Invalid copy of win7

[Bill Yanaire]

"ray" wrote in message

news:81uq46F2hkU11@mid.individual.net...

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>>> past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a

>>>>>>>> message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this problem??

>>>>>>>> Suggestions??

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>

>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now

>>>>> and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've never

>>>>> had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby? Must be

>>>>> running on your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing to me what

>>>>> some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>

>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give

>>>> that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning

>>>> cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>

>>>

>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>

> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.



The only thing you grasp is Alias' hips when you do him from behind! Oops.

 

[Alias]

Bill Yanaire wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hpda57$mp8$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>> past

>>>>>>> few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a message

>>>>>>> popped

>>>>>>> up on the screen saying we may be running an invalid copy. This is

>>>>>>> pure BS. Anyone else run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>

>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>> constantly.

>>>>

>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now and

>>>> I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've never had to

>>>> 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby? Must be

>>>> running on

>>>> your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks

>>>> are

>>>> willing to put up with!

>>>

>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give that

>>> SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning cube.

>>> That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> I don't. I don't use that SHITTY Ubuntu. No need.

>

>

>



You sure bring it up a lot. What are you afraid of that motivates you to

lie?



--

Alias

 

[Trimble Bracegirdle]

Hold on a moment...!..The OP no_one@no_where.invalid said:

>>>"a message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an invalid

>>>copy.">>>>



Are you sure this was a Windows 7 Microsoft System Message ??

The Internet is full of sites sticking Pop Ups on screen to con us into

Buying

this or that Virus or Updated Checker.



My Win 7 has sometimes seemed to have "forgotten its registration" .

Do a Restart or just leave it for a bit..

MS is often trying to get us to do there Online Authentication thing ..

the message may just be a Nag...its only saying "MAY Be Running an Invalid

copy"

(\__/)

(='.'=)

(")_(") mouse

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>>> past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a

>>>>>>>> message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this problem??

>>>>>>>> Suggestions??

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>

>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now

>>>>> and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've never

>>>>> had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby? Must be

>>>>> running on your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing to me what

>>>>> some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>

>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give

>>>> that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning

>>>> cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>

>>>

>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>

> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.



Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here.

Got it ray-baby?

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 12:09 PM, Alias wrote:

> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hpda57$mp8$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>>> past

>>>>>>>> few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a message

>>>>>>>> popped

>>>>>>>> up on the screen saying we may be running an invalid copy. This is

>>>>>>>> pure BS. Anyone else run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>

>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now

>>>>> and

>>>>> I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've never

>>>>> had to

>>>>> 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby? Must be

>>>>> running on

>>>>> your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks

>>>>> are

>>>>> willing to put up with!

>>>>

>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give

>>>> that

>>>> SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning cube.

>>>> That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> I don't. I don't use that SHITTY Ubuntu. No need.

>>

>>

>>

>

> You sure bring it up a lot. What are you afraid of that motivates you to

> lie?

>

Oh the irony!

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>>>> past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a

>>>>>>>>> message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this

>>>>>>>>> problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now

>>>>>> and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've

>>>>>> never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby?

>>>>>> Must be running on your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing

>>>>>> to me what some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>>

>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give

>>>>> that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning

>>>>> cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>

>>>>

>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>>

>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>

> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got it

> ray-baby?



Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or shut

up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced one

example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.



BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for the

>>>>>>>>>> past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon a

>>>>>>>>>> message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this

>>>>>>>>>> problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years now

>>>>>>> and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell, I've

>>>>>>> never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie baby?

>>>>>>> Must be running on your own definitions again. Absolutely amazing

>>>>>>> to me what some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They give

>>>>>> that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the spinning

>>>>>> cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>>>

>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>

>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got it

>> ray-baby?

>

> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or shut

> up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced one

> example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.



Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

will let you connect to the Internet.

>

> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.



But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os.

Get lost ray, you have no business here.

 

[johnbee]

"Trimble Bracegirdle" wrote in message

news:hpdcr3$d3$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> Hold on a moment...!..The OP no_one@no_where.invalid said:

>>>>"a message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an invalid

>>>>copy.">>>>

>

> Are you sure this was a Windows 7 Microsoft System Message ??

> The Internet is full of sites sticking Pop Ups on screen to con us into

> Buying

> this or that Virus or Updated Checker.

>

> My Win 7 has sometimes seemed to have "forgotten its registration" .

> Do a Restart or just leave it for a bit..

> MS is often trying to get us to do there Online Authentication thing ..

> the message may just be a Nag...its only saying "MAY Be Running an Invalid

> copy"

> (\__/)

> (='.'=)

> (")_(") mouse

>



Yesterday my PC did the same as the original poster's. Microsoft have

stated that occasionally when the system 'thinks' your disk contents have

changed a lot it will require you to verify the copy you have and remake the

file it holds against which it does the check. Doesn't bother me, though it

is ridiculous paranoia. Microsoft was a bit of a cheating company, mucking

up other companies' software to plug its own, while Bill Gates was there,

but since he left it has gone a bit soft in the head. When you buy

software these days, instead of them asking you whether your machine is good

enough to run it, you have to ask them whether the software will work under

Windows 7. Even if it says so on the box, it sometimes doesn't.



However, the message can only be a surprise to people who did not install

and authenticate Windows 7 themselves.

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon

>>>>>>>>>>> a message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this

>>>>>>>>>>> problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie

>>>>>>>> baby? Must be running on your own definitions again. Absolutely

>>>>>>>> amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>>>>

>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>

>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got it

>>> ray-baby?

>>

>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced one

>> example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>

> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

> will let you connect to the Internet.



You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to the

internet - I post here via my electric personality.



>>

>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>

> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

> lost ray, you have no business here.



Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest of

the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an invalid!

 

[Bill Yanaire]

"ray" wrote in message

news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net...

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon

>>>>>>>>>>>> a message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie

>>>>>>>>> baby? Must be running on your own definitions again. Absolutely

>>>>>>>>> amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>>>>>

>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>

>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got it

>>>> ray-baby?

>>>

>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced one

>>> example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>

>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>

> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to the

> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>

>>>

>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>

>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>

> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest of

> the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an invalid!



What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece of

shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has been free

for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be on every

machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it: legally. Tell me

why is Linux still on less than one percent of the desktop machines out

there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it and people don't want it.

It is rejected as garbage by most.



Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they SUCK.

That's why. Oops.





>

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the afternoon

>>>>>>>>>>>> a message popped up on the screen saying we may be running an

>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run into this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your teeth

>>>>>>>>>> constantly.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that, billie

>>>>>>>>> baby? Must be running on your own definitions again. Absolutely

>>>>>>>>> amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up with!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and "spin".

>>>>>

>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>

>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got it

>>>> ray-baby?

>>>

>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced one

>>> example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>

>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>

> You've never come up with one example.



This is a very good example of your lies.

Oops!



Of course I can't connect to the

> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>

>>>

>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>

>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>

> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so!



Now that is the second example of your lying in one post!



The rest of

> the world knows differently.



They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux.



Glad you like working with an invalid!



Now comes the third lie in one post!

Oops!...LOL!

 

[Al Smith]

Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote:

> Al Smith wrote:

>> My copy of Windows 7 came with my Dell computer, and unless Dell is up

>> to shenanigans, it is perfectly legal. But I don't trust Microsoft.

>> It's that simple.

>

> If you don't trust Microsoft, you should switch to a different OS. How

> can anyone who doesn't trust Microsoft run Windows??

>





I doubt if everyone running Windows trusts Microsoft. I use it

because it's the most convenient for me -- I've tried Linux and it

always has some problem with hardware that I can't solve. Mind

you, so did Windows 7 x64, so maybe I'm no further ahead with this

version of Windows than I would be with Linux.



-Al-

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:



> "ray" wrote in message

> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net...

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may be

>>>>>>>>>>>>> running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run

>>>>>>>>>>>>> into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that,

>>>>>>>>>> billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions again.

>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up

>>>>>>>>>> with!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>

>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>

>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>>

>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to the

>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>

>>

>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>

>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>>

>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest of

>> the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an invalid!

>

> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece of

> shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has been

> free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be on

> every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it: legally.

> Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the desktop

> machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it and

> people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most.

>



What a crock of shit. Most people don't even know what Linux is! Imagine,

MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and they

still can't crack 90% - it ought to be at least 99.9. You would think

that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an

absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it!



> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they

> SUCK. That's why. Oops.



Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a computer?

Geez - I don't know.



>

>

>

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote:

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may be

>>>>>>>>>>>>> running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run

>>>>>>>>>>>>> into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that,

>>>>>>>>>> billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions again.

>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up

>>>>>>>>>> with!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>

>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>

>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>>

>> You've never come up with one example.

>

> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops!



Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE example

- but you can't - because there isn't one!



>

> Of course I can't connect to the

>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>

>>

>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>

>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>>

>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so!

>

> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post!

>

> The rest of

>> the world knows differently.

>

> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux.



I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have a

clue in the world what Linux is - thanks to the lying fud you and billy

baby and your friends pump out.



>

> Glad you like working with an invalid!

>

> Now comes the third lie in one post!

> Oops!...LOL!

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 3:14 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>

>> "ray" wrote in message

>> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net...

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that,

>>>>>>>>>>> billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions again.

>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up

>>>>>>>>>>> with!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>

>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>

>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>>>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>

>>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to the

>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>

>>>

>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>

>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>>>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>

>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest of

>>> the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an invalid!

>>

>> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece of

>> shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has been

>> free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be on

>> every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it: legally.

>> Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the desktop

>> machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it and

>> people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most.

>>

>

> What a crock of shit.



Yes, you are full of shit.



Most people don't even know what Linux is!



LIAR!



Imagine,

> MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and they

> still can't crack 90%



You dumb fuck...MS "cracked" 90% yrs ago.

Oops!



- it ought to be at least 99.9.



You're losing it ray-baby!



You would think

> that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an

> absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it!



Uhhh...now you've switched topics from desk tops to servers, huh?.

Oops!

>

>> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they

>> SUCK. That's why. Oops.

>

> Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a computer?

> Geez - I don't know.

>

If most all computers that are sold came with an OS then there wouldn't

not be any use for big box stores like Fry's or any of the hundreds of

Internet stores selling hardware/software components. Face it you lying

snake, a lot of people build their own.

Oops!



>

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine for

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else run

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten years

>>>>>>>>>>> now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation. Hell,

>>>>>>>>>>> I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in that,

>>>>>>>>>>> billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions again.

>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing to put up

>>>>>>>>>>> with!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch the

>>>>>>>>>> spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube spin?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>

>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>

>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love with

>>>> will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>

>>> You've never come up with one example.

>>

>> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops!

>

> Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE example

> - but you can't - because there isn't one!



I just did!

Oops!

>

>>

>> Of course I can't connect to the

>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>

>>>

>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>

>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os. Get

>>>> lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>

>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so!

>>

>> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post!

>>

>> The rest of

>>> the world knows differently.

>>

>> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux.

>

> I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have a

> clue in the world what Linux is...



That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being

available Millions now know about linux.

And uhhh...don't you open sores advocates keep saying that millions now

use linux?

Oops...again!...LOL!



- thanks to the lying fud you and billy

> baby and your friends pump out.



Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR!

Oops!

>

>>

>> Glad you like working with an invalid!

>>

>> Now comes the third lie in one post!

>> Oops!...LOL!

>

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:22:02 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/5/2010 3:14 PM, ray wrote:

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>

>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net...

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten

>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in

>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions

>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing

>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch

>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube

>>>>>>>>>> spin?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love

>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>>

>>>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to

>>>> the internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>>

>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os.

>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>>

>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest

>>>> of the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an

>>>> invalid!

>>>

>>> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece

>>> of shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has

>>> been free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be

>>> on every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it:

>>> legally. Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the

>>> desktop machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it

>>> and people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most.

>>>

>>>

>> What a crock of shit.

>

> Yes, you are full of shit.

>

> Most people don't even know what Linux is!

>

> LIAR!

>

> Imagine,

>> MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and

>> they still can't crack 90%

>

> You dumb fuck...MS "cracked" 90% yrs ago. Oops!



Well of course, they 'cracked' it - they hit a high and have been

dropping ever since. Most reasonable estimates put them below 90% now.



>

> - it ought to be at least 99.9.

>

> You're losing it ray-baby!

>

> You would think

>> that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an

>> absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it!

>

> Uhhh...now you've switched topics from desk tops to servers, huh?. Oops!



I haven't switched topics - it was YOU who was talking about desktops.

Oops!



>>

>>> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they

>>> SUCK. That's why. Oops.

>>

>> Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a

>> computer? Geez - I don't know.

>>

> If most all computers that are sold came with an OS then there wouldn't

> not be any use for big box stores like Fry's or any of the hundreds of

> Internet stores selling hardware/software components. Face it you lying

> snake, a lot of people build their own. Oops!



Yeah - probably a whopping 1%!

Oops!





>

>

 

[ray]

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:27:01 -0700, Frank wrote:



> On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote:

>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten

>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in

>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions

>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing

>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch

>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube

>>>>>>>>>> spin?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love

>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>>

>>>> You've never come up with one example.

>>>

>>> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops!

>>

>> Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE

>> example - but you can't - because there isn't one!

>

> I just did!

> Oops!

>>

>>

>>> Of course I can't connect to the

>>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>>

>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os.

>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>>

>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so!

>>>

>>> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post!

>>>

>>> The rest of

>>>> the world knows differently.

>>>

>>> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux.

>>

>> I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have

>> a clue in the world what Linux is...

>

> That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being

> available Millions now know about linux. And uhhh...don't you open sores

> advocates keep saying that millions now use linux?

> Oops...again!...LOL!



And most of the ones who DO know about Linux USE IT! Oops!





>

> - thanks to the lying fud you and billy

>> baby and your friends pump out.

>

> Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR!

> Oops!



You wish! Oops! All we need is ONE example, frankie - keep trying!





>>

>>

>>> Glad you like working with an invalid!

>>>

>>> Now comes the third lie in one post!

>>> Oops!...LOL!

>>

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 5:21 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:22:02 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 3:14 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>

>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>> news:81uvbtF2hkU14@mid.individual.net...

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten

>>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions

>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing

>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube

>>>>>>>>>>> spin?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love

>>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>>>

>>>>> You've never come up with one example. Of course I can't connect to

>>>>> the internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os.

>>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>>>

>>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so! The rest

>>>>> of the world knows differently. Glad you like working with an

>>>>> invalid!

>>>>

>>>> What a crock of shit. Most people think that Linux/Ubuntu is a piece

>>>> of shit. Imagine, Linux has been free for 20+ years and ubuntu has

>>>> been free for 5+ years. You would think that a free product would be

>>>> on every machine. Imagine, getting an OS without paying for it:

>>>> legally. Tell me why is Linux still on less than one percent of the

>>>> desktop machines out there? I'll tell you why. People don't like it

>>>> and people don't want it. It is rejected as garbage by most.

>>>>

>>>>

>>> What a crock of shit.

>>

>> Yes, you are full of shit.

>>

>> Most people don't even know what Linux is!

>>

>> LIAR!

>>

>> Imagine,

>>> MS has had a virtual monopoly on every system sold for 20 years and

>>> they still can't crack 90%

>>

>> You dumb fuck...MS "cracked" 90% yrs ago. Oops!

>

> Well of course, they 'cracked' it..



Lie #1...not what you already said.

Oops!



- they hit a high and have been

> dropping ever since.



Yet they have more total users.

Oops!



Most reasonable estimates put them below 90% now.



None of them do.





>

>>

>> - it ought to be at least 99.9.

>>

>> You're losing it ray-baby!

>>

>> You would think

>>> that a system that comes of virtually every machine sold would have an

>>> absolute monopoly yet most internet servers in the world don't use it!

>>

>> Uhhh...now you've switched topics from desk tops to servers, huh?. Oops!

>

> I haven't switched topics...



Lie #2.



- it was YOU who was talking about desktops.

> Oops!

>

No shit dipshit, seeing as how this is a Window 7 ng and in case you

didn't know, Windows 7 is a desktop OS, the very best desktop OS

available today.

>>>

>>>> Why wouldn't I want a free OS and a free Office Suite? Because they

>>>> SUCK. That's why. Oops.

>>>

>>> Because you've already paid for the one you have when you buy a

>>> computer? Geez - I don't know.

>>>

>> If most all computers that are sold came with an OS then there wouldn't

>> not be any use for big box stores like Fry's or any of the hundreds of

>> Internet stores selling hardware/software components. Face it you lying

>> snake, a lot of people build their own. Oops!

>

> Yeah - probably a whopping 1%!



Hummm...so you have verifiable empirical data to backup your 1% guess?

Oops!

 

[Frank]

On 4/5/2010 5:22 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:27:01 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 4/5/2010 3:17 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:10:04 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 4/5/2010 1:26 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:05:14 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 12:58 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:23:13 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 4/5/2010 11:57 AM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:30:08 +0200, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81unleF2hkU10@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:57:22 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ray" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:81ulp5F2hkU8@mid.individual.net...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:57:18 -0600, no_one wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brand new computer with win7 ultimate. Been working fine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the past few weeks till today. In the middle of the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon a message popped up on the screen saying we may

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be running an invalid copy. This is pure BS. Anyone else

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run into this problem?? Suggestions??

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ran Linux, you would never face that problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I love about you Rayboy.... Lying through your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teeth constantly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, billie baby, I've been running Linux for nearly ten

>>>>>>>>>>>>> years now and I've NEVER had to 'revalidate' an installation.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, I've never had to 'validate' one. Where's the lie in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> that, billie baby? Must be running on your own definitions

>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. Absolutely amazing to me what some folks are willing

>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put up with!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you have never had to validate an installation. They

>>>>>>>>>>>> give that SHITTY OS away! LOL! Go play with Ubuntu and watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> the spinning cube. That could keep you busy for hours!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> This should be good. So, hot shot, how do you make the cube

>>>>>>>>>>> spin?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Please note that there is a difference between "rotate" and

>>>>>>>>>> "spin".

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> But billie baby doesn't seem to grasp that.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yeah...the cube rotates and you guys "spin" your lies in here. Got

>>>>>>>> it ray-baby?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah - I got it. Except that given many opportunities to 'put up or

>>>>>>> shut up' with your accusations of my lying, you have NEVER produced

>>>>>>> one example. Real problem for you, eh frankie.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry ray-the-LIAR, but I and others have caught you lying in here

>>>>>> numerous times. Try google...if that POS toy os you're so in love

>>>>>> with will let you connect to the Internet.

>>>>>

>>>>> You've never come up with one example.

>>>>

>>>> This is a very good example of your lies. Oops!

>>>

>>> Very simple for you to put it to rest for good - just give us ONE

>>> example - but you can't - because there isn't one!

>>

>> I just did!

>> Oops!

>>>

>>>

>>>> Of course I can't connect to the

>>>>> internet - I post here via my electric personality.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>> BTW - there's more than one reason MS is called an 'invalid'.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But there is only one reason liux is called a POS useless toy os.

>>>>>> Get lost ray, you have no business here.

>>>>>

>>>>> Ah, but you and billy baby are the only ones who think so!

>>>>

>>>> Now that is the second example of your lying in one post!

>>>>

>>>> The rest of

>>>>> the world knows differently.

>>>>

>>>> They do? Face it LIAR, the WORLD runs on Windows...not linux.

>>>

>>> I didn't say otherwise - did I! The fact is that most people don't have

>>> a clue in the world what Linux is...

>>

>> That is pure unadulterated LYING BULLSHIT!! After 20+ years of being

>> available Millions now know about linux. And uhhh...don't you open sores

>> advocates keep saying that millions now use linux?

>> Oops...again!...LOL!

>

> And most of the ones who DO know about Linux USE IT! Oops!



hehehe...can't keep your lies straight huh?

Figures..you and alias are known liars.

>

>

>>

>> - thanks to the lying fud you and billy

>>> baby and your friends pump out.

>>

>> Caught you lying again ray-the LIAR!

>> Oops!

>

> You wish! Oops! All we need is ONE example, frankie - keep trying!



Well, in the last two or three post of yours I caught you lying at least

half a dozen times.

Big oops!...LOL!

>

>

>>>

>>>

>>>> Glad you like working with an invalid!

>>>>

>>>> Now comes the third lie in one post!

>>>> Oops!...LOL!

>>>

>