Guest Frank Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote: > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote: > >> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote: >>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your >>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years >>>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, >>>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, >>>>>>>>>>> billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions again. >>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up >>>>>>>>>>> with! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They >>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the >>>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and >>>>>>>> "spin". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got >>>>>> it ray-baby? >>>>> >>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or >>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced >>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie. >>>> >>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here >>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with >>>> will let you connect to the Internet. >>> >>> You've never come up with one example. >> >> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops! > > Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE example > - but you can't - because there isn't one! I just did! Oops! > >> >> Of course I can't connect to the >>> internet - I post here via my electric personality. >>> >>> >>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'. >>>> >>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get >>>> lost ray, you have no business here. >>> >>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! >> >> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post! >> >> The rest of >>> the world knows differently. >> >> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux. > > I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have a > clue in the world what Linux is... That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being available Millions now know about linux. And uhhh...don't you open sores advocates keep saying that millions now use linux? Oops...again!...LOL! - thanks to the lying fud you and billy > baby and your friends pump out. Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR! Oops! > >> >> Glad you like working with an invalid! >> >> Now comes the third lie in one post! >> Oops!...LOL! > Quote
Guest ray Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:22:02 -0700, Frank wrote: > On 4/5/2010 3:14 PM, ray wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >> >>> "ray" wrote in message >>> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your >>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten >>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. >>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in >>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions >>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing >>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They >>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch >>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube >>>>>>>>>> spin? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and >>>>>>>>> "spin". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got >>>>>>> it ray-baby? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or >>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced >>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here >>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love >>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet. >>>> >>>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to >>>> the internet - I post here via my electric personality. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'. >>>>> >>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. >>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here. >>>> >>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest >>>> of the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an >>>> invalid! >>> >>> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece >>> of shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has >>> been free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be >>> on every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it: >>> legally. Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the >>> desktop machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it >>> and people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most. >>> >>> >> What a crock of shit. > > Yes, you are full of shit. > > Most people don't even know what Linux is! > > LIAR! > > Imagine, >> MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and >> they still can't crack 90% > > You dumb fuck...MS "cracked" 90% yrs ago. Oops! Well of course, they 'cracked' it - they hit a high and have been dropping ever since. Most reasonable estimates put them below 90% now. > > - it ought to be at least 99.9. > > You're losing it ray-baby! > > You would think >> that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an >> absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it! > > Uhhh...now you've switched topics from desk tops to servers, huh?. Oops! I haven't switched topics - it was YOU who was talking about desktops. Oops! >> >>> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they >>> SUCK. That's why. Oops. >> >> Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a >> computer? Geez - I don't know. >> > If most all computers that are sold came with an OS then there wouldn't > not be any use for big box stores like Fry's or any of the hundreds of > Internet stores selling hardware/software components. Face it you lying > snake, a lot of people build their own. Oops! Yeah - probably a whopping 1%! Oops! > > Quote
Guest ray Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:27:01 -0700, Frank wrote: > On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote: >> >>> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote: >>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your >>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten >>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. >>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in >>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions >>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing >>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They >>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch >>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube >>>>>>>>>> spin? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and >>>>>>>>> "spin". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got >>>>>>> it ray-baby? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or >>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced >>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here >>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love >>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet. >>>> >>>> You've never come up with one example. >>> >>> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops! >> >> Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE >> example - but you can't - because there isn't one! > > I just did! > Oops! >> >> >>> Of course I can't connect to the >>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'. >>>>> >>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. >>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here. >>>> >>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! >>> >>> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post! >>> >>> The rest of >>>> the world knows differently. >>> >>> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux. >> >> I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have >> a clue in the world what Linux is... > > That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being > available Millions now know about linux. And uhhh...don't you open sores > advocates keep saying that millions now use linux? > Oops...again!...LOL! And most of the ones who DO know about Linux USE IT! Oops! > > - thanks to the lying fud you and billy >> baby and your friends pump out. > > Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR! > Oops! You wish! Oops! All we need is ONE example, frankie - keep trying! >> >> >>> Glad you like working with an invalid! >>> >>> Now comes the third lie in one post! >>> Oops!...LOL! >> Quote
Guest Frank Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 On 4/5/2010 5:21 PM, ray wrote: > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:22:02 -0700, Frank wrote: > >> On 4/5/2010 3:14 PM, ray wrote: >>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>> >>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten >>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in >>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions >>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing >>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They >>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch >>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube >>>>>>>>>>> spin? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and >>>>>>>>>> "spin". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got >>>>>>>> it ray-baby? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or >>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced >>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here >>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love >>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet. >>>>> >>>>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to >>>>> the internet - I post here via my electric personality. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'. >>>>>> >>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. >>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest >>>>> of the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an >>>>> invalid! >>>> >>>> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece >>>> of shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has >>>> been free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be >>>> on every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it: >>>> legally. Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the >>>> desktop machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it >>>> and people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most. >>>> >>>> >>> What a crock of shit. >> >> Yes, you are full of shit. >> >> Most people don't even know what Linux is! >> >> LIAR! >> >> Imagine, >>> MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and >>> they still can't crack 90% >> >> You dumb fuck...MS "cracked" 90% yrs ago. Oops! > > Well of course, they 'cracked' it.. Lie #1...not what you already said. Oops! - they hit a high and have been > dropping ever since. Yet they have more total users. Oops! Most reasonable estimates put them below 90% now. None of them do. > >> >> - it ought to be at least 99.9. >> >> You're losing it ray-baby! >> >> You would think >>> that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an >>> absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it! >> >> Uhhh...now you've switched topics from desk tops to servers, huh?. Oops! > > I haven't switched topics... Lie #2. - it was YOU who was talking about desktops. > Oops! > No shit dipshit, seeing as how this is a Window 7 ng and in case you didn't know, Windows 7 is a desktop OS, the very best desktop OS available today. >>> >>>> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they >>>> SUCK. That's why. Oops. >>> >>> Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a >>> computer? Geez - I don't know. >>> >> If most all computers that are sold came with an OS then there wouldn't >> not be any use for big box stores like Fry's or any of the hundreds of >> Internet stores selling hardware/software components. Face it you lying >> snake, a lot of people build their own. Oops! > > Yeah - probably a whopping 1%! Hummm...so you have verifiable empirical data to backup your 1% guess? Oops! Quote
Guest Frank Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 On 4/5/2010 5:22 PM, ray wrote: > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:27:01 -0700, Frank wrote: > >> On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote: >>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten >>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in >>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions >>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing >>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They >>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch >>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube >>>>>>>>>>> spin? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and >>>>>>>>>> "spin". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got >>>>>>>> it ray-baby? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or >>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced >>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here >>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love >>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet. >>>>> >>>>> You've never come up with one example. >>>> >>>> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops! >>> >>> Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE >>> example - but you can't - because there isn't one! >> >> I just did! >> Oops! >>> >>> >>>> Of course I can't connect to the >>>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'. >>>>>> >>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. >>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! >>>> >>>> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post! >>>> >>>> The rest of >>>>> the world knows differently. >>>> >>>> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux. >>> >>> I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have >>> a clue in the world what Linux is... >> >> That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being >> available Millions now know about linux. And uhhh...don't you open sores >> advocates keep saying that millions now use linux? >> Oops...again!...LOL! > > And most of the ones who DO know about Linux USE IT! Oops! hehehe...can't keep your lies straight huh? Figures..you and alias are known liars. > > >> >> - thanks to the lying fud you and billy >>> baby and your friends pump out. >> >> Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR! >> Oops! > > You wish! Oops! All we need is ONE example, frankie - keep trying! Well, in the last two or three post of yours I caught you lying at least half a dozen times. Big oops!...LOL! > > >>> >>> >>>> Glad you like working with an invalid! >>>> >>>> Now comes the third lie in one post! >>>> Oops!...LOL! >>> > Quote
Guest John Morrison Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:03:43 -0300, Al Smith wrote: >Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote: >> Al Smith wrote: >>> My copy of Windows 7 came with my Dell computer, and unless Dell is up >>> to shenanigans, it is perfectly legal. But I don't trust Microsoft. >>> It's that simple. >> >> If you don't trust Microsoft, you should switch to a different OS. How >> can anyone who doesn't trust Microsoft run Windows?? > >I doubt if everyone running Windows trusts Microsoft. I use it >because it's the most convenient for me -- I've tried Linux and it >always has some problem with hardware that I can't solve. Mind >you, so did Windows 7 x64, so maybe I'm no further ahead with this >version of Windows than I would be with Linux. I feel no respect for Microsoft, Al. I've also tried Linux, I had no problems with hardware but couldn't run my favourite software programs. What were your Windows 7x64 problems? -- John Quote
Guest MJMIII Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 "John Morrison" wrote in message news:00052f7d$0$1516$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:03:43 -0300, Al Smith > wrote: > >>Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote: >>> Al Smith wrote: >>>> My copy of Windows 7 came with my Dell computer, and unless Dell is up >>>> to shenanigans, it is perfectly legal. But I don't trust Microsoft. >>>> It's that simple. >>> >>> If you don't trust Microsoft, you should switch to a different OS. How >>> can anyone who doesn't trust Microsoft run Windows?? >> >>I doubt if everyone running Windows trusts Microsoft. I use it >>because it's the most convenient for me -- I've tried Linux and it >>always has some problem with hardware that I can't solve. Mind >>you, so did Windows 7 x64, so maybe I'm no further ahead with this >>version of Windows than I would be with Linux. > > I feel no respect for Microsoft, Al. > > I've also tried Linux, I had no problems with hardware but couldn't run > my favourite software programs. > > What were your Windows 7x64 problems? Al doesn't actually have Windows 7x64 problems. What he has is tinkering problems. He tinkers, then fucks something up, then blames Microsoft. If you search his name in this group and read his posts you'll see what I mean. -- "Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." Quote
Guest Dave \Crash\ Dummy Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 Al Smith wrote: > Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote: >> Al Smith wrote: >>> My copy of Windows 7 came with my Dell computer, and unless Dell >>> is up to shenanigans, it is perfectly legal. But I don't trust >>> Microsoft. It's that simple. >> If you don't trust Microsoft, you should switch to a different OS. >> How can anyone who doesn't trust Microsoft run Windows?? > I doubt if everyone running Windows trusts Microsoft. I use it > because it's the most convenient for me -- I've tried Linux and it > always has some problem with hardware that I can't solve. Mind you, > so did Windows 7 x64, so maybe I'm no further ahead with this version > of Windows than I would be with Linux. The point is that if Microsoft wanted to own you and exploit all your most secret stuff, MS would just build an untraceable and unblockable connection into the 10+ GB of Windows 7 code. It wouldn't have to sneak it in as an update. The only defense would be a pair of wire cutters applied to your internet connection. If you run Windows and connect to the internet, you are trusting Microsoft, whether you like it, or not. Blocking updates to protect yourself from Microsoft is just silly. -- Crash "When you get to a fork in the road, take it." ~ Yogi Berra ~ Quote
Guest Al Smith Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 John Morrison wrote: > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:03:43 -0300, Al Smith > wrote: > >> Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote: >>> Al Smith wrote: >>>> My copy of Windows 7 came with my Dell computer, and unless Dell is up >>>> to shenanigans, it is perfectly legal. But I don't trust Microsoft. >>>> It's that simple. >>> >>> If you don't trust Microsoft, you should switch to a different OS. How >>> can anyone who doesn't trust Microsoft run Windows?? >> >> I doubt if everyone running Windows trusts Microsoft. I use it >> because it's the most convenient for me -- I've tried Linux and it >> always has some problem with hardware that I can't solve. Mind >> you, so did Windows 7 x64, so maybe I'm no further ahead with this >> version of Windows than I would be with Linux. > > I feel no respect for Microsoft, Al. > > I've also tried Linux, I had no problems with hardware but couldn't run > my favourite software programs. > > What were your Windows 7x64 problems? Epson decided not to write any driver for my scanner for x64 Windows (Vista or 7). Nothing I can do, except run it on my netbook, which has XP. Not really Microsoft's fault, but it is a problem with Windows 7 for a lot of older hardware. The manufacturers just won't write drivers for them. So now I have to hook up my scanner to my netbook to scan anything, and I've vowed never to buy another Epson product (they are shit anyway, so this wasn't a difficult decision to make). -Al- Quote
Guest Alias Posted April 7, 2010 Posted April 7, 2010 Bill Yanaire wrote: > > > "Alias" wrote in message > news:hpd9qs$mp8$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Leythos wrote: >>> In article, >>> aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido says... >>>> >>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "ray" wrote in message >>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the >>>>>>> past >>>>>>> few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a message >>>>>>> popped >>>>>>> up on the screen saying we may be running an invalid copy. This >>>>>>> is pure >>>>>>> BS. Anyone else run into this problem?? Suggestions?? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem. >>>>> >>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth >>>>> constantly. >>>> >>>> LOL! Do you really think *anyone* will believe you, you nymshifting >>>> liar? >>> >>> You were in my kill file, so it appears you've changed your name again, >>> making you look hypocritical at the least. >>> >> >> I haven't changed anything regarding my name. It's still Alias and the >> email is still aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido. I am, however, >> posting from a Windows machine because the power supply for my Ubuntu >> machine went south and I can't get a new one until tomorrow. You're >> the expert -- all we need do is ask you -- would a different machine >> kill my name in your kill file, hot shot? >> >> -- >> Alias > > Translation: Alias is posting from his Windows machine because he > realizes that Ubuntu is a piece of SHIT and Ubuntu also damaged his > power supply. Got a new power supply today and Ubuntu works just fine. Your statement that Ubuntu can break a power supply comes from your contact on Pluto? > > It's too bad you don't have any real work to do because you could do > real work with a Windows box and just waste time with the Ubuntu box. > > I have lots of real, well paying work to do and I'm glad I have my Ubuntu box up and running again. Got any more obvious lies you'd like to share? -- Alias Quote
Guest no_one@no_where.invalid Posted April 7, 2010 Posted April 7, 2010 no_one@no_where.invalid wrote: >Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the past Problem solved. My copy is legal but a MS update can do this. The cure it to undo the update. All is well now. -- Quote
Guest MJMIII Posted April 7, 2010 Posted April 7, 2010 Which update did you uninstall? -- "Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." wrote in message news:fm8pr51q88nsdfqf6jt12qgu1vugdola4o@4ax.com... > no_one@no_where.invalid wrote: > >>Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the past > > Problem solved. My copy is legal but a MS update can do this. The > cure it to undo the update. All is well now. > -- Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.