Re: [News] A Couple of Months Remain to Eliminate OOXML's ISO for Corruption

[Moshe Goldfarb]

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:57:08 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:


> Furthermore, a similar investigation should be made into the British
> Library's position, as well as the BBC. These are publicly funded
> bodies, and should not be promoting the proprietary technologies of
> foreign companies.

Yet you foist proprietary technologies during your day job Mark Kent.

Why are you such a hypocrite?

"At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our services,
allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."

Mark Kent
Head of Technology Strategy

http://www.jnetx.com/index.php?id=products

https://solutionfinder.microsoft.co...x?solutionid=9bf1884cf9354bbeb110ba73b82dbdb4

http://download.microsoft.com/downl...fe9-be7b-275fb83964d4/Jnetx_Sandbox_Demo.pptx


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[White Spirit]

Re: [News] A Couple of Months Remain to Eliminate OOXML's ISO forCorruption

Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:57:08 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:

>> Furthermore, a similar investigation should be made into the British
>> Library's position, as well as the BBC. These are publicly funded
>> bodies, and should not be promoting the proprietary technologies of
>> foreign companies.

> Yet you foist proprietary technologies during your day job Mark Kent.

> Why are you such a hypocrite?

Why are you such a spamming cunt?

> "At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
> customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our services,
> allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."

British Telecom isn't a publicly funded body. Taxpayers money isn't
being spent providing technologies that some users are forced to pay for
but unable to use.

 

[Mark Kent]

White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> espoused:
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:57:08 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>>> Furthermore, a similar investigation should be made into the British
>>> Library's position, as well as the BBC. These are publicly funded
>>> bodies, and should not be promoting the proprietary technologies of
>>> foreign companies.
>
>> Yet you foist proprietary technologies during your day job Mark Kent.
>
>> Why are you such a hypocrite?
>
> Why are you such a spamming cunt?
>
>> "At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
>> customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our services,
>> allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."
>
> British Telecom isn't a publicly funded body. Taxpayers money isn't
> being spent providing technologies that some users are forced to pay for
> but unable to use.

Ah, don't worry about Gary Stewart, he's just trying to get attention.
Nobody takes him seriously. As per my .sig, just keep using those open
platforms!

--
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |

 

[Moshe Goldfarb]

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:35:03 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:

> White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> espoused:
>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:57:08 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>
>>>> Furthermore, a similar investigation should be made into the British
>>>> Library's position, as well as the BBC. These are publicly funded
>>>> bodies, and should not be promoting the proprietary technologies of
>>>> foreign companies.
>>
>>> Yet you foist proprietary technologies during your day job Mark Kent.
>>
>>> Why are you such a hypocrite?
>>
>> Why are you such a spamming cunt?
>>
>>> "At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
>>> customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our services,
>>> allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."
>>
>> British Telecom isn't a publicly funded body. Taxpayers money isn't
>> being spent providing technologies that some users are forced to pay for
>> but unable to use.
>
> Ah, don't worry about Gary Stewart, he's just trying to get attention.
> Nobody takes him seriously. As per my .sig, just keep using those open
> platforms!

What a total hypocrite you are Mark Kent.
Your signature says one thing and your day job says a completely different
thing.

Like many COLA Linux nuts, you earn your living using proprietary work but
yet you expect others to give their work away.

What a phony you are Mark Kent.

Here is your sig and below is what you say and do in your day job:


"mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
|| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |""



"At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our services,
allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."

Mark Kent
Head of Technology Strategy

http://www.jnetx.com/index.php?id=products

https://solutionfinder.microsoft.co...x?solutionid=9bf1884cf9354bbeb110ba73b82dbdb4

http://download.microsoft.com/downl...fe9-be7b-275fb83964d4/Jnetx_Sandbox_Demo.pptx




--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[CBFalconer]

Re: [News] A Couple of Months Remain to Eliminate OOXML's ISOforCorruption

White Spirit wrote:
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
.... snip ...
>
>> Yet you foist proprietary technologies during your day job Mark Kent.
>
>> Why are you such a hypocrite?
>
> Why are you such a spamming cunt?

Please don't feed the trolls.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[chrisv]

Re: [News] A Couple of Months Remain to Eliminate OOXML's ISO forCorruption

>White Spirit wrote:
>>
>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> Why are you such a hypocrite?
>>
>> Why are you such a spamming cunt?

He's mentally ill, clearly.