S
StargateFan
Thank you! 
What is final, last windows update, security file we should dl for Win98SE?
- Thread starter
- #2
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (918439)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (917344)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (917734)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (918547)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
==============================
All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended on
11 Jul-06.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
StargateFan wrote:
> Thank you!
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (918439)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (917344)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (917734)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code
Execution (918547)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
==============================
All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended on
11 Jul-06.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
StargateFan wrote:
> Thank you!
- Thread starter
- #3
T
thanatoid
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
> (916281)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
> mspx
>
> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (918439)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
> mspx
>
> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (917344)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
> mspx
>
> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (917734)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
> mspx
>
> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
> mspx ==============================
> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
OP:
The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
machine.
So:
1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
program.
3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
4. Do not use MS Office.
There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
products claiming to perform the above functions.
5. Forget about the word "update".
Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
of updates for 98SE is at:
http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
> (916281)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
> mspx
>
> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (918439)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
> mspx
>
> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (917344)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
> mspx
>
> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
> Remote Code Execution (917734)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
> mspx
>
> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
> mspx ==============================
> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
OP:
The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
machine.
So:
1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
program.
3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
4. Do not use MS Office.
There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
products claiming to perform the above functions.
5. Forget about the word "update".
Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
of updates for 98SE is at:
http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
- Thread starter
- #4
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else, 'toid.
thanatoid wrote:
<snip>
> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
> basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
> with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
> problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
> when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
> malware that will run on 98 anymore...
thanatoid wrote:
<snip>
> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
> basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
> with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
> problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
> when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
> malware that will run on 98 anymore...
- Thread starter
- #5
B
Bill in Co.
Maybe he could try the Win 3.1 newsgroup.
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else, 'toid.
>
> thanatoid wrote:
> <snip>
>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>> basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>> with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>> problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>> when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>> malware that will run on 98 anymore...
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else, 'toid.
>
> thanatoid wrote:
> <snip>
>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>> basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>> with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>> problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>> when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>> malware that will run on 98 anymore...
- Thread starter
- #6
M
MEB
Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
16...12-13-2007.
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
|
| MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (918439)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
|
| MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (917344)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
|
| MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (917734)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
|
| MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
Code
| Execution (918547)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| ==============================
| All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
| updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
on
| 11 Jul-06.
| --
| ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
|
| StargateFan wrote:
| > Thank you!
|
Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
16...12-13-2007.
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
|
| MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (918439)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
|
| MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (917344)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
|
| MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
| Execution (917734)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
|
| MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
Code
| Execution (918547)
| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| ==============================
| All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
| updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
on
| 11 Jul-06.
| --
| ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
|
| StargateFan wrote:
| > Thank you!
|
- Thread starter
- #7
T
thanatoid
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ulx#dwOcIHA.4696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
> 'toid.
Nice job top-posting, PA. And what a surprising post from a
brainwashed MS slave.
> thanatoid wrote:
> <snip>
>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them
>> have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1%
>> has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering engines"
>> etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs. Not to
>> mention few people write malware that will run on 98
>> anymore...
>
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:ulx#dwOcIHA.4696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
> 'toid.
Nice job top-posting, PA. And what a surprising post from a
brainwashed MS slave.
> thanatoid wrote:
> <snip>
>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them
>> have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1%
>> has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering engines"
>> etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs. Not to
>> mention few people write malware that will run on 98
>> anymore...
>
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
- Thread starter
- #8
T
thanatoid
"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:uqxN6zOcIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
> Maybe he could try the Win 3.1 newsgroup.
Nice job top-posting, Bill. And what a surprising post from
someone who has repeatedly proven he REALLY knows what he's
talking about.
> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
>> 'toid.
>>
>> thanatoid wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of
>>> them have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other
>>> 1% has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering
>>> engines" etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs.
>>> Not to mention few people write malware that will run on
>>> 98 anymore...
>
>
>
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:uqxN6zOcIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
> Maybe he could try the Win 3.1 newsgroup.
Nice job top-posting, Bill. And what a surprising post from
someone who has repeatedly proven he REALLY knows what he's
talking about.
> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
>> 'toid.
>>
>> thanatoid wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of
>>> them have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other
>>> 1% has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering
>>> engines" etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs.
>>> Not to mention few people write malware that will run on
>>> 98 anymore...
>
>
>
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
- Thread starter
- #9
S
StargateFan
On 16 Feb 2008 19:47:52 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid>
wrote:
>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
>> (916281)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (918439)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (917344)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (917734)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
>> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
>> mspx ==============================
>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
>> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
>> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
>> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
>
>OP:
>
>The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
>more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
>machine.
>
>So:
>
>1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
>help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
>entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
>MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
Been using Firefox for a few years now <g>.
>2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
>program.
Agent many years before that <g> ...
>3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
Good. Safe there, too. Years ago heard of problems and have only
ever used WMP6 Classic!
>4. Do not use MS Office.
Ouch. That's a toughie since still I still work in office. Despite
my indifference to anything M$, have to say that nothing comes close
to Outlook, Excel and PowerPoint! These 3 apps make up for some of
the garbage the rest of the whole M$ family is!
However, hate to say it but I'm migrating over to Linux so this won't
be as big an issue. Have had XP for about 15 months now and it's
eroded what little patience I had left since Win98SE went. After
98SE, Windows has steadily progressed downhill! 98SE was superb
can't say very much positive about 2K and virtually nothing good about
XP. Oh ... my mistake ... XP is very pretty!
However, a colleague gave me his old computer that was gathering dust.
It's small, just 20gigs but I'm looking forward to using Win98SE
again. Despite any inherent system designs/flaws with 98SE, went
nearly 8 years at home virtually problem-free on it. One of the
reasons I'm enjoying Linux forays is the ease of use and knowing that
I'm returning to a text-based user interface alongside a GUI-based
one. That was one of Win98SE's strengths for me.
>There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
>products claiming to perform the above functions.
Yeah, going to learn OpenOffice since it comes packaged with the Linux
distro I'm currently looking at. I'll probably eventually switch
everything M$ to OO. Just will take some time <g>.
>5. Forget about the word "update".
<g> I never did do the update thing. But now that Win98SE is no
longer supported, my plan is to dl the last, comprehensive "update"
and after installing Win98SE, apply it and that's the end of that.
>Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
>you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
>of updates for 98SE is at:
>
>http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
Thanks! I'm actually not an update fan but a colleague harped on and
on about it this week I may take the plunge with the "new" box a
colleague gave to me that I mention above. I prefer to install
Win98SE and maintain security apps on it rather than updating even
though everyone always harps on about the no-no aspect of that.
As an aside, nice to know that Linux seems to be run on a better
foundation. Can't tell you how many Windows users in my circle of
family and friends who are not computer literate have had their
computers run into the ground because they didn't know they need
firewalls, anti-virus apps, anti-spyware apps, anti- ..., ad
infinitum, ad nauseum!
But getting back to 98SE, it is and always will be my favourite
Windows flavour. It allowed me extreme control, the registry never
talked back to me, every single change I _ever_ made to it or the
system in general was _always_ obeyed ...
For the 15 months, I've fought daily battles for dominance and control
over my stupid XP box which gives me nothing but trouble. XP experts
on the ngs never solved the details vs. large icons war! _None_ of
their expertise did one bit of good! <ha!> I've even had to use a WE
replacement (such a stupid thing to have to find alternative for!).
Anyway, thanks for the help, guys. Much appreciated. Last thing to
say is that who wants the latest Ferarri that limps along and gives
less-than-ideal mileage when the sleek volkswagen outstrips it in
performance every time (not talking the hardware advances undoubtably
good. Just don't need 'em! Performance and reliability much more
important to me!)D
wrote:
>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
>> (916281)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (918439)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (917344)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
>> Remote Code Execution (917734)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
>> mspx
>>
>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
>> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
>> mspx ==============================
>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
>> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
>> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
>> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
>
>OP:
>
>The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
>more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
>machine.
>
>So:
>
>1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
>help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
>entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
>MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
Been using Firefox for a few years now <g>.
>2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
>program.
Agent many years before that <g> ...
>3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
Good. Safe there, too. Years ago heard of problems and have only
ever used WMP6 Classic!
>4. Do not use MS Office.
Ouch. That's a toughie since still I still work in office. Despite
my indifference to anything M$, have to say that nothing comes close
to Outlook, Excel and PowerPoint! These 3 apps make up for some of
the garbage the rest of the whole M$ family is!
However, hate to say it but I'm migrating over to Linux so this won't
be as big an issue. Have had XP for about 15 months now and it's
eroded what little patience I had left since Win98SE went. After
98SE, Windows has steadily progressed downhill! 98SE was superb
can't say very much positive about 2K and virtually nothing good about
XP. Oh ... my mistake ... XP is very pretty!
However, a colleague gave me his old computer that was gathering dust.
It's small, just 20gigs but I'm looking forward to using Win98SE
again. Despite any inherent system designs/flaws with 98SE, went
nearly 8 years at home virtually problem-free on it. One of the
reasons I'm enjoying Linux forays is the ease of use and knowing that
I'm returning to a text-based user interface alongside a GUI-based
one. That was one of Win98SE's strengths for me.
>There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
>products claiming to perform the above functions.
Yeah, going to learn OpenOffice since it comes packaged with the Linux
distro I'm currently looking at. I'll probably eventually switch
everything M$ to OO. Just will take some time <g>.
>5. Forget about the word "update".
<g> I never did do the update thing. But now that Win98SE is no
longer supported, my plan is to dl the last, comprehensive "update"
and after installing Win98SE, apply it and that's the end of that.
>Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
>you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
>of updates for 98SE is at:
>
>http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
Thanks! I'm actually not an update fan but a colleague harped on and
on about it this week I may take the plunge with the "new" box a
colleague gave to me that I mention above. I prefer to install
Win98SE and maintain security apps on it rather than updating even
though everyone always harps on about the no-no aspect of that.
As an aside, nice to know that Linux seems to be run on a better
foundation. Can't tell you how many Windows users in my circle of
family and friends who are not computer literate have had their
computers run into the ground because they didn't know they need
firewalls, anti-virus apps, anti-spyware apps, anti- ..., ad
infinitum, ad nauseum!
But getting back to 98SE, it is and always will be my favourite
Windows flavour. It allowed me extreme control, the registry never
talked back to me, every single change I _ever_ made to it or the
system in general was _always_ obeyed ...
For the 15 months, I've fought daily battles for dominance and control
over my stupid XP box which gives me nothing but trouble. XP experts
on the ngs never solved the details vs. large icons war! _None_ of
their expertise did one bit of good! <ha!> I've even had to use a WE
replacement (such a stupid thing to have to find alternative for!).
Anyway, thanks for the help, guys. Much appreciated. Last thing to
say is that who wants the latest Ferarri that limps along and gives
less-than-ideal mileage when the sleek volkswagen outstrips it in
performance every time (not talking the hardware advances undoubtably
good. Just don't need 'em! Performance and reliability much more
important to me!)
D- Thread starter
- #10
S
StargateFan
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:51:16 -0500, "MEB" <meb@not here@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
>Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
>16...12-13-2007.
Thanks.
>MEB
>http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
>_________
>
>
>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>| MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>|
>| MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (918439)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>|
>| MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (917344)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>|
>| MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (917734)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>|
>| MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>Code
>| Execution (918547)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>| ==============================
>| All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>| http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>| http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>| updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
>on
>| 11 Jul-06.
>| --
>| ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>| MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>| AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>| DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>|
>| StargateFan wrote:
>| > Thank you!
>|
>
wrote:
> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
>Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
>16...12-13-2007.
Thanks.
>MEB
>http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
>_________
>
>
>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>| MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>|
>| MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (918439)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>|
>| MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (917344)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>|
>| MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>| Execution (917734)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>|
>| MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>Code
>| Execution (918547)
>| http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>| ==============================
>| All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>| http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>| http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>| updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
>on
>| 11 Jul-06.
>| --
>| ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>| MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>| AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>| DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>|
>| StargateFan wrote:
>| > Thank you!
>|
>
- Thread starter
- #11
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
[That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
MEB wrote:
> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
> 16...12-13-2007.
>
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>>
>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (918439)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>>
>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (917344)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>>
>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (917734)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>>
>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>> Code
>> Execution (918547)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>> ==============================
>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
>> on
>> 11 Jul-06.
>> --
>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>
>> StargateFan wrote:
>>> Thank you!
MEB wrote:
> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
> 16...12-13-2007.
>
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>>
>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (918439)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>>
>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (917344)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>>
>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>> Execution (917734)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>>
>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>> Code
>> Execution (918547)
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>> ==============================
>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x ended
>> on
>> 11 Jul-06.
>> --
>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>
>> StargateFan wrote:
>>> Thank you!
- Thread starter
- #12
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
I rest my case.
thanatoid wrote:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:ulx#dwOcIHA.4696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
>> 'toid.
>
> Nice job top-posting, PA. And what a surprising post from a
> brainwashed MS slave.
>
>> thanatoid wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them
>>> have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1%
>>> has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering engines"
>>> etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs. Not to
>>> mention few people write malware that will run on 98
>>> anymore...
thanatoid wrote:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:ulx#dwOcIHA.4696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>> What a crock of OT FUD. Go peddle it someplace else,
>> 'toid.
>
> Nice job top-posting, PA. And what a surprising post from a
> brainwashed MS slave.
>
>> thanatoid wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points
>>> out the basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them
>>> have to do with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1%
>>> has to do with problems in MS "graphics rendering engines"
>>> etc. and ONLY occur when running MS programs. Not to
>>> mention few people write malware that will run on 98
>>> anymore...
- Thread starter
- #13
M
MEB
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
| [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the numerous
functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts {like
one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby are
NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype about
better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they happen
to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of the
supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked environments]...
Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
|
| MEB wrote:
| > Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
| > Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
| > 16...12-13-2007.
| >
| > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| >> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (918439)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (917344)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (917734)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
| >> Code
| >> Execution (918547)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| >> ==============================
| >> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| >> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| >> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
| >> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
ended
| >> on
| >> 11 Jul-06.
| >> --
| >> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| >> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| >> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| >> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
| >>
| >> StargateFan wrote:
| >>> Thank you!
|
news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
| [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the numerous
functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts {like
one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby are
NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype about
better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they happen
to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of the
supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked environments]...
Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
|
| MEB wrote:
| > Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
| > Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
| > 16...12-13-2007.
| >
| > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| >> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (918439)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (917344)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
| >> Execution (917734)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
| >>
| >> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
| >> Code
| >> Execution (918547)
| >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| >> ==============================
| >> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| >> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| >> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
| >> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
ended
| >> on
| >> 11 Jul-06.
| >> --
| >> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| >> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| >> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| >> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
| >>
| >> StargateFan wrote:
| >>> Thank you!
|
- Thread starter
- #14
G
Gary S. Terhune
WARNING!!!
"Thanatoid" is not a real being and in particular is missing key components
that result in his not being human at all. He has exhibited plenty of
anti-human behavior in these groups. Agree with him on specific issues if
you must, but don't fall in to the trap of thinking he's a "kindred spirit".
He WILL turn on you and injury may result.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com
"StargateFan" <IDon'tAcceptSpam@IDon'tAcceptSpam.com> wrote in message
news:0d5fr3hboae3i6djeg76cuesu4i4cnoe94@4ax.com...
> On 16 Feb 2008 19:47:52 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
>>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
>>> (916281)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (918439)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (917344)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (917734)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
>>> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
>>> mspx ==============================
>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
>>> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
>>> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
>>> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
>>
>>OP:
>>
>>The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>>basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>>with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>>problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>>when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>>malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
>>more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
>>machine.
>>
>>So:
>>
>>1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
>>help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
>>entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
>>MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
>
> Been using Firefox for a few years now <g>.
>
>>2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
>>program.
>
> Agent many years before that <g> ...
>
>>3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
>
> Good. Safe there, too. Years ago heard of problems and have only
> ever used WMP6 Classic!
>
>>4. Do not use MS Office.
>
> Ouch. That's a toughie since still I still work in office. Despite
> my indifference to anything M$, have to say that nothing comes close
> to Outlook, Excel and PowerPoint! These 3 apps make up for some of
> the garbage the rest of the whole M$ family is!
>
> However, hate to say it but I'm migrating over to Linux so this won't
> be as big an issue. Have had XP for about 15 months now and it's
> eroded what little patience I had left since Win98SE went. After
> 98SE, Windows has steadily progressed downhill! 98SE was superb
> can't say very much positive about 2K and virtually nothing good about
> XP. Oh ... my mistake ... XP is very pretty!
>
> However, a colleague gave me his old computer that was gathering dust.
> It's small, just 20gigs but I'm looking forward to using Win98SE
> again. Despite any inherent system designs/flaws with 98SE, went
> nearly 8 years at home virtually problem-free on it. One of the
> reasons I'm enjoying Linux forays is the ease of use and knowing that
> I'm returning to a text-based user interface alongside a GUI-based
> one. That was one of Win98SE's strengths for me.
>
>>There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
>>products claiming to perform the above functions.
>
> Yeah, going to learn OpenOffice since it comes packaged with the Linux
> distro I'm currently looking at. I'll probably eventually switch
> everything M$ to OO. Just will take some time <g>.
>
>>5. Forget about the word "update".
>
> <g> I never did do the update thing. But now that Win98SE is no
> longer supported, my plan is to dl the last, comprehensive "update"
> and after installing Win98SE, apply it and that's the end of that.
>
>>Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
>>you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
>>of updates for 98SE is at:
>>
>>http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
>
> Thanks! I'm actually not an update fan but a colleague harped on and
> on about it this week I may take the plunge with the "new" box a
> colleague gave to me that I mention above. I prefer to install
> Win98SE and maintain security apps on it rather than updating even
> though everyone always harps on about the no-no aspect of that.
>
> As an aside, nice to know that Linux seems to be run on a better
> foundation. Can't tell you how many Windows users in my circle of
> family and friends who are not computer literate have had their
> computers run into the ground because they didn't know they need
> firewalls, anti-virus apps, anti-spyware apps, anti- ..., ad
> infinitum, ad nauseum!
>
> But getting back to 98SE, it is and always will be my favourite
> Windows flavour. It allowed me extreme control, the registry never
> talked back to me, every single change I _ever_ made to it or the
> system in general was _always_ obeyed ...
>
> For the 15 months, I've fought daily battles for dominance and control
> over my stupid XP box which gives me nothing but trouble. XP experts
> on the ngs never solved the details vs. large icons war! _None_ of
> their expertise did one bit of good! <ha!> I've even had to use a WE
> replacement (such a stupid thing to have to find alternative for!).
>
> Anyway, thanks for the help, guys. Much appreciated. Last thing to
> say is that who wants the latest Ferarri that limps along and gives
> less-than-ideal mileage when the sleek volkswagen outstrips it in
> performance every time (not talking the hardware advances undoubtably
> good. Just don't need 'em! Performance and reliability much more
> important to me!)D
>
"Thanatoid" is not a real being and in particular is missing key components
that result in his not being human at all. He has exhibited plenty of
anti-human behavior in these groups. Agree with him on specific issues if
you must, but don't fall in to the trap of thinking he's a "kindred spirit".
He WILL turn on you and injury may result.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com
"StargateFan" <IDon'tAcceptSpam@IDon'tAcceptSpam.com> wrote in message
news:0d5fr3hboae3i6djeg76cuesu4i4cnoe94@4ax.com...
> On 16 Feb 2008 19:47:52 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in
>>news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
>>> (916281)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (918439)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (917344)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow
>>> Remote Code Execution (917734)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.
>>> mspx
>>>
>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could
>>> Allow Remote Code Execution (918547)
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.
>>> mspx ==============================
>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are
>>> available at http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp
>>> . No more updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06
>>> Support fot Win9x ended on 11 Jul-06.
>>
>>OP:
>>
>>The above info is extremely helpful as it clearly points out the
>>basic fact about MS updates, i.e. that 99% of them have to do
>>with IE/OE, MS Office, and WMP. The other 1% has to do with
>>problems in MS "graphics rendering engines" etc. and ONLY occur
>>when running MS programs. Not to mention few people write
>>malware that will run on 98 anymore. XP and Disasta offer MUCH
>>more exciting opportunities for making a real mess of your
>>machine.
>>
>>So:
>>
>>1. Do not use Internet Explorer for anything except viewing chm
>>help files (thank you Microsoft). (You can actually remove IE
>>entirely with the program from www.litepc.com in spite of what
>>MS and its brainwashed slaves claim).
>
> Been using Firefox for a few years now <g>.
>
>>2. Get a real browser, a real newsreader and a real mail
>>program.
>
> Agent many years before that <g> ...
>
>>3. Do not use Windows Media Player (duuh).
>
> Good. Safe there, too. Years ago heard of problems and have only
> ever used WMP6 Classic!
>
>>4. Do not use MS Office.
>
> Ouch. That's a toughie since still I still work in office. Despite
> my indifference to anything M$, have to say that nothing comes close
> to Outlook, Excel and PowerPoint! These 3 apps make up for some of
> the garbage the rest of the whole M$ family is!
>
> However, hate to say it but I'm migrating over to Linux so this won't
> be as big an issue. Have had XP for about 15 months now and it's
> eroded what little patience I had left since Win98SE went. After
> 98SE, Windows has steadily progressed downhill! 98SE was superb
> can't say very much positive about 2K and virtually nothing good about
> XP. Oh ... my mistake ... XP is very pretty!
>
> However, a colleague gave me his old computer that was gathering dust.
> It's small, just 20gigs but I'm looking forward to using Win98SE
> again. Despite any inherent system designs/flaws with 98SE, went
> nearly 8 years at home virtually problem-free on it. One of the
> reasons I'm enjoying Linux forays is the ease of use and knowing that
> I'm returning to a text-based user interface alongside a GUI-based
> one. That was one of Win98SE's strengths for me.
>
>>There are far superior and usually free alternatives for all MS
>>products claiming to perform the above functions.
>
> Yeah, going to learn OpenOffice since it comes packaged with the Linux
> distro I'm currently looking at. I'll probably eventually switch
> everything M$ to OO. Just will take some time <g>.
>
>>5. Forget about the word "update".
>
> <g> I never did do the update thing. But now that Win98SE is no
> longer supported, my plan is to dl the last, comprehensive "update"
> and after installing Win98SE, apply it and that's the end of that.
>
>>Should you decide not to follow the sage advice above, and if
>>you really enjoy wading deep in the MS mud, an excellent source
>>of updates for 98SE is at:
>>
>>http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html
>
> Thanks! I'm actually not an update fan but a colleague harped on and
> on about it this week I may take the plunge with the "new" box a
> colleague gave to me that I mention above. I prefer to install
> Win98SE and maintain security apps on it rather than updating even
> though everyone always harps on about the no-no aspect of that.
>
> As an aside, nice to know that Linux seems to be run on a better
> foundation. Can't tell you how many Windows users in my circle of
> family and friends who are not computer literate have had their
> computers run into the ground because they didn't know they need
> firewalls, anti-virus apps, anti-spyware apps, anti- ..., ad
> infinitum, ad nauseum!
>
> But getting back to 98SE, it is and always will be my favourite
> Windows flavour. It allowed me extreme control, the registry never
> talked back to me, every single change I _ever_ made to it or the
> system in general was _always_ obeyed ...
>
> For the 15 months, I've fought daily battles for dominance and control
> over my stupid XP box which gives me nothing but trouble. XP experts
> on the ngs never solved the details vs. large icons war! _None_ of
> their expertise did one bit of good! <ha!> I've even had to use a WE
> replacement (such a stupid thing to have to find alternative for!).
>
> Anyway, thanks for the help, guys. Much appreciated. Last thing to
> say is that who wants the latest Ferarri that limps along and gives
> less-than-ideal mileage when the sleek volkswagen outstrips it in
> performance every time (not talking the hardware advances undoubtably
> good. Just don't need 'em! Performance and reliability much more
> important to me!)
D>
- Thread starter
- #15
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
I presumed you were referring to Root Certificates updates, MEB. If such is
not the case, ignore my last reply.
MEB wrote:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
>
> Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
> presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the numerous
> functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts
> {like
> one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
> qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby
> are
> NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype about
> better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they
> happen
> to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of
> the
> supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked environments]...
> Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
>
>
>>
>> MEB wrote:
>>> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
>>> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
>>> 16...12-13-2007.
>>>
>>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (918439)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (917344)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (917734)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>>>> Code
>>>> Execution (918547)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>>>> ==============================
>>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>>>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>>>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
>>>> ended
>>>> on
>>>> 11 Jul-06.
>>>> --
>>>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>>>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>>>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>>>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>>>
>>>> StargateFan wrote:
>>>>> Thank you!
not the case, ignore my last reply.
MEB wrote:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
>
> Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
> presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the numerous
> functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts
> {like
> one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
> qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby
> are
> NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype about
> better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they
> happen
> to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of
> the
> supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked environments]...
> Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
>
>
>>
>> MEB wrote:
>>> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
>>> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
>>> 16...12-13-2007.
>>>
>>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (918439)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (917344)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code
>>>> Execution (917734)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
>>>>
>>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote
>>>> Code
>>>> Execution (918547)
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
>>>> ==============================
>>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
>>>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
>>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No more
>>>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
>>>> ended
>>>> on
>>>> 11 Jul-06.
>>>> --
>>>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>>>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>>>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>>>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>>>
>>>> StargateFan wrote:
>>>>> Thank you!
- Thread starter
- #16
T
thanatoid
"Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in
news:#xio9jXcIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
> WARNING!!!
>
> "Thanatoid" is not a real being and in particular is
> missing key components that result in his not being human
> at all. He has exhibited plenty of anti-human behavior in
> these groups. Agree with him on specific issues if you
> must, but don't fall in to the trap of thinking he's a
> "kindred spirit". He WILL turn on you and injury may
> result.
>
"Into" a trap, Gary. Not "in to". Sigh.
I disabled my KF because it's been getting really boring, so I
saw this post. You REALLY should know how to spell my nym by
now.
Aside from that, you actually managed to be funny (and somewhat
insightful, too, although that I suspect is more of an
incidental result of overextending the joke). Congratulations.
Quite a change from the usual same-old.
Do I have your permission to use this post (including the
author's and NG name) as my new sig?
Regards
t.
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:#xio9jXcIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
> WARNING!!!
>
> "Thanatoid" is not a real being and in particular is
> missing key components that result in his not being human
> at all. He has exhibited plenty of anti-human behavior in
> these groups. Agree with him on specific issues if you
> must, but don't fall in to the trap of thinking he's a
> "kindred spirit". He WILL turn on you and injury may
> result.
>
"Into" a trap, Gary. Not "in to". Sigh.
I disabled my KF because it's been getting really boring, so I
saw this post. You REALLY should know how to spell my nym by
now.
Aside from that, you actually managed to be funny (and somewhat
insightful, too, although that I suspect is more of an
incidental result of overextending the joke). Congratulations.
Quite a change from the usual same-old.
Do I have your permission to use this post (including the
author's and NG name) as my new sig?
Regards
t.
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
- Thread starter
- #17
M
MEB
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23vEuitYcIHA.6024@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| I presumed you were referring to Root Certificates updates, MEB. If such
is
| not the case, ignore my last reply.
Actually, I was referring to that in addition to other certificates which
you might be using or found on the Internet, and/or used within networks or
component applications. remember, not every 9X user is still using IE 6, but
may be using other browsers which CAN use the newer formatted Certs.
For instance, when using SSL, without the proper servers certificate and
its "rights" [such as on live.com] how would you suggest that users ensure
these scripts and other aspects are checked for validity?
Let's continue with Google and any of its offerings such as webmaster
tools, gmail, or other secured aspects. Without verified and valid
certificates, how would you suggest that a user be protected from a "blind
site" attack [a web page placed to ensnare the unsuspecting into the belief
its the actual site]? Merely by checking the address? Surely not...
Let's say your network has been configured with certificate verification
for applications or access generally, how would you suggest this is done
without valid and verified certificates [yous or other created]?
Let's look at IE 7, or one of the still supported browsers for 9X [a better
comparison] which rely heavily upon this type of verification for allowances
within the browser and upon the system, would you then be indicating that
these are unnecessary, and that these checks are, in fact, worthless?
This would be really interesting to those IE 7 users as that impliments
more of the "rights" and restrictions than IE 6 does, is it that IE 7 is
nothing more than a sham with nothing of value but perhaps a prettier [ugh]
interface?.
You, of course, using XP or VISTA, receive your certificate updates
automatically and invisibly, we, the 9X user do not. Would this perhaps then
indicate that we should be unconcered with these issues?
Or is it more, that you may fail to appreciate our needs and desires for
what these cetificates can mean within our systems?
Is it that you are suggesting that we should remain at the "END OF SUPPORT"
level, leaving us potentially vulnerable via ActiveX and the other which
might be encountered upon the Internet?
Or, perhaps, you're suggesting that ONLY via the use of one of Microsoft's
newer OSs can a user safely access the Internet?
Sorry about this, but I still use 9X, and not in a VM.
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
|
| MEB wrote:
| > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
| >> [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
| >
| > Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
| > presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the
numerous
| > functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts
| > {like
| > one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
| > qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby
| > are
| > NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype
about
| > better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they
| > happen
| > to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of
| > the
| > supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked
environments]...
| > Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
| >
| >
| >>
| >> MEB wrote:
| >>> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
| >>> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
| >>> 16...12-13-2007.
| >>>
| >>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >>> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| >>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| >>>> Execution (918439)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| >>>> Execution (917344)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote
Code
| >>>> Execution (917734)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow
Remote
| >>>> Code
| >>>> Execution (918547)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| >>>> ==============================
| >>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| >>>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| >>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No
more
| >>>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
| >>>> ended
| >>>> on
| >>>> 11 Jul-06.
| >>>> --
| >>>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| >>>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| >>>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| >>>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
| >>>>
| >>>> StargateFan wrote:
| >>>>> Thank you!
|
news:%23vEuitYcIHA.6024@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| I presumed you were referring to Root Certificates updates, MEB. If such
is
| not the case, ignore my last reply.
Actually, I was referring to that in addition to other certificates which
you might be using or found on the Internet, and/or used within networks or
component applications. remember, not every 9X user is still using IE 6, but
may be using other browsers which CAN use the newer formatted Certs.
For instance, when using SSL, without the proper servers certificate and
its "rights" [such as on live.com] how would you suggest that users ensure
these scripts and other aspects are checked for validity?
Let's continue with Google and any of its offerings such as webmaster
tools, gmail, or other secured aspects. Without verified and valid
certificates, how would you suggest that a user be protected from a "blind
site" attack [a web page placed to ensnare the unsuspecting into the belief
its the actual site]? Merely by checking the address? Surely not...
Let's say your network has been configured with certificate verification
for applications or access generally, how would you suggest this is done
without valid and verified certificates [yous or other created]?
Let's look at IE 7, or one of the still supported browsers for 9X [a better
comparison] which rely heavily upon this type of verification for allowances
within the browser and upon the system, would you then be indicating that
these are unnecessary, and that these checks are, in fact, worthless?
This would be really interesting to those IE 7 users as that impliments
more of the "rights" and restrictions than IE 6 does, is it that IE 7 is
nothing more than a sham with nothing of value but perhaps a prettier [ugh]
interface?.
You, of course, using XP or VISTA, receive your certificate updates
automatically and invisibly, we, the 9X user do not. Would this perhaps then
indicate that we should be unconcered with these issues?
Or is it more, that you may fail to appreciate our needs and desires for
what these cetificates can mean within our systems?
Is it that you are suggesting that we should remain at the "END OF SUPPORT"
level, leaving us potentially vulnerable via ActiveX and the other which
might be encountered upon the Internet?
Or, perhaps, you're suggesting that ONLY via the use of one of Microsoft's
newer OSs can a user safely access the Internet?
Sorry about this, but I still use 9X, and not in a VM.
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
|
| MEB wrote:
| > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:%23ddPVpTcIHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
| >> [That's not a critical security update, MEB.]
| >
| > Huh, I can't believe you said that,,, so from that presentation we can
| > presume that none of the Certificates are critical for any of the
numerous
| > functions they are used for, such as ensuring ActiveX objects, scripts
| > {like
| > one might find in .asp pages or .net apps], and DirectX are signed by
| > qualified and current authorities and that the "rights" assigned thereby
| > are
| > NOT critical nor are part of security , . hmm, okay, so all the hype
about
| > better security in XP and VISTA really IS pure crap then [since they
| > happen
| > to be used for even more functions in those environments and are one of
| > the
| > supposed key elements thereof, particularly in networked
environments]...
| > Thanks for correcting my error... ah yeah..
| >
| >
| >>
| >> MEB wrote:
| >>> Ah, though not officially supported, Microsoft did produce additional
| >>> Certificates updates, the last I downloaded for 9X was version
| >>> 16...12-13-2007.
| >>>
| >>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >>> news:ex3Q1nMcIHA.1960@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
| >>>> MS06-021 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (916281)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-021.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-022 Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code
| >>>> Execution (918439)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-022.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-023 Vulnerability in Microsoft JScript Could Allow Remote Code
| >>>> Execution (917344)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-023.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-024 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote
Code
| >>>> Execution (917734)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-024.mspx
| >>>>
| >>>> MS06-026 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow
Remote
| >>>> Code
| >>>> Execution (918547)
| >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-026.mspx
| >>>> ==============================
| >>>> All of the above were released on 13 Jun-06 and are available at
| >>>> http://windowsupdate/microsoft.com and
| >>>> http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp. No
more
| >>>> updates for Win9x were released after 13 Jun-06 Support fot Win9x
| >>>> ended
| >>>> on
| >>>> 11 Jul-06.
| >>>> --
| >>>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
| >>>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
| >>>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
| >>>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
| >>>>
| >>>> StargateFan wrote:
| >>>>> Thank you!
|
- Thread starter
- #18
T
thanatoid
"MEB" <meb@not here@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:eq3OQBbcIHA.4312@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23vEuitYcIHA.6024@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>| I presumed you were referring to Root Certificates
>| updates, MEB.
<SNIP>
> Is it that you are suggesting that we should remain at the
> "END OF SUPPORT"
> level, leaving us potentially vulnerable via ActiveX and
> the other which might be encountered upon the Internet?
> Or, perhaps, you're suggesting that ONLY via the use of
> one of Microsoft's
> newer OSs can a user safely access the Internet?
Of course that's what he's suggesting, he has to lick the hand
that feeds him! (Yes, I know MVP's "don't get any money from
MS".)
After all, Vista is the most stable, compatible, safest, and
best operating system Microsoft has ever released! Why, with the
stellar-performing Live OneCare including the award-winning
Windows Firewall, not to mention MS watching your every move on
the net, what, us worry?
(Sorry, MEB, it's one of those days.)
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:eq3OQBbcIHA.4312@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23vEuitYcIHA.6024@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>| I presumed you were referring to Root Certificates
>| updates, MEB.
<SNIP>
> Is it that you are suggesting that we should remain at the
> "END OF SUPPORT"
> level, leaving us potentially vulnerable via ActiveX and
> the other which might be encountered upon the Internet?
> Or, perhaps, you're suggesting that ONLY via the use of
> one of Microsoft's
> newer OSs can a user safely access the Internet?
Of course that's what he's suggesting, he has to lick the hand
that feeds him! (Yes, I know MVP's "don't get any money from
MS".)
After all, Vista is the most stable, compatible, safest, and
best operating system Microsoft has ever released! Why, with the
stellar-performing Live OneCare including the award-winning
Windows Firewall, not to mention MS watching your every move on
the net, what, us worry?
(Sorry, MEB, it's one of those days.)
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
- Thread starter
- #19
M
MEB
So I see, hey we all have those times when lashing out seems to at least
take away some of the daily pain...
But, I am trying to determine what PA actually meant regarding these
indications, so kinda "bear" with me on this one...
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
take away some of the daily pain...
But, I am trying to determine what PA actually meant regarding these
indications, so kinda "bear" with me on this one...
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
_________
- Thread starter
- #20
T
thanatoid
"MEB" <meb@not here@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:eE6#cvccIHA.6080@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
> So I see, hey we all have those times when lashing out
> seems to at least take away some of the daily pain...
It's a silly distraction until the final repose comes, yes...
Others often suffer as a result, I know this as well.
> But, I am trying to determine what PA actually meant
> regarding these
> indications, so kinda "bear" with me on this one...
As you know, there are many things I know nothing about. Like
about the intricacies of that point of your discussion - except
that several things kept cropping up in the discussion which
made me think "if they didn't use IE with its ActiveX component
they would not have most (if not all) of these problems". But I
could be wrong.
And I'll shut up now.
I hope he will be willing to clarify his stand on this for you.
Take care.
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek
news:eE6#cvccIHA.6080@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
> So I see, hey we all have those times when lashing out
> seems to at least take away some of the daily pain...
It's a silly distraction until the final repose comes, yes...
Others often suffer as a result, I know this as well.
> But, I am trying to determine what PA actually meant
> regarding these
> indications, so kinda "bear" with me on this one...
As you know, there are many things I know nothing about. Like
about the intricacies of that point of your discussion - except
that several things kept cropping up in the discussion which
made me think "if they didn't use IE with its ActiveX component
they would not have most (if not all) of these problems". But I
could be wrong.
And I'll shut up now.
I hope he will be willing to clarify his stand on this for you.
Take care.
--
"As you know, it is considered bad form to discuss the latest
news with persons from the beyond."
Karel Capek