CPU Upgrade?

W

webster72n

What is the better option:
1. to upgrade the current processor or
2. to install a co-processor (motherboard capable)?
The model installed is an AMD Duron M3 (Spitfire).
It has nothing to do with WinME, but to keep this NG alive.

Harry.
 
H

Heirloom

Harry, that can't be answered with the information given. The processor is
not your only limiting factor. You can upgrade to the fastest processor
available and not be any better off than you are now, depending on the other
items that could limit processing, i.e. bus speed, memory/speed, HD speed
and configuration, mobo limitations and on and on.
For what you would be spending on a processor upgrade (which may or may not
help significantly), you should consider one of the inexpensive systems
available today...just make sure it is configurable to your liking in the
future. JMO, I could be wrong........
Heirloom, old and putting tinsel on a turd don't
make it an ornament

"webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u5yWKDU3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> What is the better option:
> 1. to upgrade the current processor or
> 2. to install a co-processor (motherboard capable)?
> The model installed is an AMD Duron M3 (Spitfire).
> It has nothing to do with WinME, but to keep this NG alive.
>
> Harry.
>
>
 
J

Joan Archer

ROFL
Joan

Heirloom wrote:
Heirloom, old and putting
> tinsel on a turd don't make it an ornament
>
 
W

webster72n

Heirloom:
According to your response I may be best off to leave things the way they
are.
You didn't address the co-processor option directly, but I assume it fits
within the framework of your assessment.
The reason I came up with this proposal was 'SiSoft Sandra', which suggested
that an upgrade would be in order.
This machine works too good to be replaced by another, at least for now.
Thanks for 'giving me an echo'.

Harry.


"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:uPwvPme3HHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Harry, that can't be answered with the information given. The processor

is
> not your only limiting factor. You can upgrade to the fastest processor
> available and not be any better off than you are now, depending on the

other
> items that could limit processing, i.e. bus speed, memory/speed, HD speed
> and configuration, mobo limitations and on and on.
> For what you would be spending on a processor upgrade (which may or may

not
> help significantly), you should consider one of the inexpensive systems
> available today...just make sure it is configurable to your liking in the
> future. JMO, I could be wrong........
> Heirloom, old and putting tinsel on a turd

don't
> make it an ornament
>
> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u5yWKDU3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> > What is the better option:
> > 1. to upgrade the current processor or
> > 2. to install a co-processor (motherboard capable)?
> > The model installed is an AMD Duron M3 (Spitfire).
> > It has nothing to do with WinME, but to keep this NG alive.
> >
> > Harry.
> >
> >

>
>
 
H

Heirloom

Hey Harry,
Putting a math co-processor in, once again, would probably not make
a significant difference in your everyday use of the machine. Yeah, it
would help with the 'number crunching' and maybe provide a mild speed boost
to some graphics intensive apps, but, most likely not enough that you would
notice. I could be wrong (of course), but, I think you would be looking at
milliseconds for a payoff.......you would need Sandra to see the difference.

If it is working good and fulfills your needs, leave it alone.
SiSoft Sandra is a great program, however, I have seen some of the
'suggested improvements' on mine that were semi-unrealistic, at best.
Heirloom, old and keepin' mine

"webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eFNYfNg3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> Heirloom:
> According to your response I may be best off to leave things the way they
> are.
> You didn't address the co-processor option directly, but I assume it fits
> within the framework of your assessment.
> The reason I came up with this proposal was 'SiSoft Sandra', which
> suggested
> that an upgrade would be in order.
> This machine works too good to be replaced by another, at least for now.
> Thanks for 'giving me an echo'.
>
> Harry.
>
>
> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> news:uPwvPme3HHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Harry, that can't be answered with the information given. The processor

> is
>> not your only limiting factor. You can upgrade to the fastest processor
>> available and not be any better off than you are now, depending on the

> other
>> items that could limit processing, i.e. bus speed, memory/speed, HD speed
>> and configuration, mobo limitations and on and on.
>> For what you would be spending on a processor upgrade (which may or may

> not
>> help significantly), you should consider one of the inexpensive systems
>> available today...just make sure it is configurable to your liking in the
>> future. JMO, I could be wrong........
>> Heirloom, old and putting tinsel on a turd

> don't
>> make it an ornament
>>
>> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:u5yWKDU3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> > What is the better option:
>> > 1. to upgrade the current processor or
>> > 2. to install a co-processor (motherboard capable)?
>> > The model installed is an AMD Duron M3 (Spitfire).
>> > It has nothing to do with WinME, but to keep this NG alive.
>> >
>> > Harry.
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
W

webster72n

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:%23wt4%23hq3HHA.5164@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hey Harry,
> Putting a math co-processor in, once again, would probably not

make
> a significant difference in your everyday use of the machine. Yeah, it
> would help with the 'number crunching' and maybe provide a mild speed

boost
> to some graphics intensive apps, but, most likely not enough that you

would
> notice. I could be wrong (of course), but, I think you would be looking

at
> milliseconds for a payoff.......you would need Sandra to see the

difference.
>
> If it is working good and fulfills your needs, leave it alone.
> SiSoft Sandra is a great program, however, I have seen some of the
> 'suggested improvements' on mine that were semi-unrealistic, at best.
> Heirloom, old and keepin' mine


And so will I, H, thank you.

Harry.


>
> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eFNYfNg3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >
> > Heirloom:
> > According to your response I may be best off to leave things the way

they
> > are.
> > You didn't address the co-processor option directly, but I assume it

fits
> > within the framework of your assessment.
> > The reason I came up with this proposal was 'SiSoft Sandra', which
> > suggested
> > that an upgrade would be in order.
> > This machine works too good to be replaced by another, at least for now.
> > Thanks for 'giving me an echo'.
> >
> > Harry.
> >
> >
> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> > news:uPwvPme3HHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >> Harry, that can't be answered with the information given. The

processor
> > is
> >> not your only limiting factor. You can upgrade to the fastest

processor
> >> available and not be any better off than you are now, depending on the

> > other
> >> items that could limit processing, i.e. bus speed, memory/speed, HD

speed
> >> and configuration, mobo limitations and on and on.
> >> For what you would be spending on a processor upgrade (which may or may

> > not
> >> help significantly), you should consider one of the inexpensive systems
> >> available today...just make sure it is configurable to your liking in

the
> >> future. JMO, I could be wrong........
> >> Heirloom, old and putting tinsel on a turd

> > don't
> >> make it an ornament
> >>
> >> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:u5yWKDU3HHA.5852@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >> > What is the better option:
> >> > 1. to upgrade the current processor or
> >> > 2. to install a co-processor (motherboard capable)?
> >> > The model installed is an AMD Duron M3 (Spitfire).
> >> > It has nothing to do with WinME, but to keep this NG alive.
> >> >
> >> > Harry.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>
 
Back
Top Bottom