- Thread starter
- #21
P
PA Bear [MS MVP]
Alan Edwards wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> UTC -1600 would put you in Western Australia (e.g., Perth), but then the
>>> date would be Fri., 19 Sept 2008.
>>
>> And if you were, in fact, in WA and your date was correct, the UTC offset
>> (right now) would be +0800
>
> That's better.
On second thought, I figured some clarification might be in order there.
<eg>
> AFAIK, there is no such thing as UTC -1600, despite it showing in his
> headers.
I was thinking the same thing, Alan. How those headers are showing
UTC -1600 remains a mystery to me.
--
~R
>> <snip>
>>> UTC -1600 would put you in Western Australia (e.g., Perth), but then the
>>> date would be Fri., 19 Sept 2008.
>>
>> And if you were, in fact, in WA and your date was correct, the UTC offset
>> (right now) would be +0800
>
> That's better.
On second thought, I figured some clarification might be in order there.
<eg>
> AFAIK, there is no such thing as UTC -1600, despite it showing in his
> headers.
I was thinking the same thing, Alan. How those headers are showing
UTC -1600 remains a mystery to me.
--
~R