My Vista Experience.

  • Thread starter cozzmo1@hotmail.com
  • Start date
A

AJB

I have been reading the posts to find some fixes to Vista B version.
One thing I keep seeing through the posts is most of the issues are coming
from Vista Home versions. As I have not ran Home only Vista Ultimate 64bit
and it runs like a champ and now Vista Business on a Domain with Admin perms
all seems to be working. The apps I have run into in the office with
compatibility issues I have ran in compatibility mode as XP and they work
just fine. I have been a bit surprise that some of them do but I have found
some really good info in the posts.
The only thing that I don’t like at the moment is the remove of my network
places in explore and when you click networks it shows the whole domain
that’s a pain. Many of the issue sound the same as when XP came out and the
home version has many things stripped out. I have never been a big fan of
Home versions. I also understand that we tend to get stuck with these
versions and you have to run what you have and make the best of it. I have to
agree I have never been a big AOL fan as it just seems it has been in only my
experience very problematic. Have no view on the current version have not had
to support it in a while. Remember if you install any of the Anti
Virus\Security software that Vista does have Firewall and Defender running
could possibly cause too many security settings. Just my opinion. I do work
in the IT field but I am just a humble tech and tend to learn from everyone
by just watching.


"Mac" wrote:

> "Frank" wrote:
>
> > DanS wrote:
> >
> > > Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote i
> > > news:#OFngeq7HHA.1900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Nah...no need to check anything...cause he's a "Network Engineer"
> > >>remember? Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm sure he's at least as much a "Network Engineer" as you are a "Field
> > > Engineer".

> >
> > hehehe...sorry dan'o, but our Vista Ultimate installs, all nine of them,
> > are running just fine.
> > And oh, btw, I'm personally running the latest, Vista compatible version
> > of Nero.
> > Is that too complicated for you to understand?
> > Frank
> >

>
> Sorry, Frank, but it seems to me that You really have some presonal
> problems .
>
>
 
J

jinkyjoany

"cozzmo1@hotmail.com" wrote:

>
> > As you had a memory problem almost anything could happen.
> > Have you tried since you fixed the machine?
> >

> I did.
>
>
>
> I will answer several posts here.
>
> -------
>
> Vista user, (his name says it all)
> I want to relay my experience and I hope it may help others with some
> of the same issues.
>
> I shouldn't run AOL or Mcafee?? ,
> that I didn't check vista drivers??, (I did)
> You must not have read my post.
> You said I was "trying to hack the number of connections". (I didn't
> actually do this, I just said Vista's greedy limit is the reason that
> UTorrent does not work with Vista), I suspect that the hack would have
> been eventually necessary.
>
> "And you trying to run software that is not vista compatible from the
> manufacture"
> Hmm. So I should just buy thousands of dollars to replace good
> software for the privilege of having Vista?
> The OS is supposed to be for the benefit of running applications not
> the other way around?
> In the case of Nero 6.3, at the time that I installed it, it was on
> Microsoft's list for Vista compatible software and has since been
> removed.
>
>
>
>
> Dennis, I had two RAM chips, I ultimately swapped them around and when
> I was running only with the bad chip, I had an instantly and
> consistently blue screen.
> I kept swapping to prove that the port wasn't the problem.
> The computer ran fine with only the good chip.
> My PC manufacturer. (Magic Micro) was very supportive and sent me 2
> new chips with few questions asked. (I sent back the one bad and the
> one good chip).
>
> Vista didn't know it was still authentic after that and Microsoft
> couldn't fix it.
>
> I could have formatted and put Vista back on and it would have worked.
> I opted not to put Vista on, mostly for the incompatibility and
> possibly instability issues.
> I say instability because the updates and authentication where the
> only things that seemed to suffer from the bad ram after the problem
> was fixed.
>
> -----------
>
> Frank,
>
> I don't know why some people are so involved with the OS that if
> anyone doesn't give rave reviews they take it personally and feel they
> have to flame.
> I guess they see it as an attack of their religion.
> To me it is more of a movie review. You like the movie, I didn't.
>
> ------------
>
> Sumer Yamaner,
>
> Thanks,
> I didn't realize that indexing can be turned off.
> PCworld said that it was "nearly impossible" and I never actually
> tried.
> hxxp://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/11/Burden-of-proof-on-Google-in-Vista-antitrust-claim_1.html
>
>
> --------
> Thanks,
> Crzzy1
>
>
>
 
J

jinkyjoany

"cozzmo1@hotmail.com" wrote:

>
> > As you had a memory problem almost anything could happen.
> > Have you tried since you fixed the machine?
> >

> I did.
>
>
>
> I will answer several posts here.
>
> -------
>
> Vista user, (his name says it all)
> I want to relay my experience and I hope it may help others with some
> of the same issues.
>
> I shouldn't run AOL or Mcafee?? ,
> that I didn't check vista drivers??, (I did)
> You must not have read my post.
> You said I was "trying to hack the number of connections". (I didn't
> actually do this, I just said Vista's greedy limit is the reason that
> UTorrent does not work with Vista), I suspect that the hack would have
> been eventually necessary.
>
> "And you trying to run software that is not vista compatible from the
> manufacture"
> Hmm. So I should just buy thousands of dollars to replace good
> software for the privilege of having Vista?
> The OS is supposed to be for the benefit of running applications not
> the other way around?
> In the case of Nero 6.3, at the time that I installed it, it was on
> Microsoft's list for Vista compatible software and has since been
> removed.
>
>
>
>
> Dennis, I had two RAM chips, I ultimately swapped them around and when
> I was running only with the bad chip, I had an instantly and
> consistently blue screen.
> I kept swapping to prove that the port wasn't the problem.
> The computer ran fine with only the good chip.
> My PC manufacturer. (Magic Micro) was very supportive and sent me 2
> new chips with few questions asked. (I sent back the one bad and the
> one good chip).
>
> Vista didn't know it was still authentic after that and Microsoft
> couldn't fix it.
>
> I could have formatted and put Vista back on and it would have worked.
> I opted not to put Vista on, mostly for the incompatibility and
> possibly instability issues.
> I say instability because the updates and authentication where the
> only things that seemed to suffer from the bad ram after the problem
> was fixed.
>
> -----------
>
> Frank,
>
> I don't know why some people are so involved with the OS that if
> anyone doesn't give rave reviews they take it personally and feel they
> have to flame.
> I guess they see it as an attack of their religion.
> To me it is more of a movie review. You like the movie, I didn't.
>
> ------------
>
> Sumer Yamaner,
>
> Thanks,
> I didn't realize that indexing can be turned off.
> PCworld said that it was "nearly impossible" and I never actually
> tried.
> hxxp://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/11/Burden-of-proof-on-Google-in-Vista-antitrust-claim_1.html
>
>
> --------
> Thanks,
> Crzzy1
> im getting error code 8000B0I00 an so not savvy on all this and, have not been able to update for 4 months, the tech tells me i need to reformat. its there problem and they expect me to pay to have it reformatted. vista is a nightmare !!!!!!
>
>
 
C

cozzmo1@hotmail.com

On Dec 29 2007, 2:25 pm, jinkyjoany
<jinkyjo...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> "cozz...@hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > As you had a memory problem almost anything could happen.
> > > Have you tried since you fixed the machine?

>
> > I did.

>
> > I will answer several posts here.

>
> > -------

>
> > Vista user, (his name says it all)
> > I want to relay my experience and I hope it may help others with some
> > of the same issues.

>
> > I shouldn't run AOL or Mcafee?? ,
> > that I didn't check vista drivers??, (I did)
> > You must not have read my post.
> > You said I was "trying to hack the number of connections". (I didn't
> > actually do this, I just said Vista's greedy limit is the reason that
> > UTorrent does not work with Vista), I suspect that the hack would have
> > been eventually necessary.

>
> > "And you trying to run software that is not vista compatible from the
> > manufacture"
> > Hmm. So I should just buy thousands of dollars to replace good
> > software for the privilege of having Vista?
> > The OS is supposed to be for the benefit of running applications not
> > the other way around?
> > In the case of Nero 6.3, at the time that I installed it, it was on
> > Microsoft's list for Vista compatible software and has since been
> > removed.

>
> > Dennis, I had two RAM chips, I ultimately swapped them around and when
> > I was running only with the bad chip, I had an instantly and
> > consistently blue screen.
> > I kept swapping to prove that the port wasn't the problem.
> > The computer ran fine with only the good chip.
> > My PC manufacturer. (Magic Micro) was very supportive and sent me 2
> > new chips with few questions asked. (I sent back the one bad and the
> > one good chip).

>
> > Vista didn't know it was still authentic after that and Microsoft
> > couldn't fix it.

>
> > I could have formatted and put Vista back on and it would have worked.
> > I opted not to put Vista on, mostly for the incompatibility and
> > possibly instability issues.
> > I say instability because the updates and authentication where the
> > only things that seemed to suffer from the bad ram after the problem
> > was fixed.

>
> > -----------

>
> > Frank,

>
> > I don't know why some people are so involved with the OS that if
> > anyone doesn't give rave reviews they take it personally and feel they
> > have to flame.
> > I guess they see it as an attack of their religion.
> > To me it is more of a movie review. You like the movie, I didn't.

>
> > ------------

>
> > Sumer Yamaner,

>
> > Thanks,
> > I didn't realize that indexing can be turned off.
> > PCworld said that it was "nearly impossible" and I never actually
> > tried.
> > hxxp://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/11/Burden-of-proof-on-Google-in-Vista...

>
> > --------
> > Thanks,
> >Crzzy1



> im getting error code 8000B0I00 an so not savvy on all this and, have not been able to update for 4 months, the tech tells me i need to reformat. its there problem and they expect me to pay to have it reformatted. vista is a nightmare !!!!!!




------
> im getting error code 8000B0I00 an so not savvy on all this and, have not been able to update for 4 months, the tech tells me i need to reformat. its there problem and they expect me to pay to have it reformatted. vista is a nightmare !!!!!!


--------

I think that in this case, especially if your PC isn't booting, you
probably do need to reformat.

Don't waste too much time on the phone with Microsoft tech support as
they employ the tiered tag team method of exhausting your patience
over days and weeks of talk and toil.
Then they will tell you to reformat anyway.

I would look at this as an opportunity to bite the bullet and upgrade
to XP..
You will never regret it.
First I would buy a second HD for backup. (everyone needs one anyway).
and then using your Vista disk, do a repair bootup to DOS, then backup
all your files to the second drive.

Then, format and install XP on the first drive.

crzzy1
 
Back
Top Bottom