M
Moshe Goldfarb
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:25:44 -0400, DFS wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, Linux will continue to be the choice OS to install on
>> lighter hardware, knowing that it will perform well as expected
>> and stable.
>
> heh!
HPT is delirious again.
>
>> Best test is to try the software.
>
> Absolutely. I recommend every Windows user give Linux a try.
You know what they say:
"If you think you hate Linux now, wait until you actually use it!"
>
>> It helps overcome the troll
>> nonsense being posted in this newsgroup, which is BASICALLY OUT
>> TO DESTROY LINUX REPUTATION in a sad jihad of evangelism tainted
>> with half truths and in some cases, out right lies.
>
> Why would that bother you? You lusers have been lying about MS and Windows
> since the first day
> cola came online.
>
> For instance, just yesterday cola luser AZNomad said Vista requires more
> memory than a 32-bit CPU can address. Not that any cola "advocates" have
> the integrity to challenge him.
>
> and out right = outright.
Linux destorys itself.
People download it.
People try it.
People dump it.
That's why the download numbers never come close to the usage numbers
reported by organizations like the BBC.
>
>
>> One falsehood is that Linux advocates hate Windows. This is not
>> true we use it where needed.
>
> To make a living, while you only tinker and play with the hobby OS.
Exactly!
>
>
>> Having knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of
>> Windows gives us a benchmark for comparing Linux.
>
> Let's hear you talk about Windows strengths. For once.
I'd be happy to hear them talk about Linux's strengths rather than
Microsoft's weaknesses for a change.
>
>> After comparing the 2, I have a definite preference for Linux. I
>> prefer the stability it brings,
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=587905&highlight=freeze
>
> Guess what? Freezes, loses your data, and requires reboots != stable
Everything is relative in the Linux world.
If the system boots it's stable.
If the system puts video on the screen the drivers are great.
If the system manages to play sound (rare BTW) the system is ready for
professional recording studio work.
etc....
>
>> the empowerment to save money,
>
> It's free because it has to be.
They can't even give it away and get people to stick with it.
How they hell could they ever charge money for it?
>
>> keep lighter and cheaper hardware fully operational, newer faster
>> hardware operating at peak efficiency for applications.
>
> English not your native tongue, eh?
>
>
>
>> It also helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by running
>> lighter on hardware.
>
> "90% of the time I boot into Ubuntu Gutsy on my Thinkpad T61p. However
> during traveling, I always boot into Windows XP instead of Ubuntu because XP
> gives me one additional hour of battery life than Ubuntu. I heard that the
> 2.6.22 kernel has some feature to reduce the CPU power consumption by reduce
> the number of CPU wakeups, but I have never noticed the difference. When
> considering battery life, XP eats Linux for breakfast."
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5807#post15018
And this is the number one Linux distribution on distrowatch.
Makes you wonder how well the other 999 versions of Linux work...
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, Linux will continue to be the choice OS to install on
>> lighter hardware, knowing that it will perform well as expected
>> and stable.
>
> heh!
HPT is delirious again.
>
>> Best test is to try the software.
>
> Absolutely. I recommend every Windows user give Linux a try.
You know what they say:
"If you think you hate Linux now, wait until you actually use it!"
>
>> It helps overcome the troll
>> nonsense being posted in this newsgroup, which is BASICALLY OUT
>> TO DESTROY LINUX REPUTATION in a sad jihad of evangelism tainted
>> with half truths and in some cases, out right lies.
>
> Why would that bother you? You lusers have been lying about MS and Windows
> since the first day
> cola came online.
>
> For instance, just yesterday cola luser AZNomad said Vista requires more
> memory than a 32-bit CPU can address. Not that any cola "advocates" have
> the integrity to challenge him.
>
> and out right = outright.
Linux destorys itself.
People download it.
People try it.
People dump it.
That's why the download numbers never come close to the usage numbers
reported by organizations like the BBC.
>
>
>> One falsehood is that Linux advocates hate Windows. This is not
>> true we use it where needed.
>
> To make a living, while you only tinker and play with the hobby OS.
Exactly!
>
>
>> Having knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of
>> Windows gives us a benchmark for comparing Linux.
>
> Let's hear you talk about Windows strengths. For once.
I'd be happy to hear them talk about Linux's strengths rather than
Microsoft's weaknesses for a change.
>
>> After comparing the 2, I have a definite preference for Linux. I
>> prefer the stability it brings,
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=587905&highlight=freeze
>
> Guess what? Freezes, loses your data, and requires reboots != stable
Everything is relative in the Linux world.
If the system boots it's stable.
If the system puts video on the screen the drivers are great.
If the system manages to play sound (rare BTW) the system is ready for
professional recording studio work.
etc....
>
>> the empowerment to save money,
>
> It's free because it has to be.
They can't even give it away and get people to stick with it.
How they hell could they ever charge money for it?
>
>> keep lighter and cheaper hardware fully operational, newer faster
>> hardware operating at peak efficiency for applications.
>
> English not your native tongue, eh?
>
>
>
>> It also helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by running
>> lighter on hardware.
>
> "90% of the time I boot into Ubuntu Gutsy on my Thinkpad T61p. However
> during traveling, I always boot into Windows XP instead of Ubuntu because XP
> gives me one additional hour of battery life than Ubuntu. I heard that the
> 2.6.22 kernel has some feature to reduce the CPU power consumption by reduce
> the number of CPU wakeups, but I have never noticed the difference. When
> considering battery life, XP eats Linux for breakfast."
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5807#post15018
And this is the number one Linux distribution on distrowatch.
Makes you wonder how well the other 999 versions of Linux work...
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/