I'm wondering why logging in robocopy (or any copy tasks) matters.

1

1614

I've been replied that to enhance reliability of robocopy task, better logging recommended.1.But, Robocopy does report results of all the copy task after task finished, under all tasks, even I didn't put additional logging feature (like, failed 0 0 0 / skipped 0 0 0 ... etc.)Is that report unreliable? I'm wondering even robocopy reports result, why people prefer additional logging.2.If I found nothing wrong on the result report I mentioned before (no failure or skipped, etc), Is the task results report unreliable as well? Is additional logging required? Or not?If you wanna say it suppose to be

Continue reading...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom