Inbox contents simply vanished

L

Larry

> I just do it daily.

Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.

I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly. Someone in this thread
mentioned how to do that but I don't see it anymore.



"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:eDF3HCgkIHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the autocompacting
> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).
>
> I just do it daily.
>
> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> > Sooner or later, file corruption will hit every OE user. It only makes
> > sense to do what you can to avoid it.
> >
> > The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express:
> >

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/community/columns/filecorruption.mspx
> >
> >> ...I have an extremely active e-mail correspondence,
> >> and that's just not realistic for me.

> >
> > I send well over 100 messages a day using OE, just about every day of

the
> > week. If I can remember to take 2 minutes at the end of every day to
> > empty
> > Sent Items & Deleted Items folders and then compact all folders
> > (ALT+F+F+F),
> > you can, too.
> >
> > If you don't value your message store, keep doing what you've been
> > doing...and don't bother backing-up your message store either. <wink>
> > --
> > ~PA Bear
> >
> > Larry wrote:
> >> Thank you everyone.
> >>
> >> I just dragged the file, XXX.dbx, back into the OE folder, launched OE,
> >> did
> >> a file compact on the folder XXX, and it went down from 1.24 MB to 58

KB.
> >> So that settles that.
> >>
> >> As far as OE's vulnerabilty to this kind of disaster is concerned, I've
> >> been
> >> using the same OE program for over nine years and never lost the

contents
> >> of
> >> a folder and never heard of that happening. About a year ago, I began

to
> >> have computer freeze-ups when doing send-receive, and that's when PA

Baer
> >> (I
> >> think it was) gave me the instructions of OE maintenance, which I've
> >> followed pretty regularly since then. But not 100 percent! Not

keeping
> >> the
> >> Inbox completely empty! I have an extremely active e-mail
> >> correspondence,
> >> and that's just not realistic for me.
> >>
> >> "Bruce Hagen" <Nospam@mymail.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:uGu5ekakIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> >>> That reinforces what I thought. That is the file is empty, and the

size
> >>> would not reflect that there is mail in it as the size is not reduced
> >>> until
> >>> you compact.
> >>> --
> >>> Bruce Hagen
> >>> MS-MVP Outlook Express
> >>> Imperial Beach, CA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:%235VtCHXkIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >>>> Hi, sorry I didn't get back sooner.
> >>>>
> >>>> I downloaded OE Reader as recommended, browsed to the Inbox.dbx file
> >>>> (which
> >>>> I had renamed XXX.dbx and placed on the Desktop), and opened it.
> >> Message
> >>>> said:
> >>>>
> >>>> "File does not contain any message."
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet the file's size is 1.24 MB.
> >>>>
> >>>> Go figure.
> >>>>
> >>>> Larry
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "bobster" <fauxie@bogus.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:uyN57AIkIHA.4664@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >>>>> Try this. It's the successor to MiTec OE view. I use it and it

works
> >>>>> fine for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dbxviewer.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:erUy0yAkIHA.6032@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How

did
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24

MB?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> By seeing the size of the Inbox.dbx file in Windows Explorer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> > 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx
> >> files
> >>>> and
> >>>>> run
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did try OE Extract and it doesn't do anything and provides no
> >>>>> instructions, so I guess one of the nonfreeware apps is next.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "dadiOH" <someone@fuggetit.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:eGJ5QW$jIHA.4120@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >>>>>> Larry wrote:
> >>>>>>> Strange things going on (see below), but I think the problem may

be
> >>>>>>> solvable.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. The Inbox, prior to the problem, would have been around 80 or

90
> >>>>>>> MB. As I said, my procedure is to let it build up for a few weeks
> >>>>>>> and then move a lot of it into a custom folder. But after the
> >>>>>>> problem occurred, the Inbox was 130 KB. After I received e-mails
> >>>>>>> since this morning, it went up to about 400 KB.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. But here's the strange thing: just now I looked again, and

the
> >>>>>>> only Inbox.dbx in the OE folder has 1.24 MB!!! So somehow it's
> >>>>>>> returned.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How did
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24

MB?
> >>>>>> ________________
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 3. Yet the Inbox in the OE application is still just the e-mails
> >>>>>>> received since this morning.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Because it is screwed up. That is, whatever methodology used to
> >>>>>> determine messages start/end and/or count is wrong. Like a file

that
> >>>>>> has its EOF in the wrong place/
> >>>>>> __________________
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is what I'd do...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. Save a copy of Inbox.dbx somewhere
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx files
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> run it
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 3. If it is successful in getting your messages, save them as MAIL

(
> >>>>>> i.e., *.eml - separate, discrete messages) in a folder on your
> >>>>>> desktop.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If not successful, forget what follows.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 4. Delete Inbox.dbx using Explorer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 5. Open OE and display its Inbox - which should now be empty
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 6. Select all the recovered email messages in your temporary

desktop
> >>>>>> folder and drag them to the OE pane where they would normally be
> >>>>>> displayed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 7. Close OE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> dadiOH

>
>
 
B

Bill in Co.

It's not "so vulnerable" that that is required. I just do it daily as a
matter of routine, (and because I use OE quite a lot). You certainly
don't need to do it so religiously.

Larry wrote:
>> I just do it daily.

>
> Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
> continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.
>
> I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly. Someone in this
> thread
> mentioned how to do that but I don't see it anymore.
>
>
>
> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:eDF3HCgkIHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
>> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the autocompacting
>> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).
>>
>> I just do it daily.
>>
>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>> Sooner or later, file corruption will hit every OE user. It only makes
>>> sense to do what you can to avoid it.
>>>
>>> The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express:
>>>

> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/community/columns/filecorruption.mspx
>>>
>>>> ...I have an extremely active e-mail correspondence,
>>>> and that's just not realistic for me.
>>>
>>> I send well over 100 messages a day using OE, just about every day of
>>> the
>>> week. If I can remember to take 2 minutes at the end of every day to
>>> empty
>>> Sent Items & Deleted Items folders and then compact all folders
>>> (ALT+F+F+F),
>>> you can, too.
>>>
>>> If you don't value your message store, keep doing what you've been
>>> doing...and don't bother backing-up your message store either. <wink>
>>> --
>>> ~PA Bear
>>>
>>> Larry wrote:
>>>> Thank you everyone.
>>>>
>>>> I just dragged the file, XXX.dbx, back into the OE folder, launched OE,
>>>> did
>>>> a file compact on the folder XXX, and it went down from 1.24 MB to 58
>>>> KB.
>>>> So that settles that.
>>>>
>>>> As far as OE's vulnerabilty to this kind of disaster is concerned, I've
>>>> been
>>>> using the same OE program for over nine years and never lost the
>>>> contents
>>>> of
>>>> a folder and never heard of that happening. About a year ago, I began
>>>> to
>>>> have computer freeze-ups when doing send-receive, and that's when PA
>>>> Baer
>>>> (I
>>>> think it was) gave me the instructions of OE maintenance, which I've
>>>> followed pretty regularly since then. But not 100 percent! Not
>>>> keeping
>>>> the
>>>> Inbox completely empty! I have an extremely active e-mail
>>>> correspondence,
>>>> and that's just not realistic for me.
>>>>
>>>> "Bruce Hagen" <Nospam@mymail.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:uGu5ekakIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>> That reinforces what I thought. That is the file is empty, and the
>>>>> size
>>>>> would not reflect that there is mail in it as the size is not reduced
>>>>> until
>>>>> you compact.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bruce Hagen
>>>>> MS-MVP Outlook Express
>>>>> Imperial Beach, CA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:%235VtCHXkIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Hi, sorry I didn't get back sooner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I downloaded OE Reader as recommended, browsed to the Inbox.dbx file
>>>>>> (which
>>>>>> I had renamed XXX.dbx and placed on the Desktop), and opened it.
>>>>>> Message
>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "File does not contain any message."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet the file's size is 1.24 MB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go figure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Larry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "bobster" <fauxie@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:uyN57AIkIHA.4664@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Try this. It's the successor to MiTec OE view. I use it and it
>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>> fine for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dbxviewer.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:erUy0yAkIHA.6032@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How
>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24
>>>>>>> MB?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By seeing the size of the Inbox.dbx file in Windows Explorer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx
>>>> files
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did try OE Extract and it doesn't do anything and provides no
>>>>>>> instructions, so I guess one of the nonfreeware apps is next.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "dadiOH" <someone@fuggetit.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:eGJ5QW$jIHA.4120@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> Larry wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Strange things going on (see below), but I think the problem may
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> solvable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. The Inbox, prior to the problem, would have been around 80 or
>>>>>>>>> 90
>>>>>>>>> MB. As I said, my procedure is to let it build up for a few weeks
>>>>>>>>> and then move a lot of it into a custom folder. But after the
>>>>>>>>> problem occurred, the Inbox was 130 KB. After I received e-mails
>>>>>>>>> since this morning, it went up to about 400 KB.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. But here's the strange thing: just now I looked again, and
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> only Inbox.dbx in the OE folder has 1.24 MB!!! So somehow it's
>>>>>>>>> returned.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How did
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24
>>>>>>>> MB?
>>>>>>>> ________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3. Yet the Inbox in the OE application is still just the e-mails
>>>>>>>>> received since this morning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because it is screwed up. That is, whatever methodology used to
>>>>>>>> determine messages start/end and/or count is wrong. Like a file
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> has its EOF in the wrong place/
>>>>>>>> __________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is what I'd do...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Save a copy of Inbox.dbx somewhere
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx files
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> run it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. If it is successful in getting your messages, save them as MAIL
>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>> i.e., *.eml - separate, discrete messages) in a folder on your
>>>>>>>> desktop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If not successful, forget what follows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4. Delete Inbox.dbx using Explorer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5. Open OE and display its Inbox - which should now be empty
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6. Select all the recovered email messages in your temporary
>>>>>>>> desktop
>>>>>>>> folder and drag them to the OE pane where they would normally be
>>>>>>>> displayed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7. Close OE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dadiOH
 
B

Bill in Co.

Franc Zabkar wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:51:43 -0400, "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net>
> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>>> I just do it daily.


No, actually I wrote the statement above (attributions apparently snipped)
But it is certainly not necessary to do that! (as I pointed out in my
response).

>> Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
>> continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.


It's not "so vulnerable" as you seem to be implying. It's just good
practice.

>> I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly.

>
> Why don't you just set up a bunch of filters so that incoming messages
> are automatically sorted as to author or type and redirected into
> their own respective mailboxes, eg Family / Friends / Forums /
> Publications / Your_ISP / Junk / Spam?
>
> Is this even possible in OE?


But I thought we were talking about periodically compacting the message
store, in which case that won't help much in that regard.
 
F

Franc Zabkar

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:51:43 -0400, "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net>
put finger to keyboard and composed:

>> I just do it daily.

>
>Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
>continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.
>
>I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly.


Why don't you just set up a bunch of filters so that incoming messages
are automatically sorted as to author or type and redirected into
their own respective mailboxes, eg Family / Friends / Forums /
Publications / Your_ISP / Junk / Spam?

Is this even possible in OE?

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
 
F

Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message
news:pokuu39s0ck4g9l18v5fj0c39ocbdcd206@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:51:43 -0400, "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net>
> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>>> I just do it daily.

>>
>>Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
>>continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.
>>
>>I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly.

>
> Why don't you just set up a bunch of filters so that incoming messages
> are automatically sorted as to author or type and redirected into
> their own respective mailboxes, eg Family / Friends / Forums /
> Publications / Your_ISP / Junk / Spam?
>
> Is this even possible in OE?



Yes.

--
Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM
www.fjsmjs.com
Do not reply with email
 
B

Bruce Hagen

This freeware tool backs up everything in OE in seconds. Disregard what is
written in red. That is referring to a different program.

Outlook Express Quick Backup (OEQB):
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Outlook Express
Imperial Beach, CA


"Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
news:OVa3WpikIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> I just do it daily.

>
> Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
> continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.
>
> I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly. Someone in this
> thread
> mentioned how to do that but I don't see it anymore.
>
>
>
> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:eDF3HCgkIHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
>> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the autocompacting
>> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).
>>
>> I just do it daily.
>>
>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> > Sooner or later, file corruption will hit every OE user. It only makes
>> > sense to do what you can to avoid it.
>> >
>> > The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express:
>> >

> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/community/columns/filecorruption.mspx
>> >
>> >> ...I have an extremely active e-mail correspondence,
>> >> and that's just not realistic for me.
>> >
>> > I send well over 100 messages a day using OE, just about every day of

> the
>> > week. If I can remember to take 2 minutes at the end of every day to
>> > empty
>> > Sent Items & Deleted Items folders and then compact all folders
>> > (ALT+F+F+F),
>> > you can, too.
>> >
>> > If you don't value your message store, keep doing what you've been
>> > doing...and don't bother backing-up your message store either. <wink>
>> > --
>> > ~PA Bear
>> >
>> > Larry wrote:
>> >> Thank you everyone.
>> >>
>> >> I just dragged the file, XXX.dbx, back into the OE folder, launched
>> >> OE,
>> >> did
>> >> a file compact on the folder XXX, and it went down from 1.24 MB to 58

> KB.
>> >> So that settles that.
>> >>
>> >> As far as OE's vulnerabilty to this kind of disaster is concerned,
>> >> I've
>> >> been
>> >> using the same OE program for over nine years and never lost the

> contents
>> >> of
>> >> a folder and never heard of that happening. About a year ago, I began

> to
>> >> have computer freeze-ups when doing send-receive, and that's when PA

> Baer
>> >> (I
>> >> think it was) gave me the instructions of OE maintenance, which I've
>> >> followed pretty regularly since then. But not 100 percent! Not

> keeping
>> >> the
>> >> Inbox completely empty! I have an extremely active e-mail
>> >> correspondence,
>> >> and that's just not realistic for me.
>> >>
>> >> "Bruce Hagen" <Nospam@mymail.invalid> wrote in message
>> >> news:uGu5ekakIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> >>> That reinforces what I thought. That is the file is empty, and the

> size
>> >>> would not reflect that there is mail in it as the size is not reduced
>> >>> until
>> >>> you compact.
>> >>> --
>> >>> Bruce Hagen
>> >>> MS-MVP Outlook Express
>> >>> Imperial Beach, CA
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
>> >>> news:%235VtCHXkIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> >>>> Hi, sorry I didn't get back sooner.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I downloaded OE Reader as recommended, browsed to the Inbox.dbx file
>> >>>> (which
>> >>>> I had renamed XXX.dbx and placed on the Desktop), and opened it.
>> >> Message
>> >>>> said:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "File does not contain any message."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yet the file's size is 1.24 MB.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Go figure.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Larry
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "bobster" <fauxie@bogus.net> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:uyN57AIkIHA.4664@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> >>>>> Try this. It's the successor to MiTec OE view. I use it and it

> works
>> >>>>> fine for me.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dbxviewer.html
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
>> >>>>> news:erUy0yAkIHA.6032@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> >>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How

> did
>> >>>>>> you
>> >>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24

> MB?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> By seeing the size of the Inbox.dbx file in Windows Explorer.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> > 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx
>> >> files
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>> run
>> >>>>>> it
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I did try OE Extract and it doesn't do anything and provides no
>> >>>>> instructions, so I guess one of the nonfreeware apps is next.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "dadiOH" <someone@fuggetit.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>> news:eGJ5QW$jIHA.4120@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >>>>>> Larry wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Strange things going on (see below), but I think the problem may

> be
>> >>>>>>> solvable.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 1. The Inbox, prior to the problem, would have been around 80 or

> 90
>> >>>>>>> MB. As I said, my procedure is to let it build up for a few
>> >>>>>>> weeks
>> >>>>>>> and then move a lot of it into a custom folder. But after the
>> >>>>>>> problem occurred, the Inbox was 130 KB. After I received e-mails
>> >>>>>>> since this morning, it went up to about 400 KB.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 2. But here's the strange thing: just now I looked again, and

> the
>> >>>>>>> only Inbox.dbx in the OE folder has 1.24 MB!!! So somehow it's
>> >>>>>>> returned.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me. How
>> >>>>>> did
>> >>>>>> you
>> >>>>>> determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was 1.24

> MB?
>> >>>>>> ________________
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 3. Yet the Inbox in the OE application is still just the e-mails
>> >>>>>>> received since this morning.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Because it is screwed up. That is, whatever methodology used to
>> >>>>>> determine messages start/end and/or count is wrong. Like a file

> that
>> >>>>>> has its EOF in the wrong place/
>> >>>>>> __________________
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This is what I'd do...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 1. Save a copy of Inbox.dbx somewhere
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx
>> >>>>>> files
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>> run it
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 3. If it is successful in getting your messages, save them as
>> >>>>>> MAIL

> (
>> >>>>>> i.e., *.eml - separate, discrete messages) in a folder on your
>> >>>>>> desktop.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> If not successful, forget what follows.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 4. Delete Inbox.dbx using Explorer
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 5. Open OE and display its Inbox - which should now be empty
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 6. Select all the recovered email messages in your temporary

> desktop
>> >>>>>> folder and drag them to the OE pane where they would normally be
>> >>>>>> displayed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 7. Close OE
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> dadiOH

>>
>>

>
 
P

PA Bear [MS MVP]

[I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]

While "Automatically compact messages in the background" is removed in a
fully updated OE6 running in WinXP SP2 (only), Windows will automatically
compact all OE folders every 100 times you close OE *if* you haven't done a
manual compact in the meantime. [The CompactCount in the Registry is
automatically reset to 0 (zero) when you compact manually.]

That being said:

1. IMHO, compacting every 100 closings is not frequent enough for heavy
users of OE. Such users are putting their message store at risk if and when
Automatic Compacting takes place.

2. Answering No at the Automatic Compacting prompt does *not* cancel the
operation! It only means that Window will not notify you that Automatic
Compacting is about to take place every time after that. Never try to shut
down your machine or close OE via Task Manager when an automatic or manual
compacting is taking place.

3. Despite repeated requests from MVPs, there still is no MS documentation
whatsoever of the Automatic Compacting functionality.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/


Bill in Co. wrote:
> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the autocompacting
> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).

<snip>
 
G

Gary S. Terhune

Yes, it's possible. I prefer to read email in the Inbox and then sort rather
than presort (which means you potentially have to deal with several folders
just to read the email that came in.)

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message
news:pokuu39s0ck4g9l18v5fj0c39ocbdcd206@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:51:43 -0400, "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net>
> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>>> I just do it daily.

>>
>>Wow. I just never thought of OE as being so vulnerable that this kind of
>>continual attention and maintenance was required to avoid disasters.
>>
>>I'll certainly have to do that OE backup regularly.

>
> Why don't you just set up a bunch of filters so that incoming messages
> are automatically sorted as to author or type and redirected into
> their own respective mailboxes, eg Family / Friends / Forums /
> Publications / Your_ISP / Junk / Spam?
>
> Is this even possible in OE?
>
> - Franc Zabkar
> --
> Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
 
B

Bill in Co.

PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]


Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.

> While "Automatically compact messages in the background" is removed in a
> fully updated OE6 running in WinXP SP2 (only), Windows will automatically
> compact all OE folders every 100 times you close OE *if* you haven't done
> a
> manual compact in the meantime. [The CompactCount in the Registry is
> automatically reset to 0 (zero) when you compact manually.]
>
> That being said:
>
> 1. IMHO, compacting every 100 closings is not frequent enough for heavy
> users of OE. Such users are putting their message store at risk if and
> when
> Automatic Compacting takes place.
>
> 2. Answering No at the Automatic Compacting prompt does *not* cancel the
> operation! It only means that Window will not notify you that Automatic
> Compacting is about to take place every time after that. Never try to
> shut
> down your machine or close OE via Task Manager when an automatic or manual
> compacting is taking place.
>
> 3. Despite repeated requests from MVPs, there still is no MS documentation
> whatsoever of the Automatic Compacting functionality.
> --


I'm not sure what you mean by that. It just automatically compacts the
dbx database store (a few seconds after opening OE) and significantly
reduces its size that's its functionality, isn't it? The automatic
feature is nice in that you don't have to think about it. The disavantage
is, as has been mentioned: if the computer crashes or hangs up while the
compaction is running (much more likely if you're multitasking and doing
other things, and not waiting for the compaction to run), it can corrupt the
database file. With the automatic feature engaged, there are more chances
for that happening.


> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>
>
> Bill in Co. wrote:
>> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
>> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the autocompacting
>> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).

> <snip>
 
P

PA Bear [MS MVP]

>> 3. Despite repeated requests from MVPs, there still is no MS
>> documentation
>> whatsoever of the Automatic Compacting functionality.

>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that


See if you can find any reference to Automatic Compacting in OE on any
microsoft.com page (e.g., KB article OE-specific page).


Bill in Co. wrote:
> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]

>
> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.
>
>> While "Automatically compact messages in the background" is removed in a
>> fully updated OE6 running in WinXP SP2 (only), Windows will automatically
>> compact all OE folders every 100 times you close OE *if* you haven't done
>> a
>> manual compact in the meantime. [The CompactCount in the Registry is
>> automatically reset to 0 (zero) when you compact manually.]
>>
>> That being said:
>>
>> 1. IMHO, compacting every 100 closings is not frequent enough for heavy
>> users of OE. Such users are putting their message store at risk if and
>> when
>> Automatic Compacting takes place.
>>
>> 2. Answering No at the Automatic Compacting prompt does *not* cancel the
>> operation! It only means that Window will not notify you that Automatic
>> Compacting is about to take place every time after that. Never try to
>> shut
>> down your machine or close OE via Task Manager when an automatic or
>> manual
>> compacting is taking place.
>>
>> 3. Despite repeated requests from MVPs, there still is no MS
>> documentation
>> whatsoever of the Automatic Compacting functionality.
>> --

>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that. It just automatically compacts the
> dbx database store (a few seconds after opening OE) and significantly
> reduces its size that's its functionality, isn't it? The automatic
> feature is nice in that you don't have to think about it. The
> disavantage
> is, as has been mentioned: if the computer crashes or hangs up while the
> compaction is running (much more likely if you're multitasking and doing
> other things, and not waiting for the compaction to run), it can corrupt
> the
> database file. With the automatic feature engaged, there are more
> chances
> for that happening.
>
>
>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>
>>
>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>> And you pretty much HAVE to remember to do it, if you don't have that
>>> background compacting option turned on (and ever since the
>>> autocompacting
>>> feature was removed - at least in WinXP SP2).

>> <snip>
 
P

PCR

Larry wrote:
|> Sounds like you got major corruption during the lockup/bad shutdown.
|
| Yes, the computer froze, I restarted by pressing the external restart
| button on the tower, and after that is when the Inbox contents were
| missing.
|
|> Did you check for *.chk files as Franc suggested?
|
| I don't see a Franc in this thread, and don't remember anything about
| .chk files.

I see Zabcar's post below. If auto-Scandisk ran during the boot after
your crash, it may have put File.chk files in the C: directory. Open
those in Notepad for anything readable.

Other than that, one of these may recover your Input.dbx file. But the
longer you use the computer, the less likely you will get a deleted file
back. After Delete, the space occupied by the file can freely be used by
the system. As soon as something overwrites it, the file is truly gone.
Also, running a Defrag (but not a Scandisk) appears to make them truly
disappear.

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Kaus/homepage.htm
Recover For All
http://hccweb1.bai.ne.jp/~hcj58401/ Undelete
http://www.briggsoft.com/dsnoop.htm DSnoop Undelete
http://www.pcinspector.de/file_recovery/uk/welcome.htm Undelete
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/restoration.html Restoration
http://aumha.org/downloads/restoration.exe Also Restoration

The one I use is Restoration. It's showing me old stuff in my store
right now. Some of them don't have their full name or the file type
..dbx, but seem recognisable.

| But from what you say, it sounds as though the e-mails are basically
| lost. It's not a terrible disaster.

I've lost stuff too, but I think it was from other causes. I suspect I
wiped out an Inbox once by a misapplied message rule meant to delete
older messages from this newsgroup only. Also, I may have hit the delete
key & wiped out a whole newsgroup. Finally, I intentionally deleted what
I thought was an empty .dbx-- but it was just my View menu settings at
fault! Still, it is good to do as the others have said to avoid true
corruption.

| Larry
|
|
|
| "MEB" <meb@not here@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:eG7RcSXkIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
|>
|> "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
|> news:%235VtCHXkIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
|> | Hi, sorry I didn't get back sooner.
|> |
|> | I downloaded OE Reader as recommended, browsed to the Inbox.dbx
|> | file (which I had renamed XXX.dbx and placed on the Desktop), and
|> | opened it. Message said:
|> |
|> | "File does not contain any message."
|> |
|> | Yet the file's size is 1.24 MB.
|> |
|> | Go figure.
|> |
|> | Larry
|> |
|>
|> Sounds like you got major corruption during the lockup/bad shutdown.
|>
|> Did you check for *.chk files as Franc suggested?
|>
|> You can try to open that file [or others you might find] with a code
|> capable editor or hex editor and maybe recover some of the text {a
|> tedious task}.
|>
|> Of course, from now on, follow the normal procedure of moving from
|> the inbox to some other folder, and exporting the most important to
|> text or eml files.
|>
|> BTW: 98SE doesn't crash all that often if everything is setup
|> properly, so you might want to diagnose WHY your system seems to
|> crash alot.
|>
|> --
|> MEB http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
|> --
|> _________
|>
|>
|> |
|> |
|> |
|> | "bobster" <fauxie@bogus.net> wrote in message
|> | news:uyN57AIkIHA.4664@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
|> | > Try this. It's the successor to MiTec OE view. I use it and it
|> | > works fine for me.
|> | >
|> | > http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dbxviewer.html
|> | >
|> | > "Larry" <larry328NOSPAM@att.net> wrote in message
|> | > news:erUy0yAkIHA.6032@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
|> | > > I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me.
|> | > > How did
|> you
|> | > determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And when it was
|> | > 1.24 MB?
|> | >
|> | > By seeing the size of the Inbox.dbx file in Windows Explorer.
|> | >
|> | > > > 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from
|> | > > .dbx
| files
|> | and
|> | > run
|> | > > it
|> | >
|> | > I did try OE Extract and it doesn't do anything and provides no
|> | > instructions, so I guess one of the nonfreeware apps is next.
|> | >
|> | >
|> | > "dadiOH" <someone@fuggetit.com> wrote in message
|> | > news:eGJ5QW$jIHA.4120@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
|> | > > Larry wrote:
|> | > > > Strange things going on (see below), but I think the problem
|> | > > > may be solvable.
|> | > > >
|> | > > > 1. The Inbox, prior to the problem, would have been around
|> | > > > 80 or 90 MB. As I said, my procedure is to let it build up
|> | > > > for a few weeks and then move a lot of it into a custom
|> | > > > folder. But after the problem occurred, the Inbox was 130
|> | > > > KB. After I received e-mails since this morning, it went up
|> | > > > to about 400 KB.
|> | > > >
|> | > > > 2. But here's the strange thing: just now I looked again,
|> | > > > and the only Inbox.dbx in the OE folder has 1.24 MB!!! So
|> | > > > somehow it's returned.
|> | > >
|> | > > I haven't been following this thread but this confuses me.
|> | > > How did you determine the size of it when it was 400KB? And
|> | > > when it was 1.24 MB? ________________
|> | > >
|> | > > > 3. Yet the Inbox in the OE application is still just the
|> | > > > e-mails received since this morning.
|> | > >
|> | > > Because it is screwed up. That is, whatever methodology used
|> | > > to determine messages start/end and/or count is wrong. Like a
|> | > > file that has its EOF in the wrong place/
|> | > > __________________
|> | > >
|> | > > This is what I'd do...
|> | > >
|> | > > 1. Save a copy of Inbox.dbx somewhere
|> | > >
|> | > > 2. Get any of the many programs to extract messages from .dbx
|> | > > files and run it
|> | > >
|> | > > 3. If it is successful in getting your messages, save them as
|> | > > MAIL ( i.e., *.eml - separate, discrete messages) in a folder
|> | > > on your desktop.
|> | > >
|> | > > If not successful, forget what follows.
|> | > >
|> | > > 4. Delete Inbox.dbx using Explorer
|> | > >
|> | > > 5. Open OE and display its Inbox - which should now be empty
|> | > >
|> | > > 6. Select all the recovered email messages in your temporary
|> | > > desktop folder and drag them to the OE pane where they would
|> | > > normally be displayed.
|> | > >
|> | > > 7. Close OE
|> | > >
|> | > > dadiOH

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net
 
B

Bill in Co.

Bill in Co. wrote:
> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]

>
> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.


Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like me
:), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
June - no more XP.
 
G

Gary S. Terhune

What do you mean?

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bill in Co. wrote:
>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]

>>
>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.

>
> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like me
> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
> June - no more XP.
>
 
B

Bill in Co.

According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs after
June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold new,
anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter one, but
am sure on the former one).

Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
the home user)

Gary S. Terhune wrote:
> What do you mean?
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS-MVP Shell/User
> www.grystmill.com
>
> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
>>>
>>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.

>>
>> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like me
>> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
>> June - no more XP.
 
G

Gary S. Terhune

There's always EBay.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs
> after June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold
> new, anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter
> one, but am sure on the former one).
>
> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
> the home user)
>
> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
>> What do you mean?
>>
>> --
>> Gary S. Terhune
>> MS-MVP Shell/User
>> www.grystmill.com
>>
>> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
>>>>
>>>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.
>>>
>>> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like
>>> me
>>> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
>>> June - no more XP.

>
>
 
A

Adam

Does this mean that WinXP from
MSDN disks can no longer be installed after June 30?


"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs after
> June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold new,
> anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter one, but
> am sure on the former one).
>
> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
> the home user)
>
> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
> > What do you mean?
> >
> > --
> > Gary S. Terhune
> > MS-MVP Shell/User
> > www.grystmill.com
> >
> > "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >> Bill in Co. wrote:
> >>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> >>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
> >>>
> >>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.
> >>
> >> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like me
> >> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
> >> June - no more XP.

>
>
 
G

Gary S. Terhune

Not that I know of.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Adam" <adam@no_thanks.com> wrote in message
news:H_rJj.820$GO4.485@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net...
> Does this mean that WinXP from
> MSDN disks can no longer be installed after June 30?
>
>
> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs
>> after
>> June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold new,
>> anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter one,
>> but
>> am sure on the former one).
>>
>> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
>> the home user)
>>
>> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
>> > What do you mean?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gary S. Terhune
>> > MS-MVP Shell/User
>> > www.grystmill.com
>> >
>> > "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> > news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> >> Bill in Co. wrote:
>> >>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>> >>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
>> >>>
>> >>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More
>> >>> below.
>> >>
>> >> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like
>> >> me
>> >> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
>> >> June - no more XP.

>>
>>

>
 
P

PA Bear [MS MVP]

NO!

Adam wrote:
> Does this mean that WinXP from
> MSDN disks can no longer be installed after June 30?
>
>
> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs
>> after June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold
>> new, anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter
>> one, but am sure on the former one).
>>
>> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
>> the home user)
>>
>> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
>>> What do you mean?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary S. Terhune
>>> MS-MVP Shell/User
>>> www.grystmill.com
>>>
>>> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>> news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>>>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
>>>>>
>>>>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.
>>>>
>>>> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like
>>>> me
>>>> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
>>>> June - no more XP.
 
A

Adam

Would someone please elaborate? What exactly is
happening (in relation to WinXP) after June 30?


"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:#AFgKUolIHA.5368@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> NO!
>
> Adam wrote:
> > Does this mean that WinXP from
> > MSDN disks can no longer be installed after June 30?
> >
> >
> > "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs
> >> after June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold
> >> new, anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this latter
> >> one, but am sure on the former one).
> >>
> >> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically (for
> >> the home user)
> >>
> >> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
> >>> What do you mean?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Gary S. Terhune
> >>> MS-MVP Shell/User
> >>> www.grystmill.com
> >>>
> >>> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >>>> Bill in Co. wrote:
> >>>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
> >>>>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More below.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE, like
> >>>> me
> >>>> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out. After
> >>>> June - no more XP.

>
 
B

Bill in Co.

OEM's (like Dell, Gateway, HP, etc) will not be allowed to install WinXP on
their new computers anymore (due to Vista taking over).

And actually, at this point in time, you'd have a hard time getting WinXP
installed with any of those guys above, except Dell (and then only for a few
models).

As for retail sales of WinXP in the stores after that date, I *think* those
will be replaced with Vista, too, on or after that date, but I'm not
positive on this.

If someone can find the article, that would help (I'm on dialup and it would
take me awhile to locate it again)

Adam wrote:
> Would someone please elaborate? What exactly is
> happening (in relation to WinXP) after June 30?
>
>
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:#AFgKUolIHA.5368@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> NO!
>>
>> Adam wrote:
>>> Does this mean that WinXP from
>>> MSDN disks can no longer be installed after June 30?
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Opi6z7dlIHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> According to MS, WinXP will not be allowed to be installed on any OEMs
>>>> after June (June 30, as I recall). And it may not be able to be sold
>>>> new, anymore, in the stores after that date (not positive on this
>>>> latter
>>>> one, but am sure on the former one).
>>>>
>>>> Then your choices after that date will be Vista, or Linux, basically
>>>> (for
>>>> the home user)
>>>>
>>>> Gary S. Terhune wrote:
>>>>> What do you mean?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gary S. Terhune
>>>>> MS-MVP Shell/User
>>>>> www.grystmill.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:%23vh34gclIHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>>>>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
>>>>>>>> [I note that Bill is running WinXP SP2 now, not Win98.]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mostly now, but I still have my Win98SE up and running. More
>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey PCR, if you're considering WinXP (i.e., in addition to W98SE,
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> :), better not wait too much longer, as time is running out.
>>>>>> After
>>>>>> June - no more XP.
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
0
Views
124
TaylorJBrownlow
T
D
Replies
0
Views
881
Dona Sarkar and Brandon LeBlanc
D
Back
Top Bottom