- Thread starter
- #21
P
philo
<snip>
> >
> > Heck , I don't know how it works <G>
> > but you can read a little more here:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_file_system
> >
> > As to your new machine...Yes...I'd probably go for XP for now.
> >
> > Once SP1 is released for Vista, it might be sufficiently de-bugged
though
>
> Egads. I don't want Vista!! The LAST thing I ever want is more
> albatross bloatware!! (And DRM-ware, and BigBrother-ware).
>
> I'm just a firm believer and subscriber of the "lean and mean" approach -
> for an operating system, and for almost all my software, which is why I
> still love Win98SE, and occasionally even DOS! So, I'm going into this
> with "mixed" expectations.
>
>
I agree with lean and mean!
Most of my systems use Win2k.
It runs all the apps I need...and I want an OS that's as transparent as
possible!
> >
> > Heck , I don't know how it works <G>
> > but you can read a little more here:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_file_system
> >
> > As to your new machine...Yes...I'd probably go for XP for now.
> >
> > Once SP1 is released for Vista, it might be sufficiently de-bugged
though
>
> Egads. I don't want Vista!! The LAST thing I ever want is more
> albatross bloatware!! (And DRM-ware, and BigBrother-ware).
>
> I'm just a firm believer and subscriber of the "lean and mean" approach -
> for an operating system, and for almost all my software, which is why I
> still love Win98SE, and occasionally even DOS! So, I'm going into this
> with "mixed" expectations.
>
>
I agree with lean and mean!
Most of my systems use Win2k.
It runs all the apps I need...and I want an OS that's as transparent as
possible!