- Thread starter
- #81
G
Gary S. Terhune
All I know is that if I came here with a problem, I'd expect someone(s) to
assist in diagnosing the problems and then developing a solution, not
throwing the entire manual at me. As I said, his posts can be useful, and
that is in part due to myself and others ragging on him as he perfected his
collection.
But seriously, when you drop by the shop with your Mustang's engine making a
terrible row and not able to go a step further, would you want the guy to
toss you the Chilton's manual for all cars made by Ford and then leave you
on your own? Because that's what PCR used to do, without fail, way back
when. Besides, much of what he wrote in those master posts was pure
plagiarism. How would you like to see someone else, day in and day out,
writing advice in your name and getting it WRONG all the time? Not including
context and conditionalities, the nuances of the originals, etc.?
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com
"pebble" <pebble@vista.rock.com> wrote in message
news:%23RCV8QLrIHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> > PCR was just as bad with his ludicrous master posts, but after several
>> months of my abusing him, while he refused to go away, his posting style
>> did get better somewhat. I figure if several months of abuse worked for
>> PCR, maybe it will work on this Philo character. Not to confuse PCR and
>> Philo, since what PCR does (sometimes, still) is generally harmless if
>> irritating, and actually has some redeeming value for those who want to
>> read through reams of possible fixes,
>
> No, no, no Gary. I find PCR to be of enormous help to all. Why do you
> find his master posts ludicrous? I find them very helpful, PCR has often
> pulled my trusty '98 from the brink. He always follows through his
> answers offering many alternatives to try, he never stops trying although
> you seem to find him trying hahahahahahaha
>
> But seriously, I reckon he should be an MS MVP He'd gets my goat er vote
> everytime.
>
> pebbleinboulder
assist in diagnosing the problems and then developing a solution, not
throwing the entire manual at me. As I said, his posts can be useful, and
that is in part due to myself and others ragging on him as he perfected his
collection.
But seriously, when you drop by the shop with your Mustang's engine making a
terrible row and not able to go a step further, would you want the guy to
toss you the Chilton's manual for all cars made by Ford and then leave you
on your own? Because that's what PCR used to do, without fail, way back
when. Besides, much of what he wrote in those master posts was pure
plagiarism. How would you like to see someone else, day in and day out,
writing advice in your name and getting it WRONG all the time? Not including
context and conditionalities, the nuances of the originals, etc.?
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com
"pebble" <pebble@vista.rock.com> wrote in message
news:%23RCV8QLrIHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> > PCR was just as bad with his ludicrous master posts, but after several
>> months of my abusing him, while he refused to go away, his posting style
>> did get better somewhat. I figure if several months of abuse worked for
>> PCR, maybe it will work on this Philo character. Not to confuse PCR and
>> Philo, since what PCR does (sometimes, still) is generally harmless if
>> irritating, and actually has some redeeming value for those who want to
>> read through reams of possible fixes,
>
> No, no, no Gary. I find PCR to be of enormous help to all. Why do you
> find his master posts ludicrous? I find them very helpful, PCR has often
> pulled my trusty '98 from the brink. He always follows through his
> answers offering many alternatives to try, he never stops trying although
> you seem to find him trying hahahahahahaha
>
> But seriously, I reckon he should be an MS MVP He'd gets my goat er vote
> everytime.
>
> pebbleinboulder