started on 25 April 17:04 GMT.
--
Mike
PS e-mail to follow when I find the energy.


Heirloom <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote:

> I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even
> though other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if
> it doesn't, check out the updates!
> Heirloom, old and still need that
> nap

 

[Mart]

Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't bother
commenting <g>

Mart


"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
news:uQ$ApAbvHHA.4012@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> H,
>
> Your earlier message posted 3 July 18:51 GMT is all present and correct
> and buried in the pre-existing thread with the same subject "Spybot S&D
> updates" which you started on 25 April 17:04 GMT.
> --
> Mike
> PS e-mail to follow when I find the energy.
>
>
> Heirloom <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote:
>
>> I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even
>> though other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if
>> it doesn't, check out the updates!
>> Heirloom, old and still need that
>> nap
>

 

[Mike M]

Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't
> bother commenting <g>

<G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear
messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that slip
in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not alone if
both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.
--
Mike

 

[Heirloom]

That's just too weird.............how on earth did you find it there??
Mine showed up in red because I was watching it. Yeah, I need to do some
house cleaning, too!
Heirloom, old and so are my
posts

"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
news:%23oCslSbvHHA.4784@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:
>
>> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't
>> bother commenting <g>
>
> <G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear
> messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that slip
> in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not alone if
> both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.
> --
> Mike
>
>

 

[Mart]

Mine seem to 'default' to about 3 months when they seem to clear themselves
after about that time. No problem with WinMe groups for the reason Mike
alluded. Don't know if there's a setting to override the 3 months other than
a manual deletion.

Mart


"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:Op5HHqcvHHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> That's just too weird.............how on earth did you find it there??
> Mine showed up in red because I was watching it. Yeah, I need to do some
> house cleaning, too!
> Heirloom, old and so are my
> posts
>
> "Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
> news:%23oCslSbvHHA.4784@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:
>>
>>> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't
>>> bother commenting <g>
>>
>> <G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear
>> messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that
>> slip in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not
>> alone if both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.
>> --
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>

 

[Mike M]

Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

> Mine seem to 'default' to about 3 months when they seem to clear
> themselves after about that time. No problem with WinMe groups for
> the reason Mike alluded. Don't know if there's a setting to override
> the 3 months other than a manual deletion.

Messages currently expire from the MS news server after 3 months. I used
to manually run every week a message rule I had created that deleted all
posts older than seven days on this particular account. I use multiple
accounts in OE even for the same server, for example I have an MS Win Me
account, MS XP account and a couple of others all on msnews.microsoft.com
and manually run my various rules as and when I remember.
--
Mike

 

[webster72n]

Can't say that I did, Gary.
Must be an individual issue.

Harry.


"Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
news:u9LmvtavHHA.4612@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> I've recently had a couple of posts to this group disappear. Server issue.
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS-MVP Shell/User
> www.grystmill.com
>
> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> news:%23KZ$WpavHHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> >I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though
> >other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,
> >check out the updates!
> > Heirloom, old and still need that nap
> >
>
>