Firefox 2 supported in 98 and Firefox 3 not supported in 98

[Dan]

There is confusion out there even by Chris Quirke which I aim to correct.
Mozilla Firefox 2 is still supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 3 is not
supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 2.x is scheduled for end of life at
the end of the year as is paid AVG 7.5 version for Windows 98. I hope that
clears the confusion in the hazy and smokey air and the blue azure sky and
white fluffy clouds are clearly visible again from within Dreamland.

 

[gibson]

m/be tis oth3r way 'round,,, ie, mozilla isnt doing the 'supporting'. ? too??
btw d.a.n..... you really are an f/wit. plz, go fight in wars with your brother, cept, dont
c0me back.!

justa cheery thought.

(ps, hee hee, .. i''' m sure quirke and gst and others love hearing you quoting or naming
them.. NOT.!)(i sure as hell wouldnt want to be associated with you.)

"Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6008ABDF-9B9E-4CFD-871B-367E83D087BB@microsoft.com...
> There is confusion out there even by Chris Quirke which I aim to correct.
> Mozilla Firefox 2 is still supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 3 is not
> supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 2.x is scheduled for end of life at
> the end of the year as is paid AVG 7.5 version for Windows 98. I hope that
> clears the confusion in the hazy and smokey air and the blue azure sky and
> white fluffy clouds are clearly visible again from within Dreamland.

 

[Dan]

Do you think I give a flying f__k?

"gibson" wrote:

> m/be tis oth3r way 'round,,, ie, mozilla isnt doing the 'supporting'. ? too??
> btw d.a.n..... you really are an f/wit. plz, go fight in wars with your brother, cept, dont
> c0me back.!
>
> justa cheery thought.
>
> (ps, hee hee, .. i''' m sure quirke and gst and others love hearing you quoting or naming
> them.. NOT.!)(i sure as hell wouldnt want to be associated with you.)
>
> "Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6008ABDF-9B9E-4CFD-871B-367E83D087BB@microsoft.com...
> > There is confusion out there even by Chris Quirke which I aim to correct.
> > Mozilla Firefox 2 is still supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 3 is not
> > supported by Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 2.x is scheduled for end of life at
> > the end of the year as is paid AVG 7.5 version for Windows 98. I hope that
> > clears the confusion in the hazy and smokey air and the blue azure sky and
> > white fluffy clouds are clearly visible again from within Dreamland.
>
>
>

 

[thanatoid]

"gibson" <guitar@fretwork.com> wrote in
news:#F8#B#EBJHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:

> m/be tis oth3r way 'round,,, ie, mozilla isnt doing the
> 'supporting'. ? too?? btw d.a.n..... you really are an
> f/wit. plz, go fight in wars with your brother, cept,
> dont c0me back.!
>
> justa cheery thought.
>
> (ps, hee hee, .. i''' m sure quirke and gst and
> others love hearing you quoting or naming them..
> NOT.!)(i sure as hell wouldnt want to be associated with
> you.)
>
> "Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6008ABDF-9B9E-4CFD-871B-367E83D087BB@microsoft.com...
>> There is confusion out there even by Chris Quirke which I
>> aim to correct. Mozilla Firefox 2 is still supported by
>> Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 3 is not supported by Windows
>> 98. Mozilla Firefox 2.x is scheduled for end of life at
>> the end of the year as is paid AVG 7.5 version for Windows
>> 98. I hope that clears the confusion in the hazy and
>> smokey air and the blue azure sky and white fluffy clouds
>> are clearly visible again from within Dreamland.

Firefox is the most overrated program around. IMO it sucks.
Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no java,
scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.

ESET NOD32 is the best AV program around. It was under $20 at
www.purplus.com a little while ago, may still be.


--
[from a recent conversation]
thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband?
Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster.

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On 22 Aug 2008 13:16:33 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid> put
finger to keyboard and composed:

>Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no java,
>scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.

Opera 9.5x has some serious resource issues. I recommend sticking with
9.27 until the bugs are fixed. OffByOne, OTOH, is great, especially
for viewing ad-infested web sites. To this end I have added "open page
in OffByOne" and "open link in OffByOne" options to Opera's r-click
menus, as well as IE and Firefox options.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

 

[thanatoid]

Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in
news:8mkua4tnluusa7bn2mtpmihs5n66i299ra@4ax.com:

> On 22 Aug 2008 13:16:33 GMT, thanatoid
> <waiting@the.exit.invalid> put finger to keyboard and
> composed:
>
>>Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no
>>java, scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.
>
> Opera 9.5x has some serious resource issues. I recommend
> sticking with 9.27 until the bugs are fixed. OffByOne,
> OTOH, is great, especially for viewing ad-infested web
> sites. To this end I have added "open page in OffByOne" and
> "open link in OffByOne" options to Opera's r-click menus,
> as well as IE and Firefox options.
>
> - Franc Zabkar

Out of curiosity, I tried Opera 7.54 after years of using 7.23.
It was SO much of a resource hog (this is a 95B 166MHz/96 RAM in
case you forget) and it had so many different features I was
surprised they didn't call it ver 8.x.

After 3 days I went back to 7.23.

I have NO idea what any of the other version - prior or later
are like.

I use OB1 all the time except when I am forced to go to some
stupid java-loaded site, like my bank.

--
[from a recent conversation]
thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband?
Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster.

 

[Dan]

Opera is junk, imo, because it has no 256 bit AES encryption and I don't care
for its interface. In addition, it lacks the amount of good ad ons that
Mozilla Firefox has and I also don't care for Apple's Safarii because it also
lacks 256 bit AES encryption and has too many security vulnerabilities like
Apple's Quicktime associated with it in Microsoft Windows.

"thanatoid" wrote:

> "gibson" <guitar@fretwork.com> wrote in
> news:#F8#B#EBJHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
> > m/be tis oth3r way 'round,,, ie, mozilla isnt doing the
> > 'supporting'. ? too?? btw d.a.n..... you really are an
> > f/wit. plz, go fight in wars with your brother, cept,
> > dont c0me back.!
> >
> > justa cheery thought.
> >
> > (ps, hee hee, .. i''' m sure quirke and gst and
> > others love hearing you quoting or naming them..
> > NOT.!)(i sure as hell wouldnt want to be associated with
> > you.)
> >
> > "Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:6008ABDF-9B9E-4CFD-871B-367E83D087BB@microsoft.com...
> >> There is confusion out there even by Chris Quirke which I
> >> aim to correct. Mozilla Firefox 2 is still supported by
> >> Windows 98. Mozilla Firefox 3 is not supported by Windows
> >> 98. Mozilla Firefox 2.x is scheduled for end of life at
> >> the end of the year as is paid AVG 7.5 version for Windows
> >> 98. I hope that clears the confusion in the hazy and
> >> smokey air and the blue azure sky and white fluffy clouds
> >> are clearly visible again from within Dreamland.
>
> Firefox is the most overrated program around. IMO it sucks.
> Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no java,
> scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.
>
> ESET NOD32 is the best AV program around. It was under $20 at
> www.purplus.com a little while ago, may still be.
>
>
> --
> [from a recent conversation]
> thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband?
> Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster.
>

 

[Dan]

Exactly and even in Mozilla Firefox version 2.0.0.16 is better than Firefox
3.x until Mozilla can work out the bugs in it and get it to work well with
their add-ons. However, Mozilla Firefox 3 does have better safety and
security if that is your only goal but does not work with Windows 98 or 98
Second Edition.

"Franc Zabkar" wrote:

> On 22 Aug 2008 13:16:33 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid> put
> finger to keyboard and composed:
>
> >Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no java,
> >scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.
>
> Opera 9.5x has some serious resource issues. I recommend sticking with
> 9.27 until the bugs are fixed. OffByOne, OTOH, is great, especially
> for viewing ad-infested web sites. To this end I have added "open page
> in OffByOne" and "open link in OffByOne" options to Opera's r-click
> menus, as well as IE and Firefox options.
>
> - Franc Zabkar
> --
> Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
>

 

[Dan]

I also don't like when web sites like certain banking sites and also school
sites want Java because you always have to update it so frequently because of
security issues and then remove the old version because Sun Java does not
want to do that for you automatically because I am sure they want as much of
their software taking up space on your computer as possible or it is just
because of a lack of interest on Sun's part. Just a guess on my part as to
why Sun Java does not automatically remove their older versions.

"thanatoid" wrote:

> Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in
> news:8mkua4tnluusa7bn2mtpmihs5n66i299ra@4ax.com:
>
> > On 22 Aug 2008 13:16:33 GMT, thanatoid
> > <waiting@the.exit.invalid> put finger to keyboard and
> > composed:
> >
> >>Opera rules, or for /REALLY/ fast 100% safe browsing (no
> >>java, scripts, flash, etc. recognized/processed), OffByOne.
> >
> > Opera 9.5x has some serious resource issues. I recommend
> > sticking with 9.27 until the bugs are fixed. OffByOne,
> > OTOH, is great, especially for viewing ad-infested web
> > sites. To this end I have added "open page in OffByOne" and
> > "open link in OffByOne" options to Opera's r-click menus,
> > as well as IE and Firefox options.
> >
> > - Franc Zabkar
>
> Out of curiosity, I tried Opera 7.54 after years of using 7.23.
> It was SO much of a resource hog (this is a 95B 166MHz/96 RAM in
> case you forget) and it had so many different features I was
> surprised they didn't call it ver 8.x.
>
> After 3 days I went back to 7.23.
>
> I have NO idea what any of the other version - prior or later
> are like.
>
> I use OB1 all the time except when I am forced to go to some
> stupid java-loaded site, like my bank.
>
> --
> [from a recent conversation]
> thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband?
> Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster.
>