- Thread starter
- #141
N
norm
Frank wrote:
> norm wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> norm wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have no idea what I am, but you still remain a hypocrite.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Well norm, I don't think so.
>>> If you calling me a hypocrite is the best you can come with, and
>>> that's your best shot, sorry, but it is not near good enough.
>>
>> Good enough for what? You?
>
> Not good enough to mean anything to anyone except you. It's only your
> uneducated and unsubstantiated personal opinion. You speak only for
> yourself, right?
"It's only your uneducated and unsubstantiated personal opinion". As
opposed to what from your quarter? You can attempt to walk this around
in circles all you want. What is unsubstantiated? You stated (quite
strongly) that you believe in God. With that belief comes responsibility
for one's words and actions. Your words and actions belie such a belief.
You are a hypocrite by definition. The other possibility is that you do
not believe in God, even though you state that you do. In that case, you
are simply a liar.
>
>>
>>> And only coming up with a cut/paste dictionary definition doesn't
>>> make me one nor does you calling me one make me one cause I'm not a
>>> hypocrite by your's or anyone else's definition.
>>
>> Sure you are.
>
> hahaha...sorry norm, but that's just not true. Your opinion is owned
> only by you and it's totally meaningless especially to me, the person
> you're trying to hang it on.
> Try again
>>
>>> And just because you want it to doesn't mean it does.
>>> Too bad!
>>> Try harder.
>>
>> Don't need to.
>>
> Then you give up and concede that you're wrong, right?
> Otherwise your argument just fell completely apart.
>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> Oh, and one other thing.
>>> You have no idea who I am either!
>>
>> Sure I do. You are a hypocrite, by anyone's definition.
>
> Wrong again. You're the only one pushing the definition...and without
> any proof..other than you say so...so by "anyone's definition'...is
> simply not true is it?
> Try harder.
> Frank
>
> And you still have no idea who I am.
You are correct. I have no idea who you are. I know what you are. A
hypocrite, and if not that, a liar.
--
norm
> norm wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> norm wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have no idea what I am, but you still remain a hypocrite.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Well norm, I don't think so.
>>> If you calling me a hypocrite is the best you can come with, and
>>> that's your best shot, sorry, but it is not near good enough.
>>
>> Good enough for what? You?
>
> Not good enough to mean anything to anyone except you. It's only your
> uneducated and unsubstantiated personal opinion. You speak only for
> yourself, right?
"It's only your uneducated and unsubstantiated personal opinion". As
opposed to what from your quarter? You can attempt to walk this around
in circles all you want. What is unsubstantiated? You stated (quite
strongly) that you believe in God. With that belief comes responsibility
for one's words and actions. Your words and actions belie such a belief.
You are a hypocrite by definition. The other possibility is that you do
not believe in God, even though you state that you do. In that case, you
are simply a liar.
>
>>
>>> And only coming up with a cut/paste dictionary definition doesn't
>>> make me one nor does you calling me one make me one cause I'm not a
>>> hypocrite by your's or anyone else's definition.
>>
>> Sure you are.
>
> hahaha...sorry norm, but that's just not true. Your opinion is owned
> only by you and it's totally meaningless especially to me, the person
> you're trying to hang it on.
> Try again
>>
>>> And just because you want it to doesn't mean it does.
>>> Too bad!
>>> Try harder.
>>
>> Don't need to.
>>
> Then you give up and concede that you're wrong, right?
> Otherwise your argument just fell completely apart.
>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> Oh, and one other thing.
>>> You have no idea who I am either!
>>
>> Sure I do. You are a hypocrite, by anyone's definition.
>
> Wrong again. You're the only one pushing the definition...and without
> any proof..other than you say so...so by "anyone's definition'...is
> simply not true is it?
> Try harder.
> Frank
>
> And you still have no idea who I am.
You are correct. I have no idea who you are. I know what you are. A
hypocrite, and if not that, a liar.
--
norm