A
ARUNABHABISWAS1
I REVIEWED MY OWN POSTING / MY OWN KNOWLEDGE GATHERED FRON INTERNET & COMMENTS MADE BY DIFFERENT PAERTCIPANTS. I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE MY FINDINGS
1) I DO NOT KNOW THE TERMS OF CONTRACT BETWEEN MICROSOFT USA AND OEM'S FOR USING MICROSOFT SOFTWARES IN MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES,, WHAT IS GATHERED IS THAT, AT THE OUTSET, MICROSOFT USA (THE PARENT COMPANY) SELL ITS SOFTWARES (WHERE EVERY OS /SOFTWARES HAS UNIQUE NO.) AND COLLECTS. THE ROYALTY /LICENSE FEES ON THE BASIS OF THAT.
2) THE OEMS , NOW-A-DAYS. USE GENERIC VERSION OF DRIVERS/EVEN OS- LIKE LINUX WHICH IS FREE , AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET CREATED BY A THIRD PARTY. HENCE THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY LICENSE FEES TO MICROSOFT FOR THESE PRODUCT.
3) HENCE MANUFACURED/ FAKE INVOICES CREATED BY ANY COMPANY AT TH POINT OF SALES IN THAT HOST COUNTRY, DO NOT CALL FOR ANY PENAL ACTION FROM USA .
4) BUT THE HOST COUNTRY LOOSES ITS TAXES/REVINUES BECAUSE THERE IS NO AUTHENTICATION OF THE PRODUCT TO BE ORIGINAL . (HERE IN MY CASE , IT HAS BEEN SHOWN AS REPLACEMENT WHERE NO TAX IS APPLICATBLE - TO AVOID DOUBLE TAXATION ).
END RESULT, THE HOST COUNTRY LOOSES ITS REVINUES BECAUSE OF FAKE INVOICE THUS CREATED AND THE PARTNERS OF USA COMPANYS ENJOY THIS REVINUES ILLEGALLY.
I INVITE COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBERS WHO HAS EXPOSER / KNOWLEDGE OF LAW OF LAND OF HOST COUNTRY.
Continue reading...
1) I DO NOT KNOW THE TERMS OF CONTRACT BETWEEN MICROSOFT USA AND OEM'S FOR USING MICROSOFT SOFTWARES IN MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES,, WHAT IS GATHERED IS THAT, AT THE OUTSET, MICROSOFT USA (THE PARENT COMPANY) SELL ITS SOFTWARES (WHERE EVERY OS /SOFTWARES HAS UNIQUE NO.) AND COLLECTS. THE ROYALTY /LICENSE FEES ON THE BASIS OF THAT.
2) THE OEMS , NOW-A-DAYS. USE GENERIC VERSION OF DRIVERS/EVEN OS- LIKE LINUX WHICH IS FREE , AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET CREATED BY A THIRD PARTY. HENCE THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY LICENSE FEES TO MICROSOFT FOR THESE PRODUCT.
3) HENCE MANUFACURED/ FAKE INVOICES CREATED BY ANY COMPANY AT TH POINT OF SALES IN THAT HOST COUNTRY, DO NOT CALL FOR ANY PENAL ACTION FROM USA .
4) BUT THE HOST COUNTRY LOOSES ITS TAXES/REVINUES BECAUSE THERE IS NO AUTHENTICATION OF THE PRODUCT TO BE ORIGINAL . (HERE IN MY CASE , IT HAS BEEN SHOWN AS REPLACEMENT WHERE NO TAX IS APPLICATBLE - TO AVOID DOUBLE TAXATION ).
END RESULT, THE HOST COUNTRY LOOSES ITS REVINUES BECAUSE OF FAKE INVOICE THUS CREATED AND THE PARTNERS OF USA COMPANYS ENJOY THIS REVINUES ILLEGALLY.
I INVITE COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBERS WHO HAS EXPOSER / KNOWLEDGE OF LAW OF LAND OF HOST COUNTRY.
Continue reading...