Need Win7 drivers for HP932 printer?

[Bob I]

On 4/25/2010 7:15 AM, KG wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:03:38 -0400, KG wrote:

>

>> My installation or Windows 7 Home Premium will not support our full featured HP 932 printer, it has

>> all the extras. Is there any way it locate signed Windows 7 drivers that will support the full

>> features?

>> *****************

>> Thank You kgsAT@msbx.net

>

> The problem being the HP window 7 drivers only support the basic 932 printer not the full function

> 932.

> *****************

> Thank You kgsAT@msbx.net

>



The User Manual copyright is October 1999. That predates Windows 2000. I

suspect that you aren't going to get much more support.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>>>>

>>>>> Ungrateful for what?

>>>>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>>>>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

>>>> Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

>>>> joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

>>>> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

>>>> I could go on and on.

>>>>

>>> Nice list there.

>>> Microsizing computers, maybe...they were already around since the '40s.

>>> Rock is good, so is color TV.

>>> Man on the Moon?

>>> Trillions of dollars invested, satellite tech the only useful

>>> side-effect...and the private industries that profit from that should be

>>> paying for that.

>>> Birth control pills?

>>> And yet...the poor and destitute procreate like rabbits.

>> Not true anymore. The population explosion is over. Please try to keep

>> up. Not only that, the world is getting older and, hopefully, wiser.

>>

>

> Where? in Spain?

> You just make stuff up.

>

>>> We are a world of growing populations unable to sustain themselves with

>>> the basics...like food.

>> See above.

>>

>

> See nothing...you just made up some "fact"

>

>>>>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>>>>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>>>> "All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>>>>

>>> And, when that fails ... fight to win...give no quarter

>> Peace hasn't been given a chance yet due to people like you.

>>

>

> I've never attacked anyone ... but I will fiercly defend myself.

>

>>>>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>>>>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>>>>

>>>> And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

>>>> right?

>>>>

>>> No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

>>> situation.

>>> War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

>>> little quicker.

>>> War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

>>> short one.

>>>

>> You are thinking of last century's wars. Cyberwar is the new thing. Ya

>> know, knocking out electrical grids and such.

>

> You knock out my lights, I'll drop a 2000# bomb on your house.



Only if you know who did it.



> Let's see who's still standing after that.

>



Not you, that's for sure.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>>>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>>>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>>>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>>>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>>>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>>>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ungrateful for what?

>>>>>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>>>>>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.

>>>>> Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

>>>>> joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

>>>>> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

>>>>> I could go on and on.

>>>>>

>>>> Nice list there.

>>>> Microsizing computers, maybe...they were already around since the '40s.

>>>> Rock is good, so is color TV.

>>>> Man on the Moon?

>>>> Trillions of dollars invested, satellite tech the only useful

>>>> side-effect...and the private industries that profit from that should be

>>>> paying for that.

>>>> Birth control pills?

>>>> And yet...the poor and destitute procreate like rabbits.

>>> Not true anymore. The population explosion is over. Please try to keep

>>> up. Not only that, the world is getting older and, hopefully, wiser.

>>>

>>

>> Where? in Spain?

>> You just make stuff up.

>>

>>>> We are a world of growing populations unable to sustain themselves with

>>>> the basics...like food.

>>> See above.

>>>

>>

>> See nothing...you just made up some "fact"

>>

>>>>>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>>>>>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>>>>> "All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>>>>>

>>>> And, when that fails ... fight to win...give no quarter

>>> Peace hasn't been given a chance yet due to people like you.

>>>

>>

>> I've never attacked anyone ... but I will fiercly defend myself.

>>

>>>>>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>>>>>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>>>>>

>>>>> And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

>>>>> right?

>>>>>

>>>> No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

>>>> situation.

>>>> War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

>>>> little quicker.

>>>> War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

>>>> short one.

>>>>

>>> You are thinking of last century's wars. Cyberwar is the new thing. Ya

>>> know, knocking out electrical grids and such.

>>

>> You knock out my lights, I'll drop a 2000# bomb on your house.

>

> Only if you know who did it.

>

>> Let's see who's still standing after that.

>>

>

> Not you, that's for sure.

>



LOL.

You, by your own admission, are an old,sickly fellow.

I am mean to the core, don't suffer fools, and work out regularly.

It would take quite a few old geezers of your caliber to take me

on.



If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

fun of it.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:



>

> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

> fun of it.

>



I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>

>>

>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>> fun of it.

>>

>

> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>



They tried that.

Didn't go over very well.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>> fun of it.

>>>

>>

>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>

>

> They tried that.



No, they didn't.



> Didn't go over very well.

>



It only would have been tried if the North let the South go and I am

suggesting they do just that now. Thanks for telling me you're from the

South. It explains a lot.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>> fun of it.

>>>>

>>>

>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>

>>

>> They tried that.

>

> No, they didn't.

>



Yes they did, dumbass.



>> Didn't go over very well.

>>

>

> It only would have been tried if the North let the South go and I am

> suggesting they do just that now. Thanks for telling me you're from the

> South. It explains a lot.

>



I live in the South...was born up North.

Oops...being conservative isn't a function of place of birth, nor

stereotyping.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>

>>>

>>> They tried that.

>>

>> No, they didn't.

>>

>

> Yes they did, dumbass.



No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

tried out two different countries.



>

>>> Didn't go over very well.

>>>

>>

>> It only would have been tried if the North let the South go and I am

>> suggesting they do just that now. Thanks for telling me you're from the

>> South. It explains a lot.

>>

>

> I live in the South...was born up North.



That explains even more.



> Oops...being conservative isn't a function of place of birth, nor

> stereotyping.

>



Being a conservative is being anti progress. Time to change the shoes on

your horses, cowboy.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> They tried that.

>>>

>>> No, they didn't.

>>>

>>

>> Yes they did, dumbass.

>

> No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

> tried out two different countries.

>



I said "they *tried* that."

They tried to succeed.

Follow along now ... you said "...is if the South would secede and

form..."

They... the South...tried that.



Man 'o man.



>>

>>>> Didn't go over very well.

>>>>

>>>

>>> It only would have been tried if the North let the South go and I am

>>> suggesting they do just that now. Thanks for telling me you're from the

>>> South. It explains a lot.

>>>

>>

>> I live in the South...was born up North.

>

> That explains even more.

>

>> Oops...being conservative isn't a function of place of birth, nor

>> stereotyping.

>>

>

> Being a conservative is being anti progress. Time to change the shoes on

> your horses, cowboy.

>



Well, as you throw Bush and a few other names about, you seem to believe

I am some kind of Republican.

I am not.

Closest category I would fit is "fiscal conservative" I suppose.

I think government should be small, as by historical observation, they

are inefficient, wasteful, their goal is to consolidate power, gain more

power, and create a society totally dependant.



What you think of that bothers me none...as I am right....you are

delusional and need your hand held.



If your bank statement balance was -$30,000 you would write more

checks?

You think you can borrow your way out of that?



Do you "manage debt"?

That is an oxymoron...debt manages you.



The shit will hit the fan at some point ... the current "debt managers"

have a single goal in mind...to get old and die before payment is due.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> They tried that.

>>>>

>>>> No, they didn't.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yes they did, dumbass.

>>

>> No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

>> tried out two different countries.

>>

>

> I said "they *tried* that."

> They tried to succeed.

> Follow along now ... you said "...is if the South would secede and

> form..."

> They... the South...tried that.



Two separate countries has not been tried.

>

> Man 'o man.



Snip ill informed Ron Paul drivel.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> They tried that.

>>>>>

>>>>> No, they didn't.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Yes they did, dumbass.

>>>

>>> No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

>>> tried out two different countries.

>>>

>>

>> I said "they *tried* that."

>> They tried to succeed.

>> Follow along now ... you said "...is if the South would secede and

>> form..."

>> They... the South...tried that.

>

> Two separate countries has not been tried.



It *was* tried.

You really are gosh darn stupid.

The goal of the South was *to be* their own nation, independent of the

Federal government, to create their own government...the Confederate

States of America.



>>

>> Man 'o man.

>

> Snip ill informed Ron Paul drivel.

>



Of course...best snip reality.

Don't worry...debt goes away magically sometimes.



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Death wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>>>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>>>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> They tried that.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> No, they didn't.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Yes they did, dumbass.

>>>>

>>>> No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

>>>> tried out two different countries.

>>>>

>>>

>>> I said "they *tried* that."

>>> They tried to succeed.

>>> Follow along now ... you said "...is if the South would secede and

>>> form..."

>>> They... the South...tried that.

>>

>> Two separate countries has not been tried.

>

> It *was* tried.



No, it wasn't.



> You really are gosh darn stupid.

> The goal of the South was *to be* their own nation, independent of the

> Federal government, to create their own government...the Confederate

> States of America.



We know but that's not what I said. When there are two countries, then

they are trying it, dumb fuck.



>> Snip ill informed Ron Paul drivel.



Snip more Ron Paul drivel.



--

Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:



> Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you've ever been in the south US, you'll know we fight just for the

>>>>>>>>>> fun of it.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I lived in Texas for seven years. Fucking inbred retards who can't speak

>>>>>>>>> English properly. The best thing that could happen to the USA is if the

>>>>>>>>> South would secede and form their own backwards ass "conservative" country.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> They tried that.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> No, they didn't.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yes they did, dumbass.

>>>>>

>>>>> No, they didn't. The South lost. Had they won, then they would have

>>>>> tried out two different countries.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I said "they *tried* that."

>>>> They tried to succeed.

>>>> Follow along now ... you said "...is if the South would secede and

>>>> form..."

>>>> They... the South...tried that.

>>>

>>> Two separate countries has not been tried.

>>

>> It *was* tried.

>

> No, it wasn't.

>



Whatever moron.

Seems being a socialist and stupid go hand in hand.



>> You really are gosh darn stupid.

>> The goal of the South was *to be* their own nation, independent of the

>> Federal government, to create their own government...the Confederate

>> States of America.

>

> We know but that's not what I said. When there are two countries, then

> they are trying it, dumb fuck.

>



When you try to cross the street, and a bus hits you, you didn't really

try to cross the street?

Since you didn't reach the other side, your goal was to get hit by a

bus?

Your brain works funny....side effects again?



>>> Snip ill informed Ron Paul drivel.

>

> Snip more Ron Paul drivel.

>



--

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:29:53 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:42:39 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>>>> do

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Software is not air.

>>>>>

>>>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>>>> than just software.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Ummm, I'm talking software.

>>>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime

>>>>>> commitment to a non-relative.

>>>>>

>>>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has

>>>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where

>>>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a

>>>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved

>>>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in

>>>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think

>>>>> about shit.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>

>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>

>>>> Has worked well for me.

>>>> You do what you want, I don't care.

>>>

>>> No sex, eh? Sad.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to

>>>>>> your expert opinion.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?

>>>> It ain't "having sex", moron.

>>>

>>> Um, yes it is.

>>>

>>>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

>>>>

>>>

>>> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet

>>> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

>>

>>

>> Goodness, but you seem to have twisted this thread into a non computer

>> channel.

>

>That was Death who did that.

>

>> But alias, are you really so proud of your one handed sexual

>> adventures

>

>I didn't post that. You plucked that one right out of your twisted

>imagination.

>

>And, that not being enough, you invent this:

>

> that you want to publicize them? Are you also a "flasher"?

>> Wear the long, black, overcoat, do you?

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>

>Another ingrate who thinks he's cool and clever and has no idea what we

>did in the sixties for him.





Lets see:

ingrate ~ noun a person who shows no gratitude



Now tell us, why in the world would I ever be feeing any gratitude for

you?



Or more likely, you have no idea what the word means?



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:42:07 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:29:53 +0200, Alias



Much immaterial stuff snipped



>> And what kind of funny cigarettes are you smoking? What in God's World

>> did you imagine that you did for me in the '60's

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>

>Ingrate.



Well, we certainly are aware that you've learned a new word, but you

seem a bit inapt at applying it. But keep striving and ultimately you

will learn.



Which has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that there is nothing

in the world that you have done that would invoke any feeling of

gratitude from anyone here.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:31:35 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:22:47 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>>>>>> house.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I

>>>>>> do

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get

>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do

>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Software is not air.

>>>

>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You

>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free

>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things

>>> than just software.

>>

>>

>> You were the bloke who said that software will be free.

>

>I didn't say that. Can you prove I did? Didn't think so.

>

>> Of course,

>> like the famous "Windows Directory Kernel" that you also talked about

>

>I talked about the Windows kernel and the Windows registry. You're

>making things up again.

>

>> it is so much hot air, but you said it. we just repeated it.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>

>No, you made it up.





Alias you are a liar and below is the message where you exhibited your

ignorance about computers by stating that MS called the kernel a

registry:



Path:

news.albasani.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

From: Alias

Newsgroups: alt.windows7.general

Subject: Re: Windows more secure - Hacker states

Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:28:59 +0200

Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

Lines: 50

Message-ID:

References:









Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain charset=UTF-8 format=flowed

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:29:01 +0000 (UTC)

Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org

posting-host="DdN3xFErTDWgbhDnDCkq5Q"

logging-data="15532"

mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"

posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RpLT7cJ8YtNFrRFgGYlEW"

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

In-Reply-To:

Cancel-Lock: sha1:eXyyxv00ZdZuihbNchrFvQshTy8=

Xref: news.albasani.net alt.windows7.general:11734



Bill Yanaire wrote:

>

>

> "ray" wrote in message

> news:8349pqFhp0U45@mid.individual.net...

>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:27 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:

>>

>>> On 19 Apr 2010 22:42:31 GMT, ray wrote:

>>>

>>>> I run Ubuntu and Debian and a couple of other Linux distributions and

>>>> I've not had to resort to "cryptic line commands" to get any of them

>>>> running at any point.

>>>

>>> Why do you need to run more than one distribution?

>>>

>>> Steve

>>

>> Taylor the distro to the machine. I run Debian on my wife's netbook and

>> on a 'lite' desktop because they are better for those architectures. I

>> run Ubuntu (not the most recent version) on a couple of desktops and a

>> 2ghz laptop. Run Gentoo on a mini-itx.

>

> Wow. Sounds like you have a lot of work to do just to get those INFERIOR

> distros working. So one is better for certain "architectures"? What does

> that mean? They are not compatible with the hardware? Sounds like it. If

> you need to run a few different OS! With Windows, all you need to do is

> install it, the updates will run and load your apps. Simple.

>

> Now go spend another 10 hours looking up what needs to be fixed on each

> distro, look into drivers and see if you can find them and then go spend

> some time watching the spinning cube. LOL!

>

>

>



Lies:



No need to use a command line.



The cube does not spin by itself.



Drivers are not a problem in Ubuntu like they are in Windows 7



******************** stared for emphasis



The architecture is the structure where to access the root kernel, you

need to key in your password or it ain't going there. In Windows, most

programs are intertwined with the registry (MS' stupid name for a

kernel) and are therefore more vulnerable.



--

Alias



************************************



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:34:23 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:30:37 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use

>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to

>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically

>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/

>>>>>>

>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a

>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.

>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's

>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the

>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon

>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,

>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the

>>>> proprietary code either?

>>>>

>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of

>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers

>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software

>>>> house.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you

>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.

>>

>>

>> How can it be Canon's fault?

>>

>> Ubuntu goes crawling to Canon. "Please, please let us have your

>> preparatory drivers to include with Ubuntu to make us look better",

>> and Canon says "No, boy. those are our drivers, we developed them, and

>> if you want them you need to either buy a printer or pay us."

>>

>> All your cheap ass Ubuntu had to do is duke Canon a few bucks and buy

>> a license but they are too stingy.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>

>Note: this lame boy is acting like he was at the meeting, if there even

>was one, between Canon and Canonical. Fat chance that happened.





Of course I wasn't there. After all who would want to get that

intimately associated with Ubuntu (the Newbee's dream).



But more to the point, you are a liar. Not bad enough you can't tell

the difference between the windows Registry and the Windows Kernel,

but when challenged you lie and said "I didn't say that".



Unfortunately copies of your foolishness are available so you got

caught.



Alias you lie!



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:41:55 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>John B. Slocomb wrote:

>

>>

>> But tell us more about the Windows Directory Kernel that you have

>> mentioned. I'm really interested in that.

>>

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)

>

>Not what I said. Prove me wrong (you can't). What I did say is that

>programs are all dependent on the registry, including the kernel which

>is why Windows is so vulnerable to malware. I never mentioned the word

>"directory", lame boy.





I already did, ALIAS IS A LIAR!



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:20:42 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>Death wrote:

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Death wrote:

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Just too young.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the

>>>>>>>>>>> sexual revolution.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during

>>>>>>>>>>>> that time,too.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> A shame.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should

>>>>>>>>>> be complete next month).

>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?

>>>>>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?

>>>>>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and

>>>>>>>>> you come up with this shit.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?

>>>>>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally

>>>>>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards

>>>>>>>> should pay the bill?

>>>>>>>> Hey, thanks.

>>>>>>>> Good job.

>>>>>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.

>>>>>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I'd slink away, too.

>>>>>> LOL

>>>>>

>>>>> Who's slinking?

>>>>>

>>>>>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.

>>>>>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You don't know what you're talking about.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I'm dead on right.

>>>> You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.

>>>> All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped

>>>> in hospitals left and right.

>>>> Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?

>>>> Global warming is scary?

>>>> Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

>>>>

>>>

>>> You really are a low life ingrate, you know that?

>>>

>>

>> Ungrateful for what?

>> The only thing passed from the '60s was whiney cry babies that bitch and

>> moan to the point that the USA is virtually socialist now.



*************** stared for emphasis



>Civil rights. Decriminalizing pot (in Texas you could get LIFE for one

>joint). Sexual freedom. Right to divorce. Man on the moon. Birth control

> pills. Cure for polio. Computers. Rock and Roll. Long hair. Color TV.

>I could go on and on.



*************************************



>> We can't even actually fight a war and win now-a-days, cause we got to

>> pussy foot around and play "nice , touchy-feely war".

>

>"All we are saying is give peace a chance".

>

>> If I was running the show, The Afghan war would have lasted 3 weeks, and

>> the average daily temp over there would have increased by 15F.

>>

>

>And you would have also said, "the only good Afghan is a dead Afghan",

>right?





In a separate message you seemed to be saying that I/we should be

thankful to "us", implying you were involved, for something or

another, however you never enumerated the benefits that you and yours

had given us.



Are we to take the above for the benefits that you and yours obtained?



Lets see... Civil rights - doesn't effect me one way or the other.



Decriminalizing Pot - doesn't effect me as I don't smoke pot.



Sexual freedom - Hasn't effected me and is probably largely

responsible for the dynamic growth of AIDS



Right to divorce -



The first know divorce regulation is found in the Code of Hammurabi in

ancient Babylonia.



The first divorce law in the US dates back to 1701 (before the

establishment of the U.S.A.)



Apparently you are either lying again or you don't know what you are

talking about. the former is most likely



Man on the Moon - what has this to do with anyone?



Birth control pills - again no effect on my life whatsoever.



Computers - really grasping for evidence here but the first

description of a computing device dates back to the Babbage analytical

Engine first described in 1837.



The Z1 originally created by Germany's Konrad Zuse in his parents

living room in 1936 to 1938 is considered to be the first electrical

binary programmable computer.



The first digital computer



Short for Atanasoff-Berry Computer, the ABC started being developed by

Professor John Vincent Atanasoff and graduate student Cliff Berry in

1937 and continued to be developed until 1942 at the Iowa State

College (now Iowa State University). On October 19, 1973, US Federal

Judge Earl R. Larson signed his decision that the ENIAC patent by

Eckert and Mauchly was invalid and named Atanasoff the inventor of the

electronic digital computer.



The first transistor computer



The TX-O (Transistorized Experimental computer) and first

transistorized computer is demonstrated at the Massachusetts Institute

of Technology in 1956.



On to a new subject Rock and Roll - you are saying that this is

music?



Long hair??? Long hair has existed throughout history.



Alias you are either lying yet again or you are singularly uneducated.

Probably a combination of the two.



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:45:47 +0200, Alias

wrote:



>> No, I'm sure many Afghans are perfectly good people...stuck in a bad

>> situation.

>> War is hell, but when you obliterate the enemy...they tend to give up a

>> little quicker.

>> War is not nice, isn't designed to be nice, and the only good war is a

>> short one.

>>

>

>You are thinking of last century's wars. Cyberwar is the new thing. Ya

>know, knocking out electrical grids and such.





The new thing, eh? and where is that taking place? On the pages of

your comic book?



John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)