A
AndyHancock
A few newly installed applications required a modification of firewall
rules, which prompted me to clean up the convolution of rules that
I've amassed over the years. Afterward, I started to get regular
outbound UDP connections from "SYSTEM" to 192.168.1.255, ports
137-138. Much web searching ensued. It could be bad (http://
www.linklogger.com/UDP137.htm) or just IP/name resolutions (http://
www.iss.net/security_center/advice/Exploits/Ports/137/default.htm and
others).
This is a very simple home network, consisting of a DSL modem/router,
and zero to two laptops connected via LAN cable to WiFi (either
Windows 2000 or WindowsXP). One page visited was
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kben-us832017. It
looks like it was meant for non-home IT folk, possibly with a degree
in the area.
For the schmoe home user, what is the advisability of allowing such
accesses to addresses within the home network? A bit of rummaging
turns up RFC 1918, which says what such address ranges are. In my
case, it seems to be the 16-bit block at 192.168.xxx.yyy. Laptops on
this "network" are likely to be installed with standard security
applications (firewall, AV, Spybot Search&Destroy).
Aside for the advisability of the access rule, why would such accesses
be attempted to 192.168.1.255? There is nothing there.
rules, which prompted me to clean up the convolution of rules that
I've amassed over the years. Afterward, I started to get regular
outbound UDP connections from "SYSTEM" to 192.168.1.255, ports
137-138. Much web searching ensued. It could be bad (http://
www.linklogger.com/UDP137.htm) or just IP/name resolutions (http://
www.iss.net/security_center/advice/Exploits/Ports/137/default.htm and
others).
This is a very simple home network, consisting of a DSL modem/router,
and zero to two laptops connected via LAN cable to WiFi (either
Windows 2000 or WindowsXP). One page visited was
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kben-us832017. It
looks like it was meant for non-home IT folk, possibly with a degree
in the area.
For the schmoe home user, what is the advisability of allowing such
accesses to addresses within the home network? A bit of rummaging
turns up RFC 1918, which says what such address ranges are. In my
case, it seems to be the 16-bit block at 192.168.xxx.yyy. Laptops on
this "network" are likely to be installed with standard security
applications (firewall, AV, Spybot Search&Destroy).
Aside for the advisability of the access rule, why would such accesses
be attempted to 192.168.1.255? There is nothing there.