Need Win7 drivers for HP932 printer?

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:30:37 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>

>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>

>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>> proprietary code either?

>>

>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>> house.

>>

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>

>Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.





How can it be Canon's fault?



Ubuntu goes crawling to Canon. "Please, please let us have your

preparatory drivers to include with Ubuntu to make us look better",

and Canon says "No, boy. those are our drivers, we developed them, and

if you want them you need to either buy a printer or pay us."



All your cheap ass Ubuntu had to do is duke Canon a few bucks and buy

a license but they are too stingy.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:36:46 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>

>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>

>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>> house.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>

>>

>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>> do

>>

>

>So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?





I think that you are going to have a bit of a problem justifying "Open

source" as freeware. And, please note there is a difference between

the idea of "open source" and your "free Software", and kindly don't

prevaricate and say that you never mentioned "free software".



If, for example, Fedora 9 had been developed by an individual company

the costs would have been in the region of 10.8 billion dollars (using

the COCOMO man-month estimation model.). Do you seriously believe that

a company is going to spend 10.8 billion dollars of their

shareholder's money and then give the software away?



Just as you told the story about the Windows Directory being the

Windows kernel, you now use the cliche "open-source" and still don't

know what you are talking about.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:22:47 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>> do

>>>>

>>>

>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>

>>

>> Software is not air.

>

>We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>than just software.





You were the bloke who said that software will be free. Of course,

like the famous "Windows Directory Kernel" that you also talked about

it is so much hot air, but you said it. we just repeated it.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>> do

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Software is not air.

>>>

>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>> than just software.

>>>

>>

>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>

>>>>

>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>

>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>> about shit.

>>>

>>

>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>

>You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>

>> Has worked well for me.

>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>

>No sex, eh? Sad.

>

>>

>>>>

>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>

>>

>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>

>Um, yes it is.

>

>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>

>

>Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".





Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

channel. But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

adventures that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>> Good job.

>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>

>>>

>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>> LOL

>>

>> Who's slinking?

>>

>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>

>>

>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>

>

> I'm dead on right.

> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

> in hospitals left and right.

> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

> Global warming is scary?

> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>



You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>

>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>> than just software.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>

>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>> about shit.

>>>>

>>>

>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>

>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>

>>> Has worked well for me.

>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>

>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>

>> Um, yes it is.

>>

>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>

>>

>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>

>

> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

> channel.



That was Death who did that.



> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

> adventures



I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

imagination.



And, that not being enough, you invent this:



that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)



Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

did in the sixties for him.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:22:47 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>> do

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>

>>>

>>> Software is not air.

>>

>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>> than just software.

>

>

> You were the bloke who said that software will be free.



I didn't say that. Can you prove I did? Didn't think so.



> Of course,

> like the famous "Windows Directory Kernel" that you also talked about



I talked about the Windows kernel and the Windows registry. You're

making things up again.



> it is so much hot air, but you said it. we just repeated it.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)



No, you made it up.

--

Alias

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:36:46 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>

>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>

>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>> house.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>> do

>>>

>>

>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>

>

> I think that you are going to have a bit of a problem justifying "Open

> source" as freeware. And, please note there is a difference between

> the idea of "open source" and your "free Software", and kindly don't

> prevaricate and say that you never mentioned "free software".

>

> If, for example, Fedora 9 had been developed by an individual company

> the costs would have been in the region of 10.8 billion dollars (using

> the COCOMO man-month estimation model.). Do you seriously believe that

> a company is going to spend 10.8 billion dollars of their

> shareholder's money and then give the software away?

>

> Just as you told the story about the Windows Directory being the

> Windows kernel, you now use the cliche "open-source" and still don't

> know what you are talking about.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)



There are so many lies here, it isn't worth pointing them out. Suffice

to say this person is full of shit.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:30:37 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>

>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>

>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>> proprietary code either?

>>>

>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>> house.

>>>

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>

>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>

>

> How can it be Canon's fault?

>

> Ubuntu goes crawling to Canon. "Please, please let us have your

> preparatory drivers to include with Ubuntu to make us look better",

> and Canon says "No, boy. those are our drivers, we developed them, and

> if you want them you need to either buy a printer or pay us."

>

> All your cheap ass Ubuntu had to do is duke Canon a few bucks and buy

> a license but they are too stingy.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)



Note: this lame boy is acting like he was at the meeting, if there even

was one, between Canon and Canonical. Fat chance that happened.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:



>

> But tell us more about the Windows Directory Kernel that you have

> mentioned. I'm really interested in that.

>

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)



Not what I said. Prove me wrong (you can't). What I did say is that

programs are all dependent on the registry, including the kernel which

is why Windows is so vulnerable to malware. I never mentioned the word

"directory", lame boy.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>>

>>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>>> than just software.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>>

>>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>>> about shit.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>

>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>

>>>> Has worked well for me.

>>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>>

>>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>>

>>> Um, yes it is.

>>>

>>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>>

>>>

>>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>>

>>

>> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

>> channel.

>

> That was Death who did that.

>



I did not.

You mentioned sex first, then kept expanding from there.

Yet another side effect of the '60s...memory loss.



>> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

>> adventures

>

> I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

> imagination.

>



Well, you did seem to know a lot about it.





> And, that not being enough, you invent this:

>

> that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

>> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>

> Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

> did in the sixties for him.

>



Party and protest?

Thanks for getting high day and night.

Now every moron in the world thinks their idiotic ideas are "causes".



How often did you wake up missing a day or two?



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>>>> than just software.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>>>> about shit.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>

>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>

>>>>> Has worked well for me.

>>>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>>>

>>>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>>>

>>>> Um, yes it is.

>>>>

>>>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>>>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>>>

>>>

>>> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

>>> channel.

>>

>> That was Death who did that.

>>

>

> I did not.

> You mentioned sex first, then kept expanding from there.

> Yet another side effect of the '60s...memory loss.

>

>>> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

>>> adventures

>>

>> I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

>> imagination.

>>

>

> Well, you did seem to know a lot about it.

>

>

>> And, that not being enough, you invent this:

>>

>> that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

>>> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>>

>> Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

>> did in the sixties for him.

>>

>

> Party and protest?

> Thanks for getting high day and night.

> Now every moron in the world thinks their idiotic ideas are "causes".

>

> How often did you wake up missing a day or two?

>



Fucking ingrate.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>> LOL

>>>

>>> Who's slinking?

>>>

>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>

>>>

>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>

>>

>> I'm dead on right.

>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>> in hospitals left and right.

>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>> Global warming is scary?

>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>

>

> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>



Ungrateful for what?

The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".



If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>> LOL

>>>>

>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>

>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>

>>>

>>> I'm dead on right.

>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>> Global warming is scary?

>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>

>>

>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>

>

> Ungrateful for what?

> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.



Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

I could go on and on.



> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".



"All we are saying is give peace a chance".



> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>



And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

right?



--

Alias

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:29:53 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>>

>>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>>> than just software.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>>

>>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>>> about shit.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>

>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>

>>>> Has worked well for me.

>>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>>

>>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>>

>>> Um, yes it is.

>>>

>>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>>

>>>

>>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>>

>>

>> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

>> channel.

>

>That was Death who did that.

>

>> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

>> adventures

>

>I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

>imagination.

>

>And, that not being enough, you invent this:

>

> that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

>> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>

>Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

>did in the sixties for him.



And what kind of funny cigarettes are you smoking? What in God's World

did you imagine that you did for me in the '60's



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>

>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>

>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>

>>>

>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>

>>

>> Ungrateful for what?

>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

>

> Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

> joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

> I could go on and on.

>



Nice list there.

Microsizing computers, maybe...they were already around since the '40s.

Rock is good, so is color TV.

Man on the Moon?

Trillions of dollars invested, satellite tech the only useful

side-effect...and the private industries that profit from that should be

paying for that.

Birth control pills?

And yet...the poor and destitute procreate like rabbits.

We are a world of growing populations unable to sustain themselves with

the basics...like food.



>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>

> "All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>



And, when that fails ... fight to win...give no quarter



>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>

>

> And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

> right?

>



No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

situation.

War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

little quicker.

War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

short one.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:29:53 +0200, Alias

> wrote:

>

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>>>> than just software.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>>>> about shit.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>

>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>

>>>>> Has worked well for me.

>>>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>>>

>>>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>>>

>>>> Um, yes it is.

>>>>

>>>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>>>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>>>

>>>

>>> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

>>> channel.

>>

>> That was Death who did that.

>>

>>> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

>>> adventures

>>

>> I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

>> imagination.

>>

>> And, that not being enough, you invent this:

>>

>> that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

>>> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>>

>> Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

>> did in the sixties for him.

>

> And what kind of funny cigarettes are you smoking? What in God's World

> did you imagine that you did for me in the '60's

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)



Ingrate.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>>

>>>

>>> Ungrateful for what?

>>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

>>

>> Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

>> joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

>> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

>> I could go on and on.

>>

>

> Nice list there.

> Microsizing computers, maybe...they were already around since the '40s.

> Rock is good, so is color TV.

> Man on the Moon?

> Trillions of dollars invested, satellite tech the only useful

> side-effect...and the private industries that profit from that should be

> paying for that.

> Birth control pills?

> And yet...the poor and destitute procreate like rabbits.



Not true anymore. The population explosion is over. Please try to keep

up. Not only that, the world is getting older and, hopefully, wiser.



> We are a world of growing populations unable to sustain themselves with

> the basics...like food.



See above.



>

>>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>>

>> "All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>>

>

> And, when that fails ... fight to win...give no quarter



Peace hasn't been given a chance yet due to people like you.



>

>>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>>

>>

>> And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

>> right?

>>

>

> No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

> situation.

> War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

> little quicker.

> War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

> short one.

>



You are thinking of last century's wars. Cyberwar is the new thing. Ya

know, knocking out electrical grids and such.

--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Ungrateful for what?

>>>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>>>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

>>>

>>> Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

>>> joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

>>> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

>>> I could go on and on.

>>>

>>

>> Nice list there.

>> Microsizing computers, maybe...they were already around since the '40s.

>> Rock is good, so is color TV.

>> Man on the Moon?

>> Trillions of dollars invested, satellite tech the only useful

>> side-effect...and the private industries that profit from that should be

>> paying for that.

>> Birth control pills?

>> And yet...the poor and destitute procreate like rabbits.

>

> Not true anymore. The population explosion is over. Please try to keep

> up. Not only that, the world is getting older and, hopefully, wiser.

>



Where? in Spain?

You just make stuff up.



>> We are a world of growing populations unable to sustain themselves with

>> the basics...like food.

>

> See above.

>



See nothing...you just made up some "fact"



>>

>>>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>>>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>>>

>>> "All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>>>

>>

>> And, when that fails ... fight to win...give no quarter

>

> Peace hasn't been given a chance yet due to people like you.

>



I've never attacked anyone ... but I will fiercly defend myself.



>>

>>>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>>>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>>>

>>>

>>> And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

>>> right?

>>>

>>

>> No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

>> situation.

>> War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

>> little quicker.

>> War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

>> short one.

>>

>

> You are thinking of last century's wars. Cyberwar is the new thing. Ya

> know, knocking out electrical grids and such.



You knock out my lights, I'll drop a 2000# bomb on your house.

Let's see who's still standing after that.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[KG]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:03:38 -0400, KG wrote:



>My installation or Windows 7 Home Premium will not support our full featured HP 932 printer, it has

>all the extras. Is there any way it locate signed Windows 7 drivers that will support the full

>features?

>*****************

>Thank You kgsAT@msbx.net



The problem being the HP window 7 drivers only support the basic 932 printer not the full function

932.

*****************

Thank You kgsAT@msbx.net





To reply to this email please remove the AT

after the kgs in the reply to address as shown above.



"Never argue with the ignorant.

They can't tell when you've won."