Well, that's nice

[Alias]

alias is the fool he seems to be!!!

wonderwhy wrote:

> On 5/2/2010 1:08 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 5/2/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> ANONYMOUS wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all

>>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only

>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to support

>>>> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups

>>>> (assuming there are any out there)!

>>>

>>> Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news groups.

>>>

>>>> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit

>>>> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.

>>>>

>>>> hth

>>>

>>> I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of Ubuntu

>>> 32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.

>>

>> You are the fool you seem to be.

>> Oops!!!

> No, you were comparing Ubuntu to XP which is 8 years old. Nice job

> Moron. Try catching up



The same is true for Pig Vista and Windows and the Seven Dwarfs. You're

the moron who is constantly wondering why.



--

Alias

 

[Frank]

alias is sick!

On 5/5/2010 4:17 AM, DanS wrote:

> Alias wrote in

> news:hrplol$9g1$1@news.eternal-september.org:

>

>> DanS wrote:

>>>> So you think that linux users are going to pay for

>>>> PS?...Hahahah!!!

>>>

>>> You're right....for once.....

>>

>> No, he's not. I will pay for it.

>>

>>>

>>> Why would Linux users pay for a program that 99% of

>>> Windows users don't pay for either.

>>

>> You aren't saying that most people who use PhotoShop are

>> using a pirated version, are you?

>

> Most home users, yes.



That is an assumption on your part dan=o.

>

> As I posted, Photoshop is one every list of the most pirated s/w

> titles.



Yet you still can't backup your 99% number, can you.

 

[Frank]

alias is the fool he seems to be!!!

On 5/5/2010 8:11 AM, Alias wrote:

> wonderwhy wrote:

>> On 5/2/2010 1:08 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 5/2/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> ANONYMOUS wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes

>>>>>> all

>>>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only

>>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to support

>>>>> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups

>>>>> (assuming there are any out there)!

>>>>

>>>> Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news groups.

>>>>

>>>>> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit

>>>>> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.

>>>>>

>>>>> hth

>>>>

>>>> I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of Ubuntu

>>>> 32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.

>>>

>>> You are the fool you seem to be.

>>> Oops!!!

>> No, you were comparing Ubuntu to XP which is 8 years old. Nice job

>> Moron. Try catching up

>

> The same is true for Pig Vista and Windows and the Seven Dwarfs. You're

> the moron who is constantly wondering why.

>

You just don't get it and you never will.

 

[wonderwhy]

alias is the fool he seems to be!!!

On 5/5/2010 11:11 AM, Alias wrote:

> wonderwhy wrote:

>> On 5/2/2010 1:08 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 5/2/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> ANONYMOUS wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes

>>>>>> all

>>>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only

>>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to support

>>>>> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups

>>>>> (assuming there are any out there)!

>>>>

>>>> Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news groups.

>>>>

>>>>> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit

>>>>> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.

>>>>>

>>>>> hth

>>>>

>>>> I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of Ubuntu

>>>> 32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.

>>>

>>> You are the fool you seem to be.

>>> Oops!!!

>> No, you were comparing Ubuntu to XP which is 8 years old. Nice job

>> Moron. Try catching up

>

> The same is true for Pig Vista and Windows and the Seven Dwarfs. You're

> the moron who is constantly wondering why.

>

Constantly wondering why you are still breathing

 

[Alias]

alias is the fool he seems to be!!!

On 05/12/2010 04:45 PM, wonderwhy wrote:

> On 5/5/2010 11:11 AM, Alias wrote:

>> wonderwhy wrote:

>>> On 5/2/2010 1:08 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 5/2/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> ANONYMOUS wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes

>>>>>>> all

>>>>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only

>>>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to

>>>>>> support

>>>>>> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups

>>>>>> (assuming there are any out there)!

>>>>>

>>>>> Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news groups.

>>>>>

>>>>>> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit

>>>>>> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> hth

>>>>>

>>>>> I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of Ubuntu

>>>>> 32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.

>>>>

>>>> You are the fool you seem to be.

>>>> Oops!!!

>>> No, you were comparing Ubuntu to XP which is 8 years old. Nice job

>>> Moron. Try catching up

>>

>> The same is true for Pig Vista and Windows and the Seven Dwarfs. You're

>> the moron who is constantly wondering why.

>>

> Constantly wondering why you are still breathing



Good constitution and good genes.



--



Alias

 

[Frank]

alias is the fool he seems to be!!!

On 5/13/2010 2:49 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 05/12/2010 04:45 PM, wonderwhy wrote:

>> On 5/5/2010 11:11 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> wonderwhy wrote:

>>>> On 5/2/2010 1:08 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 5/2/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> ANONYMOUS wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes

>>>>>>>> all

>>>>>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP

>>>>>>>> only

>>>>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to

>>>>>>> support

>>>>>>> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups

>>>>>>> (assuming there are any out there)!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news

>>>>>> groups.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit

>>>>>>> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> hth

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of

>>>>>> Ubuntu

>>>>>> 32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.

>>>>>

>>>>> You are the fool you seem to be.

>>>>> Oops!!!

>>>> No, you were comparing Ubuntu to XP which is 8 years old. Nice job

>>>> Moron. Try catching up

>>>

>>> The same is true for Pig Vista and Windows and the Seven Dwarfs. You're

>>> the moron who is constantly wondering why.

>>>

>> Constantly wondering why you are still breathing

>

> Good constitution and good genes.

>

So how is that Hepatitis C coming along?

Well...?

Oops!