Antivirus

[webster72n]

Re: Antivirus >>> TO: WEBSTER72N

There is nothing wrong with 'Avast' and it is quite recommendable.
If you screw up your registry, it is your fault and noone else's.
Mike gave you instructions on how to fix your mistake and there's no need
whatsoever to 'suck up to him'. He simply has the knowledge.
And 'SGB' didn't look 'female' to me, therefore the assumption, with my
apologies.
Regardless whether you'll listen to it or not, my recommendation is to make
Avast work. To create one's own System CheckPoints doesn't present a problem
at all.
I should be the one laughing, but instead I'm enjoying a smooth working
machine.

Harry.

"There is always hope in tomorrow".


"SGB" <NoEmail@ThisAddress.com> wrote in message
news:Os$RiqGHJHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> I took me a while to post this reply, because I had to be able to type
> through all the tears of laughter after I read your posts.
>
> Harry, you are so sucking up to Mike and the icing on this cake is your
> sentence should read "She just may be able to figure it out by/for
herself.
>
> You are the one that advised me Avast was a good anti-virus program, but
you
> neglected to give me all the details in your first post. You mentioned
> nothing about System Restore until later in the thread.
>
> "Heather" <figgyd@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:eUduHk1FJHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> > To put this politely, don't ask Harry how to fix anything. He
> > specializes in breaking stuff. (G) IOW, he could quite conceivably
> > give you the wrong advice.
> >
> > HF
>
> I remember sometime ago, Heather stated something similar to the above. I
> should have kept it in mind.
>
> "If it were me, I would reinstall Avast completely, making sure it's
> registered and all." You go, Harry!
>
> Considering you are not qualified and ASSume wrongly, I would not place my
> trust in you, again. However, I take full responsibility for taking you
> seriously. You are way too funny.
>
> SGB
>
> "webster72n" <webster72n@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uOylpBEHJHA.1432@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > He just may be able to figure it out by/for himself.
> > If it were me, I would reinstall Avast completely, making sure it's
> > registered and all.
> > Then, if things shouldn't be right, uninstall it again, as you said.
> > But it's his decision to make, as you also said.
> > Now I must get ready for bed.
> > Nighty Night
>
>
>
>

 

[Arturo Seis]

Last I heard, Joan (and I don't need it anymore, having gone for the two
year three licence deal on NOD32, so haven't checked in months) is that
Grisoft had extended support for 7.5 until Dec 31st. That change was too
late, here, and anyway I'd never trust Grisoft again. I remember thinking,
myself, that 7.5 was about to end, and that 8.0 was no longer free, thanks
to the pop-up spam they sent. Others with less computer savvy than you and I
bought 8.0 before finding out that a free version was still available. And,
for chrissake, AVG 8.0 retail costs more than NOD32!

However, Avast! is not very good. For free it is better than nothing and
free or not it is better than Norton and McAfee, but it doesn't do
particularly well in tests that reflect the real world. It requires
responsible surfing and clicking too - but then they all do, don't they.

Arturo




Joan Archer wrote:
> Like you it's the one that's been on that box for ages and it still
> gets updated and as that machine is perhaps only turned on about once
> a week to keep it up to date, I have no need to change it.
> Johns XP has the free version of Avast, it was my machine and I had
> NOD32 on there but took it back when I got Vista as I still had
> nearly a year left, he can't have all the perks <g>
> Joan
>
>
> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:uHk#YP3FJHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Hi Joan, - something about 'if it ain't broke' I guess <g>
>>
>> But to be fair, I've nothing against Avast. It's just that I've
>> never had reason to use it. I know Alias always recommends it, and
>> probably justifiably so, but AVG (7.xx) had always done well on my
>> WinMe boxes and as I said elsewhere, I have no reason (yet) to pull
>> it.
>>
>> Mart
>>
>>
>>
>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:ubgTqK1FJHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> That's the version on my WinME machine as well Mart. )
>>> Joan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joan Archer
>>> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
>>> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>>>
>>> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:eq6LyMdFJHA.3744@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> AVG 7.5 is still running and regularly updating on my WinMe boxes,
>>>> without any nag screens. No sign though, for how much longer.
>>>>
>>>> Mart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "SGB" <NoEmail@ThisAddress.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:uGSVg1aFJHA.5484@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Being it is September 2008, what would be the best anti-virus
>>>>> program/version for Windows ME?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>> SGB

 

[Joan Archer]

Thanks Shane, I haven't bothered looking but as I said that machine is only
really turned on about once a week to keep it up to date so will keep an eye
out for when it finishes being updated and find another one for WinME. The
machine does get used occasionally by John when he wants to transfer photo's
from Photobucket to one of his forums, the guinea pig ones, so I do have to
make sure it works OK <g>
Hope your OK I'll give you a ring sometime soon for a chat )

--
Joan Archer
http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
http://lachsoft.com/photogallery

"Arturo Seis" <sixpencedearturo@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:u7mbLKUHJHA.2408@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Last I heard, Joan (and I don't need it anymore, having gone for the two
> year three licence deal on NOD32, so haven't checked in months) is that
> Grisoft had extended support for 7.5 until Dec 31st. That change was too
> late, here, and anyway I'd never trust Grisoft again. I remember thinking,
> myself, that 7.5 was about to end, and that 8.0 was no longer free, thanks
> to the pop-up spam they sent. Others with less computer savvy than you and
> I
> bought 8.0 before finding out that a free version was still available.
> And,
> for chrissake, AVG 8.0 retail costs more than NOD32!
>
> However, Avast! is not very good. For free it is better than nothing and
> free or not it is better than Norton and McAfee, but it doesn't do
> particularly well in tests that reflect the real world. It requires
> responsible surfing and clicking too - but then they all do, don't they.
>
> Arturo
>
>
>
>
> Joan Archer wrote:
>> Like you it's the one that's been on that box for ages and it still
>> gets updated and as that machine is perhaps only turned on about once
>> a week to keep it up to date, I have no need to change it.
>> Johns XP has the free version of Avast, it was my machine and I had
>> NOD32 on there but took it back when I got Vista as I still had
>> nearly a year left, he can't have all the perks <g>
>> Joan
>>
>>
>> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:uHk#YP3FJHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi Joan, - something about 'if it ain't broke' I guess <g>
>>>
>>> But to be fair, I've nothing against Avast. It's just that I've
>>> never had reason to use it. I know Alias always recommends it, and
>>> probably justifiably so, but AVG (7.xx) had always done well on my
>>> WinMe boxes and as I said elsewhere, I have no reason (yet) to pull
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Mart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ubgTqK1FJHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> That's the version on my WinME machine as well Mart. )
>>>> Joan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joan Archer
>>>> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
>>>> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>>>>
>>>> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>>>> news:eq6LyMdFJHA.3744@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> AVG 7.5 is still running and regularly updating on my WinMe boxes,
>>>>> without any nag screens. No sign though, for how much longer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mart
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "SGB" <NoEmail@ThisAddress.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uGSVg1aFJHA.5484@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Being it is September 2008, what would be the best anti-virus
>>>>>> program/version for Windows ME?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>> SGB
>
>

 

[Arturo Seis]

Joan Archer wrote:
> Thanks Shane, I haven't bothered looking but as I said that machine
> is only really turned on about once a week to keep it up to date so

I deleted it here (though not for the first time, much in the same way Bilbo
wished he was back in his comfy hobbit hole). I just wish I could remember
for once and for all that I *don't need Millennium any more!* Truth to tell
the main reason I reinstall it, when I do, is I did so much work on the Real
Mode I think I ought to keep it handy (though I have it on Memory Stick
anyway, so that argument falls flat). I do get to run the 9x NOD32, which
feels worth doing *because I can*...

> will keep an eye out for when it finishes being updated and find
> another one for WinME. The machine does get used occasionally by John
> when he wants to transfer photo's from Photobucket to one of his
> forums, the guinea pig ones, so I do have to make sure it works OK <g>
> Hope your OK I'll give you a ring sometime soon for a chat )
>

Catch you later!

>
> "Arturo Seis" <sixpencedearturo@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:u7mbLKUHJHA.2408@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Last I heard, Joan (and I don't need it anymore, having gone for the
>> two year three licence deal on NOD32, so haven't checked in months)
>> is that Grisoft had extended support for 7.5 until Dec 31st. That
>> change was too late, here, and anyway I'd never trust Grisoft again.
>> I remember thinking, myself, that 7.5 was about to end, and that 8.0
>> was no longer free, thanks to the pop-up spam they sent. Others with
>> less computer savvy than you and I
>> bought 8.0 before finding out that a free version was still
>> available. And,
>> for chrissake, AVG 8.0 retail costs more than NOD32!
>>
>> However, Avast! is not very good. For free it is better than nothing
>> and free or not it is better than Norton and McAfee, but it doesn't
>> do particularly well in tests that reflect the real world. It
>> requires responsible surfing and clicking too - but then they all
>> do, don't they. Arturo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Joan Archer wrote:
>>> Like you it's the one that's been on that box for ages and it still
>>> gets updated and as that machine is perhaps only turned on about
>>> once a week to keep it up to date, I have no need to change it.
>>> Johns XP has the free version of Avast, it was my machine and I had
>>> NOD32 on there but took it back when I got Vista as I still had
>>> nearly a year left, he can't have all the perks <g>
>>> Joan
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:uHk#YP3FJHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Hi Joan, - something about 'if it ain't broke' I guess <g>
>>>>
>>>> But to be fair, I've nothing against Avast. It's just that I've
>>>> never had reason to use it. I know Alias always recommends it, and
>>>> probably justifiably so, but AVG (7.xx) had always done well on my
>>>> WinMe boxes and as I said elsewhere, I have no reason (yet) to pull
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Mart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ubgTqK1FJHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>> That's the version on my WinME machine as well Mart. )
>>>>> Joan
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Joan Archer
>>>>> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
>>>>> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eq6LyMdFJHA.3744@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> AVG 7.5 is still running and regularly updating on my WinMe
>>>>>> boxes, without any nag screens. No sign though, for how much
>>>>>> longer. Mart
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "SGB" <NoEmail@ThisAddress.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:uGSVg1aFJHA.5484@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Being it is September 2008, what would be the best anti-virus
>>>>>>> program/version for Windows ME?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>> SGB