How to legally run Vista-32/Vista-64 on PC?

[Frank]

Alias wrote:

> wwoods wrote:
>
>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>
>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two computers
>>> with the same key.
>>
>>
>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>
>>
>
> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the balls to
> take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know if the EULA
> is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part of Microsoft. They
> would have to take someone to court in each and every country where
> Microsoft products are sold.
>
> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces people
> like you?
>
> Alias

hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and thief!...LOL!

 

[Lisa]

As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both the 32bit
and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
because you only paid for one license.

"Mark Conrad" <noneof@urbusiness.invalid> wrote in message
news:noneof-226906.20265801092008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone here know for certain whether the MS EULA
> will allow me to legally use both Vista-32 and Vista-64
> on the same computer?
>
> I do not know where to contact someone at MS to ask this,
> so thought I would try this NG.
>
> Computer is presently running Vista-32.
>
> What I really want to do is _alternately_ run the
> two different OSs at different times, possibly even on
> the same day. I have a reason for doing it this way.
>
> Seems to me it should be legal, because it is the
> same machine with the same operator, me.
>
> Tough question think I really should ask someone at
> Microsoft, but do not know where to ask.
>
> Thanks all for your time reading this,
>
> Mark-

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> wwoods wrote:
>>
>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two computers
>>>> with the same key.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the balls
>> to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know if the
>> EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part of
>> Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and every
>> country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>
>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces people
>> like you?
>>
>> Alias
>
> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and thief!...LOL!

Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require you
to think, something you obviously have problems with as is evidenced by
your moronic posts.

Alias

 

[Alias]

Lisa wrote:
>
> As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
> being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
> bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both the
> 32bit
> and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
> because you only paid for one license.

Correction: you "may" only have one version installed at a time if you
want to abide by the unconscionable EULA which has never been contested
in court and it not therefore a legal document that can be enforced.

Alias
>
> "Mark Conrad" <noneof@urbusiness.invalid> wrote in message
> news:noneof-226906.20265801092008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone here know for certain whether the MS EULA
>> will allow me to legally use both Vista-32 and Vista-64
>> on the same computer?
>>
>> I do not know where to contact someone at MS to ask this,
>> so thought I would try this NG.
>>
>> Computer is presently running Vista-32.
>>
>> What I really want to do is _alternately_ run the
>> two different OSs at different times, possibly even on
>> the same day. I have a reason for doing it this way.
>>
>> Seems to me it should be legal, because it is the
>> same machine with the same operator, me.
>>
>> Tough question think I really should ask someone at
>> Microsoft, but do not know where to ask.
>>
>> Thanks all for your time reading this,
>>
>> Mark-
>

 

[fb]

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two computers
>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the balls
>>> to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know if the
>>> EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part of
>>> Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and every
>>> country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>
>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces people
>>> like you?
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>> thief!...LOL!
>
>
> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?

I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.

> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require you
> to think, something you obviously have problems with as is evidenced by
> your moronic posts.

Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it for you.
Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.

 

[fb]

Alias wrote:

> Lisa wrote:
>
>>
>> As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
>> being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
>> bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both the
>> 32bit
>> and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
>> because you only paid for one license.
>
>
> Correction: you "may" only have one version installed at a time if you
> want to abide by the unconscionable EULA which has never been contested
> in court and it not therefore a legal document that can be enforced.
>

Correction: if you are a lying thief like alias is pray the authorities
don't catch you.

> Alias
>
>>
>> "Mark Conrad" <noneof@urbusiness.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:noneof-226906.20265801092008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Does anyone here know for certain whether the MS EULA
>>> will allow me to legally use both Vista-32 and Vista-64
>>> on the same computer?
>>>
>>> I do not know where to contact someone at MS to ask this,
>>> so thought I would try this NG.
>>>
>>> Computer is presently running Vista-32.
>>>
>>> What I really want to do is _alternately_ run the
>>> two different OSs at different times, possibly even on
>>> the same day. I have a reason for doing it this way.
>>>
>>> Seems to me it should be legal, because it is the
>>> same machine with the same operator, me.
>>>
>>> Tough question think I really should ask someone at
>>> Microsoft, but do not know where to ask.
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your time reading this,
>>>
>>> Mark-
>>
>>

 

[Alias]

fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two computers
>>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the
>>>> balls to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know
>>>> if the EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part of
>>>> Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and
>>>> every country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces people
>>>> like you?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>>> thief!...LOL!
>>
>>
>> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
>
> I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.

Not the content. You have a problem with the forest due to the trees.

>
>> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require
>> you to think, something you obviously have problems with as is
>> evidenced by your moronic posts.
>
> Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it for you.
> Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.

LOL! I understood your drivel perfectly and that's what it is, drivel.

Alias

 

[Alias]

fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Lisa wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
>>> being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
>>> bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both
>>> the 32bit
>>> and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
>>> because you only paid for one license.
>>
>>
>> Correction: you "may" only have one version installed at a time if you
>> want to abide by the unconscionable EULA which has never been
>> contested in court and it not therefore a legal document that can be
>> enforced.
>>
>
> Correction: if you are a lying thief like alias is pray the authorities
> don't catch you.

Once again, Frank hurls an ad hominem and ignores content. Everyone act
surprised.

I pray that MS grows the balls to take *anyone* to court for violating
their unconscionable EULA but they won't because they know they would
lose big time.

Alias
>
>> Alias
>>
>>>
>>> "Mark Conrad" <noneof@urbusiness.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:noneof-226906.20265801092008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone here know for certain whether the MS EULA
>>>> will allow me to legally use both Vista-32 and Vista-64
>>>> on the same computer?
>>>>
>>>> I do not know where to contact someone at MS to ask this,
>>>> so thought I would try this NG.
>>>>
>>>> Computer is presently running Vista-32.
>>>>
>>>> What I really want to do is _alternately_ run the
>>>> two different OSs at different times, possibly even on
>>>> the same day. I have a reason for doing it this way.
>>>>
>>>> Seems to me it should be legal, because it is the
>>>> same machine with the same operator, me.
>>>>
>>>> Tough question think I really should ask someone at
>>>> Microsoft, but do not know where to ask.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all for your time reading this,
>>>>
>>>> Mark-
>>>
>>>

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:

> fb wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>>
>>>> The end user license agreement (EULA) only allows you to run one
>>>> version of the operating system at a time. You may not dual boot
>>>> both operating systems.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, Microsoft just loves to tell you how you *can't* use their
>>> software.
>>
>>
>> I bet that really irritates a known and admitted thief like you.
>
>
> Not at all.

Liar!

Why should it?

You're a lying thief!

I don't think it's quite stupid of Microsoft
> except, of course, when it comes to lamers like you who when MS says
> "jump", you ask, "how high?"

Translation: alias is too broke to afford Vista, the very best OS
available today.
>
>>
>> Open Source, OTOH, tell you what you *can* do with your
>>
>>> software.
>>
>>
>> Nothing is the correct answer.
>
>
> Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong answer.

Liar!
>
>>
>> Microsoft's days are numbered.
>>
>> hehehe...they'll out live you and piss on your grave!
>
>
> Cloud computing, Google's new web browser. Can you connect the dots or
> are you too busy activating and becoming genuine with your Windows
> installs?

hehehe...again you're delusional. Face it sheep-fukker, you are in a
very small minority...you are a real fringe person.
>
>>
>> You better start learning Open
>>
>>> Source, Carey, although there is no MVP status to gotten, sorry.
>>
>>
>> "to gotten"...improper English but what can you expect from a GED?...LOL!
>
>
> Um, that was a typo and I meant to type "to be gotten", of course. Nice
> try, lamer, but no cigar (again).

Lamer? You typed it *lamer*, not me.
>
> The fact that you lie,

Liar!

over and over again, about my education only
> discredits you more than you already are if, indeed, that's possible.

Oh? That GED is a wonderful thing, right?...LOL!
Get lost troll or stick around so you can keep dancing for me.

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:

> fb wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Lisa wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
>>>> being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
>>>> bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both
>>>> the 32bit
>>>> and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
>>>> because you only paid for one license.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Correction: you "may" only have one version installed at a time if
>>> you want to abide by the unconscionable EULA which has never been
>>> contested in court and it not therefore a legal document that can be
>>> enforced.
>>>
>>
>> Correction: if you are a lying thief like alias is pray the
>> authorities don't catch you.
>
>
> Once again, Frank hurls an ad hominem and ignores content. Everyone act
> surprised.

Keep dancing...it's entertaining!
>
> I pray that MS grows the balls to take *anyone* to court for violating
> their unconscionable EULA but they won't because they know they would
> lose big time.

Pray you're not the one!...LOL!

 

[Lisa]

It's per copy per device, one at a time. That's all that needs to be read.
You purchase another license you put it in any machine you want. It's legal.



"Alias" <iamalias@gmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message
news:g9joet$na9$3@aioe.org...
> Lisa wrote:
>>
>> As long as you pay for each license you can, provided the license isn't
>> being used at the same time on a different computer. But let's say you
>> bought the retail version of Vista Ultimate, which comes with both the
>> 32bit
>> and 64bit versions, you can only have one version installed at a time
>> because you only paid for one license.
>
> Correction: you "may" only have one version installed at a time if you
> want to abide by the unconscionable EULA which has never been contested in
> court and it not therefore a legal document that can be enforced.
>
> Alias
>>
>> "Mark Conrad" <noneof@urbusiness.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:noneof-226906.20265801092008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Does anyone here know for certain whether the MS EULA
>>> will allow me to legally use both Vista-32 and Vista-64
>>> on the same computer?
>>>
>>> I do not know where to contact someone at MS to ask this,
>>> so thought I would try this NG.
>>>
>>> Computer is presently running Vista-32.
>>>
>>> What I really want to do is _alternately_ run the
>>> two different OSs at different times, possibly even on
>>> the same day. I have a reason for doing it this way.
>>>
>>> Seems to me it should be legal, because it is the
>>> same machine with the same operator, me.
>>>
>>> Tough question think I really should ask someone at
>>> Microsoft, but do not know where to ask.
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your time reading this,
>>>
>>> Mark-
>>

 

[fb]

Alias wrote:
> fb wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two
>>>>>>> computers
>>>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the
>>>>> balls to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know
>>>>> if the EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part
>>>>> of Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and
>>>>> every country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces
>>>>> people like you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>>>> thief!...LOL!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
>>
>>
>> I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.
>
>
> Not the content. You have a problem with the forest due to the trees.

You must have a suite on the good ship *Denial*!
>
>>
>>> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require
>>> you to think, something you obviously have problems with as is
>>> evidenced by your moronic posts.
>>
>>
>> Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it for
>> you.
>> Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.
>
>
> LOL! I understood your drivel perfectly and that's what it is, drivel.

You have an ego, arrogance problem that has ruined your life.
Face it sheep-fukker, you are a pathetic lying loser.
Get lost...or stick around and keep dancing.

 

[Frank's Keeper]

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:17:02 -0700, fb <frank@noscm.org> wrote:

>Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two computers
>>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the balls
>>>> to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know if the
>>>> EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part of
>>>> Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and every
>>>> country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces people
>>>> like you?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>>> thief!...LOL!
>>
>>
>> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
>
>I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.
>
>> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require you
>> to think, something you obviously have problems with as is evidenced by
>> your moronic posts.
>
>Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it for you.
>Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.

How idiotic can Frank get when he always has one foot in the gutter,
resorts to endless name calling, deliberate lying, forging posts and
shouting obscenities daily while pretending he's the Gate Keeper and
official Microsoft apologist.

Face facts Frank, you're nothing but a clueless degenerate old senile
stupid jackass everybody laughs at.

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> fb wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The end user license agreement (EULA) only allows you to run one
>>>>> version of the operating system at a time. You may not dual boot
>>>>> both operating systems.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep, Microsoft just loves to tell you how you *can't* use their
>>>> software.
>>>
>>>
>>> I bet that really irritates a known and admitted thief like you.
>>
>>
>> Not at all.
>
> Liar!

Wrong again, Frank.

>
> Why should it?
>
> You're a lying thief!

Wrong again, Frank.

>
> I don't think it's quite stupid of Microsoft
>> except, of course, when it comes to lamers like you who when MS says
>> "jump", you ask, "how high?"
>
> Translation: alias is too broke to afford Vista, the very best OS
> available today.

Wrong again, Frank.

>>
>>>
>>> Open Source, OTOH, tell you what you *can* do with your
>>>
>>>> software.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing is the correct answer.
>>
>>
>> Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong answer.
>
> Liar!

Wrong again, Frank.

>>
>>>
>>> Microsoft's days are numbered.
>>>
>>> hehehe...they'll out live you and piss on your grave!
>>
>>
>> Cloud computing, Google's new web browser. Can you connect the dots or
>> are you too busy activating and becoming genuine with your Windows
>> installs?
>
> hehehe...again you're delusional. Face it sheep-fukker, you are in a
> very small minority...you are a real fringe person.
>>
>>>
>>> You better start learning Open
>>>
>>>> Source, Carey, although there is no MVP status to gotten, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>> "to gotten"...improper English but what can you expect from a
>>> GED?...LOL!
>>
>>
>> Um, that was a typo and I meant to type "to be gotten", of course.
>> Nice try, lamer, but no cigar (again).
>
> Lamer? You typed it *lamer*, not me.

Mistyped it, commonly known as a "typo".

>>
>> The fact that you lie,
>
> Liar!

Wrong again, Frank.

>
> over and over again, about my education only
>> discredits you more than you already are if, indeed, that's possible.
>
> Oh? That GED is a wonderful thing, right?...LOL!

I wouldn't know. I have a bonafide high school diploma.

> Get lost troll or stick around so you can keep dancing for me.

No one dances for you, Frank, except when you're looking in the mirror.

Alias

 

[Alias]

fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> fb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The end user license agreement (EULA) only allows you to run one
>>>>>>> version of the operating system at a time. You may not dual boot
>>>>>>> both operating systems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep, Microsoft just loves to tell you how you *can't* use their
>>>>>> software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet that really irritates a known and admitted thief like you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> Liar!
>>
>>
>> Wrong again, Frank.
>>
>>>
>>> Why should it?
>>>
>>> You're a lying thief!
>>
>>
>> Wrong again, Frank.
>>
>>>
>>> I don't think it's quite stupid of Microsoft
>>>
>>>> except, of course, when it comes to lamers like you who when MS says
>>>> "jump", you ask, "how high?"
>>>
>>>
>>> Translation: alias is too broke to afford Vista, the very best OS
>>> available today.
>>
>>
>> Wrong again, Frank.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source, OTOH, tell you what you *can* do with your
>>>>>
>>>>>> software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing is the correct answer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong answer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Liar!
>>
>>
>> Wrong again, Frank.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft's days are numbered.
>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...they'll out live you and piss on your grave!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cloud computing, Google's new web browser. Can you connect the dots
>>>> or are you too busy activating and becoming genuine with your
>>>> Windows installs?
>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...again you're delusional. Face it sheep-fukker, you are in a
>>> very small minority...you are a real fringe person.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You better start learning Open
>>>>>
>>>>>> Source, Carey, although there is no MVP status to gotten, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "to gotten"...improper English but what can you expect from a
>>>>> GED?...LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um, that was a typo and I meant to type "to be gotten", of course.
>>>> Nice try, lamer, but no cigar (again).
>>>
>>>
>>> Lamer? You typed it *lamer*, not me.
>>
>>
>> Mistyped it, commonly known as a "typo".
>>
>>>>
>>>> The fact that you lie,
>>>
>>>
>>> Liar!
>>
>>
>> Wrong again, Frank.
>
> No, I'm right!
>>
>>>
>>> over and over again, about my education only
>>>
>>>> discredits you more than you already are if, indeed, that's possible.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh? That GED is a wonderful thing, right?...LOL!
>>
>>
>> I wouldn't know. I have a bonafide high school diploma.
>
> Liar!
>>
>>> Get lost troll or stick around so you can keep dancing for me.
>>
>>
>> No one dances for you, Frank, except when you're looking in the mirror.
>
> hehehe...thanks for proving my point! Keep dancing...you might make it
> to YouTube!...LOL!

Wrong again, Frank.

Alias

 

[Frank]

Ringmaster, Frank's Ass Licker wrote:

<---raging ranting incoherent diatribe deleted as a public service-->

hehehe...what's wrong mr drunken lying PIG, got your panties all in a
bunch?...LOL!

 

[Alias]

fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> fb wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two
>>>>>>>> computers
>>>>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>>>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the
>>>>>> balls to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will know
>>>>>> if the EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the part
>>>>>> of Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in each and
>>>>>> every country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces
>>>>>> people like you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>>>>> thief!...LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
>>>
>>>
>>> I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.
>>
>>
>> Not the content. You have a problem with the forest due to the trees.
>
> You must have a suite on the good ship *Denial*!
>>
>>>
>>>> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would require
>>>> you to think, something you obviously have problems with as is
>>>> evidenced by your moronic posts.
>>>
>>>
>>> Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it for
>>> you.
>>> Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.
>>
>>
>> LOL! I understood your drivel perfectly and that's what it is, drivel.
>
> You have an ego, arrogance problem that has ruined your life.
> Face it sheep-fukker, you are a pathetic lying loser.
> Get lost...or stick around and keep dancing.
>

This from Mr Back Pedal Break Dancer. You'll never learn, Frank.

Copy and paste one of your standard low life replies below:

 

[fb]

Alias wrote:
> fb wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> fb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wwoods wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mr GRiM826333 Wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have one copy of Vista Home Premium 32-bit running on two
>>>>>>>>> computers
>>>>>>>>> with the same key.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, in other words, youre a thief ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Um, violating a unconscionable EULA is, at most, a civil offense.
>>>>>>> Stealing is a criminal offense. If and when Microsoft grows the
>>>>>>> balls to take someone to court for violating an EULA, we will
>>>>>>> know if the EULA is, indeed, legal or a monopolistic abuse on the
>>>>>>> part of Microsoft. They would have to take someone to court in
>>>>>>> each and every country where Microsoft products are sold.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course, why should they when their FUD obviously convinces
>>>>>>> people like you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hehehe...nice dance coming from a known and admitted liar and
>>>>>> thief!...LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Care to comment on content or only spew your usual bluster and lies?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did. You are a known and admitted liar and thief.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not the content. You have a problem with the forest due to the trees.
>>
>>
>> You must have a suite on the good ship *Denial*!
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Problem is you *can't* comment on content because that would
>>>>> require you to think, something you obviously have problems with as
>>>>> is evidenced by your moronic posts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Print out your post and take it to an adult and have them read it
>>>> for you.
>>>> Ask questions, take notes and report back to me when you're finished.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL! I understood your drivel perfectly and that's what it is, drivel.
>>
>>
>> You have an ego, arrogance problem that has ruined your life.
>> Face it sheep-fukker, you are a pathetic lying loser.
>> Get lost...or stick around and keep dancing.
>>
>
> This from Mr Back Pedal Break Dancer.

That would be you sheep-fukker.

You'll never learn, Frank.

I already know and it's you who is stupid, ignorant and ego driven.

>
> Copy and paste one of your standard low life replies below:

So why are you still dancing for me, huh?...LOL!
Loser!

 

[Mark Conrad]

In article <1ead0087d430482f7af6e38de1128400@nntp-gateway.com>,
SIW2 <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thought you were planning on dual booting.

First off, thanks for your post and links.

....and no, was not planning to dual boot, rather to
kick one version out completely, re-install the other
version from a low-level block-by-block image.

Works fine, but takes almost an hour to restore.



> Must stop using it as a trial by 30 days and either
> remove it completely from the system
> ( reinstall the 32bit and during the reinstall process
> format the partition the trial o/s is on )

Unfortunately for me, the reinstall is not an option,
because I do not have the smarts to round up all the
interconnected user files and links of the Dragon
speech-to-text program.

Installing just Vista OS and then retraining Dragon
would take a month, so restoring from an exact image
backup seems to be my only option.

That is how I am presently restoring my 32-bit Vista
whenever I accidentally mess it up.


The well trained medical Dragon works fine, I can get
100% raw accuracy on medical stuff like the following,
punctuation and all:

-------------------------------------------------------
X-Linked agammaglobulinemia (Bruton's agammaglobulinemia)
is a hereditary immunodeficiency disorder due to an
abnormality in the X chromosome and resulting in few or
no B lymphocytes and very low levels of antibodies.
-------------------------------------------------------



Can also get perfect recognition of long medical words:

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis

(affliction from breathing the fine silica
dust from an actively erupting volcano)

....although the hazard there is that occasionally I have
to go to a tongue-ologist to untie the knots in my tongue.

Mark-

 

[Gazill Yanaire]

Give it a rest

"Alias" <iamalias@gmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message
news:g9ja7p$n24$1@aioe.org...
> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>> The end user license agreement (EULA) only allows you to run one version
>> of the operating system at a time. You may not dual boot both operating
>> systems.
>>
>
> Yep, Microsoft just loves to tell you how you *can't* use their software.
> Open Source, OTOH, tell you what you *can* do with your software.
> Microsoft's days are numbered. You better start learning Open Source,
> Carey, although there is no MVP status to gotten, sorry.
>
> Alias

OTOH, Ubuntu, OpenSores operating systems are designed by geeks for geeks.
Especially if you can't get a date or you can't get laid. Running other
OpenSores software for FREE means you can't afford a REAL operating system
to do real work, so you have to settle for junk.

Microsoft will be around for a long time and Alias is just sore that his
precious Ubuntu is on less than 1% of the desktops. Imagine, a FREE product
that NOBODY wants. That burns Alias to the core. What a putz.