Only 16 More Days to Go!

[Muad'Dib]

LD55ZRA wrote:

> Muad'Dib wrote:

>

>

>>

>> From MS Technet:

>>

>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>

>>

>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will

>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a

>> free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be

>> seen if a) the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft

>> will properly maintain it with regards to keeping their virus

>> signature files up to date. If they do it right, you should expect

>> signature file updates at least once per day."

>>

>>

>> Next?

>

>

> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:

>

>

>

> hth

>



I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote

right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.



G'day

 

[Frank]

On 4/18/2010 9:49 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

> LD55ZRA wrote:

>> Muad'Dib wrote:

>>

>>

>>>

>>> From MS Technet:

>>>

>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>

>>>

>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows

>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on

>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it

>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)

>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping

>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you

>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."

>>>

>>>

>>> Next?

>>

>>

>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:

>>

>>

>>

>> hth

>>

>

> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote

> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.

>

> G'day



Hey fuck-face...you didn't provide proof of anything. Quoting one person

making a statement over 1 yr ago proves nothing...other than he can run

his mouth...like you do.

 

[Alias]

Muad'Dib wrote:

> LD55ZRA wrote:

>> Muad'Dib wrote:

>>

>>

>>>

>>> From MS Technet:

>>>

>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>

>>>

>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows

>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on

>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it

>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)

>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping

>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you

>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."

>>>

>>>

>>> Next?

>>

>>

>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:

>>

>>

>>

>> hth

>>

>

> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote

> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.

>

> G'day



http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable-8-10-viruses/



http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1134



http://windows.about.com/b/2009/11/07/windows-7-vulnerable-to-viruses.htm



http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2009/11/03/80-percent-of-viruses-love-windows-7/



Need more? There's lots of them.



--

Alias

 

[Frank]

alias is afraid to answer my question...LOL!

On 4/19/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

> Muad'Dib wrote:

>> LD55ZRA wrote:

>>> Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> From MS Technet:

>>>>

>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows

>>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on

>>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it

>>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)

>>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping

>>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you

>>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Next?

>>>

>>>

>>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> hth

>>>

>>

>> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote

>> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.

>>

>> G'day

>

> http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable-8-10-viruses/

>

>

> http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1134

>

> http://windows.about.com/b/2009/11/07/windows-7-vulnerable-to-viruses.htm

>

> http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2009/11/03/80-percent-of-viruses-love-windows-7/

>

>

> Need more? There's lots of them.

>

Hey sheep-fucker, maybe you should read those articles you posted before

posting them because a properly updated and anti-virus protected

computer running Vista/7 is very secure.

But my question, that you and mr kangaroo keep avoiding is, how many

computers running Vista/7 have you personally "cleaned"?

Well...are you man enough to answer that legitimate question?

 

[Muad'Dib]

ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:

> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>

>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>> Winders

>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are not

>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get

>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing everything

>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and

>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>> MacFee,

>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to

>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled rendering

>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't

>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY

>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY

>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.

>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients are

>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>

>>>> G'day

>>>

>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>

>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>

>> From MS Technet:

>>

>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>

>>

>>

>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will

>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a free

>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen if a)

>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly

>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to

>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at

>> least once per day."

>>

>>

>> Next?

>

> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7 and

> the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

> Well....



I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not

true...-->as has been proven.

 

[Frank]

ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>>

>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>>> Winders

>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are

>>>>> not

>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get

>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing

>>>>> everything

>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and

>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>>> MacFee,

>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to

>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled

>>>>> rendering

>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't

>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY

>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY

>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.

>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients are

>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>>

>>>>> G'day

>>>>

>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>>

>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>>

>>> From MS Technet:

>>>

>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will

>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a free

>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen if a)

>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly

>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to

>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at

>>> least once per day."

>>>

>>>

>>> Next?

>>

>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7

>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

>> Well....

>

> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not

> true...-->as has been proven.

 

[Muad'Dib]

ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:

> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>>>> Winders

>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are

>>>>>> not

>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get

>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing

>>>>>> everything

>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and

>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>>>> MacFee,

>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to

>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled

>>>>>> rendering

>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't

>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY

>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY

>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.

>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients

>>>>>> are

>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> G'day

>>>>>

>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>>>

>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>>>

>>>> From MS Technet:

>>>>

>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will

>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a

>>>> free

>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen

>>>> if a)

>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly

>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to

>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at

>>>> least once per day."

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Next?

>>>

>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7

>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

>>> Well....

>>

>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not

>> true...-->as has been proven.

 

[Frank]

ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>>>>> Winders

>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are

>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't

>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing

>>>>>>> everything

>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,

>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>>>>> MacFee,

>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were

>>>>>>> UNABLE to

>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled

>>>>>>> rendering

>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't

>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with

>>>>>>> MANY

>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to

>>>>>>> TRY

>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore

>>>>>>> anymore.

>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my

>>>>>>> clients are

>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> G'day

>>>>>>

>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>>>>

>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>>>>

>>>>> From MS Technet:

>>>>>

>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will

>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a

>>>>> free

>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen

>>>>> if a)

>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly

>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to

>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at

>>>>> least once per day."

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Next?

>>>>

>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7

>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

>>>> Well....

>>>

>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not

>>> true...-->as has been proven.

 

[Muad'Dib]

ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:

> On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>>>>>> Winders

>>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are

>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't

>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing

>>>>>>>> everything

>>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,

>>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>>>>>> MacFee,

>>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were

>>>>>>>> UNABLE to

>>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled

>>>>>>>> rendering

>>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't

>>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with

>>>>>>>> MANY

>>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to

>>>>>>>> TRY

>>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore

>>>>>>>> anymore.

>>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my

>>>>>>>> clients are

>>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> G'day

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>>>>>

>>>>>> From MS Technet:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows

>>>>>> will

>>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a

>>>>>> free

>>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen

>>>>>> if a)

>>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will

>>>>>> properly

>>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to

>>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file

>>>>>> updates at

>>>>>> least once per day."

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Next?

>>>>>

>>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7

>>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

>>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

>>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

>>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

>>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

>>>>> Well....

>>>>

>>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

>>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

>>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

>>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

>>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not

>>>> true...-->as has been proven.

 

[Frank]

mr kangaroo man is a lying linux advocate...

On 5/3/2010 1:17 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>> On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:

>>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> "Drew" wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of

>>>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,

>>>>>>>>> Winders

>>>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We

>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't

>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing

>>>>>>>>> everything

>>>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,

>>>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,

>>>>>>>>> MacFee,

>>>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others

>>>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were

>>>>>>>>> UNABLE to

>>>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled

>>>>>>>>> rendering

>>>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there

>>>>>>>>> isn't

>>>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with

>>>>>>>>> MANY

>>>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to

>>>>>>>>> TRY

>>>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore

>>>>>>>>> anymore.

>>>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my

>>>>>>>>> clients are

>>>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> G'day

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> From MS Technet:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows

>>>>>>> will

>>>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a

>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen

>>>>>>> if a)

>>>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will

>>>>>>> properly

>>>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files

>>>>>>> up to

>>>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file

>>>>>>> updates at

>>>>>>> least once per day."

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Next?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7

>>>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.

>>>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.

>>>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING

>>>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!

>>>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?

>>>>>> Well....

>>>>>

>>>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my

>>>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is

>>>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I

>>>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you

>>>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply

>>>>> not

>>>>> true...-->as has been proven.